034 I David Hayward aka The Naked Pastor on Faith, Doubt, and the Power of Love

Promotional image for the Beautiful Kingdom Builders podcast featuring David Hayward, also known as 'The Naked Pastor'. The image includes a portrait of Hayward, along with cartoon illustrations, a logo for Beautiful Kingdom Builders, and text announcing the podcast episode.

In this episode, I spoke with David Hayward, a.k.a. “the Naked Pastor”, exploring his journey from traditional ministry to a provocative cartoonist challenging church culture, theology, and love. We talked about faith deconstruction, the nature of love, and the impact of evangelical culture. I especially appreciated how Hayward explained the importance of LGBTQ inclusivity as the authentic expression of God’s love, and the expansion of our lives through faith shifts and growth, not in a way that should make us look down on previous versions of ourselves, but in a way that absorbs and includes those versions.

Visit nakedpastor.com to read Hayward’s blog, and to purchase some prints for your home office and gifts!
And follow Naked Pastor on Facebook, X, Instagram, TikTok, Pinterest, and YouTube.

You can find this episode of The Beautiful Kingdom Builders podcast on YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music, Substack, and more!

TRANSCRIPT:

Rev. Ruth Perry (00:15)
My guest today is David Hayward, the Naked Pastor.

David Hayward (00:19)
Yeah.

Rev. Ruth Perry (00:20)
I’m really excited to have a conversation with you today. David, I’ve been following your work for a very long time. And on my podcast, I like to have conversations about gender, justice, abuse, and healing in the Christian faith.

And the Beautiful Kingdom Builders started as a place to talk about women in ministry and inclusion of women in the church because I grew up fundamentalist and had to rethink all that when God called me to ministry. But then as dominos started falling and I started talking about more and more things on my page. And so now I feel like everything that I care about, I see cartoons made by the Naked Pastor.

David Hayward (00:53)
Yeah.

Rev. Ruth Perry (00:54)
And I’m just really excited to hear your story and dive in today.

David Hayward (00:57)
Thank you.

Rev. Ruth Perry (00:58)
Thank you for being here.

David Hayward (00:59)
Yeah, my pleasure. Thanks for inviting me on your podcast.

Rev. Ruth Perry (01:02)
Well, it would be a miracle if anybody hasn’t seen your cartoons before, but if they haven’t, can we go back and hear your story?

David Hayward (01:09)
Yeah. Yeah. So maybe right off the bat I’ll explain the name Naked Pastor. It was back in two thousand and five or something. I was running a blog and it was like I can’t even remember the name. Maybe it was David Hayward.ca. C A stands for Canada. I’m from Canada, But I wanted a dot com name and everything. Then

I got the name churchpundit.com and then that sounded a little bit pretentious. So I was a pastor at the time of a church, and there were a lot pastors in the blogosphere at that time blogging and so I thought I want mine to be really different. I want it to stand out, I want people to really see what goes on in the life of a pastor, what goes on behind the scenes in a church, not just all the good things, but the struggles as well, the conflicts, the financial struggles, you know, all this kind of stuff.

And and so I thought Naked Pastor, meaning I’m gonna reveal everything about what goes on. I’m gonna pull back the curtain and just show everybody what what goes on in the church and in my life, you know, not only my strengths, but my weaknesses, my doubts, my questions, my struggles. And so that’s where the term Naked Pastor came from. As you can see, I’m fully clothed.

Rev. Ruth Perry (02:20)
Thank you for that.

David Hayward (02:22)
Yeah, yeah. And I’m I’m a very modest guy, but I’m also very honest. So that’s where the name Naked Pastor came from. And I started that back in 2005. I can’t believe I’ve been going 21 years now.

And I don’t know, about a few months in, I decided, because I’d I’d been painting and things like that on the side while being a pastor for so many years. I thought, I’m gonna try cartooning, see what happens. And I gave I challenged myself to try it to draw a cartoon every day until I ran out of ideas. And I thought I would last a couple weeks, maybe or whatever. But here I am, you know, 21 years later, still drawing cartoons every day.

I’ve got thousands of cartoons and and and they just took off. So that’s what Naked Pastor sort of became known as is a cartoonist talking about those things you mentioned, spiritual abuse, women in ministry, women in general, feminism, LGBTQ plus community, racism, theology, the Bible, etc., church stuff.

And it’s resonated with a lot of people around the world. So I had no idea my cartoons would be seen by so many people. But I love what I do and many people appreciate it. People ask me if I’m retired and I’m like, I’ll never retire. I’ll do this as long as I can.

Freedom funeral. That’s what I call my retirement package. So I left the ministry, the the official ministry in 2010. And I’d been serving the church for about 30 years at that point as a pastor. And now I really feel like I’m doing the same kind of work, but online with people.

Helping people move on in their spiritual journeys and so on. And just encouraging and uplifting and edifying and encouraging and validating people on their journeys. That seems to be what I’m doing, which is what I did as a pastor of real churches. So I kept the name, Naked Pastor, and here we are today.

Rev. Ruth Perry (04:08)
Yeah, you definitely have a pastor’s heart and you just show so much love and light on the internet. I think a lot of times the people who have ministry on the internet get a lot of crap from people who look down. But in order to create the cartoons you create, you’re condensing a lot of theological education and pastoral ministry and deep awareness being raised and conditioned and you know formed in this culture. So you’re speaking very profoundly in these images. Can you share about like the way you were raised and what your theological education is and your experience?

David Hayward (04:46)
Yeah. Yeah. So I was raised in a Christian home. My mom and dad, before I was born, got saved at a Billy Graham Crusade in Toronto. And I don’t remember really us going to church together as a family a whole lot. My dad was a cop and we moved around quite a bit. He was transferred quite a bit in in Ontario, Canada. And so we went to whatever church was convenient.

But then when I was around 16, I joined a Baptist youth group and ended up getting born again, again. I was already baptized as an infant in the Anglican church, which is equivalent to your Episcopal pretty much. So we soon all as a family were going to this church and then we switched to Pentecostal. And then, I was in the Pentecostal church for years, went to a Pentecostal Bible college in Springfield, Missouri. That’s where I met my wife Lisa.

Then I went to a seminary, Gordon Conwell, in Boston, got my master’s in New Testament studies, years of Greek, years of Hebrew, even Aramaic, started studying for my PhD at Toronto University in New Testament studies. we ended up getting pregnant. We could no longer continue just because of finances and life and everything. And I ended up being invited to be ordained in the Presbyterian Church in Canada, ended up becoming a Presbyterian minister and serving the Presbyterian Church for many years.

And then after a while, I got bored with that and we switched to Vineyard, which is a mixture of Pentecostal and evangelical theology. And that’s where I ended up serving the rest of my time as a pastor, basically. That’s a long story short, but so you can see I’ve been around the block. I call myself my own ecumenical movement because I’ve been in so many denominations.

My first spiritual director too, she was a Roman Catholic nun. I’ve been heavily influenced by people like Thomas Merton and Henri Nowen and so on. So not only do I have Anglican, Presbyterian, Reformed, Calvinistic stuff, but Roman Catholic mysticism, Baptist, Pentecostal, independent. So I’ve had all those experiences and and all that education as well. I got my MDiv as well on top of that.

And so it’s like you say, all this stuff and all this experience distills itself down into these cartoons. I have a lot to say. because I’ve seen a lot what goes on in the church and what goes on in theology and what goes on inside the life of these people who associate themselves with Christianity and the church, and maybe even people who are what we call deconstructing, questioning their beliefs and, questioning their relationship with the church or religion in general, God, the whole, buffet.

And so all this stuff interests me because bottom line is, I really want to help people on their spiritual journeys get from their point A to their point B, whatever I can do to help. And a lot of people have to deal with not only theological questions, they have to deal with complications with the church and feeling controlled or coerced or manipulated in the church, maybe even abused. They’re having to deal with sexism in the church, maybe even misogyny. They’re having to deal with maybe racism in Christianity, you know, anti-LGBTQ issues and stuff. So I’ve got a lot to talk about. There is a lot to talk about.

And I found that I could write a 1,000-word blog post, or I could draw a cartoon. And I found my cartoons way more effective at getting my ideas across. And so that’s what I seem to be spending most of my time doing now is drawing cartoons trying to say what I want to say.

Rev. Ruth Perry (08:15)
Yeah, I think that you really found a powerful medium because that’s what I’ve noticed. I’ve been doing the Beautiful Kingdom Builders Facebook page for maybe eleven years now. So not as long. But people definitely engage with images far more than reading a long post or clicking on a link to read an article. And that’s part of the reason why I started this podcast is because I wanted to have more nuanced conversations with people.

But I do think that what you’re doing with the cartoons is really impactful and really powerful. And it’s really

David Hayward (08:45)
Thank you.

Rev. Ruth Perry (08:46)
bothered me how much culture warring, Christianity, and this kind of need to control and dominate has infected the church in a way that has perpetuated a lot of harm. And the people who put themselves in positions of power and authority over others are impervious to hearing about the harm. They just can’t hear it. But then the people that are experiencing it are just leaving the church or leaving the faith, or they’re going on a really painful deconstruction journey, questioning their faith.

David Hayward (09:16)
Yeah.

Rev. Ruth Perry (09:16)
I guess what my first question would be, I remember when I was in college, my friend from high school had become a Christian and then we were at different schools and she messaged me one day that she was doubting her faith. And I remember just falling on my bed and weeping as though she had died. I couldn’t understand doubt at all.

And then later on, I’ve had my own doubts and I’ve had my own questions and started to go through that process. But it was really painful for me to hear that someone was doubting. I didn’t have any tools as a I I mean, I’d been a Christian for 20 years in the church and but I didn’t have tools to understand where she was coming from. So what might be like some of the missing tools in the tool belt of a Christian to hear someone who has a different perspective from them?

David Hayward (09:57)
Yeah. Well, I wonder what’s happened to your friend now.

Rev. Ruth Perry (10:00)
She well, actually she tragically died of a pulmonary embolism at 21 years old.

David Hayward (10:06)
Oh dear.

Rev. Ruth Perry (10:06)
And for me, that was the first faith crisis I had, where I blamed myself that I did not speak directly to her doubt. And I was carrying her salvation and her eternal conscious torment on my shoulders because I was a Calvinist and I believed, you know,

David Hayward (10:19)
Wow. Yeah.

Rev. Ruth Perry (10:21)
if she didn’t express faith in Jesus Christ in this lifetime, then she was burning in hell for all eternity. And so I was angry at myself and I was angry at God. And that was my senior year of college.

David Hayward (10:32)
Yeah, yeah, profound. Wow. That’s what I have found is most of us in fact everybody I know of and and including myself is these questions don’t just happen out of nowhere. It’s often a crisis precipitates our questioning or our doubt or our deconstruction, it’s like I’ve known l several people who are vehemently anti LGBTQ, but as soon as their son comes out, then that’s a crisis. I have seen some people harden themselves and reject their own child. But many I’ve seen their heart softens because the question.

It’s when we experience a personal crisis that these important life moments like deconstruction or doubt or whatever they they can happen under that kind of a condition. They I don’t think they just sort of just happen out of nowhere. Often it’s some kind of a crisis, a serious question or an experience or a loss or or something.

Rev. Ruth Perry (11:32)
What was your first crisis of faith?

David Hayward (11:34)
My first crisis of faith, I remember it very, very distinctly. And this was what launched my deconstruction, the beginning, the very beginning of my deconstruction. So I was at seminary. I was studying Master’s New Testament studies. I was all done. I had already gotten my grades. I was graduating cum lade and I was getting ready for the graduation ceremony. I had my robe on and my cap, everything, and getting ready to go.

And I was freaking out inside because I had just realized I wasn’t sure about the inspiration of scripture. So now it wasn’t because of seminary, because that was an evangelical seminary. Though there was no question about the sovereignty of God or inspiration of scripture. I call them the three eyes. It’s inspired, infallible, and inerrant.

I had believed that my whole Christian life. I was a Bible, Bibleic or whatever you call it. Yeah, I was I was in deep. I was totally committed. I was all in. But I suddenly realized the truth is I read a book that really, really challenged my belief about the inspiration, infallibility, and inerrancy of scripture.

Now, I’m going to tell you the book because people are going to ask you, and I get asked all the time, what’s the book? And and really, it’s not about the book. Although it’s a good book, I still have it. it’s I read it every once in a while, and it’s called The Silence of Jesus by James Breach. He was a New Testament scholar at York University in Toronto. It was just a little book, and just the way he wrote it and what he said it made me realize I don’t know if I believe in the inspiration of scripture. And that to me was traumatic.

I compare it to a Jenga block tower, and the block from the bottom that was holding it all together was pulled out and the whole thing started crumbling. Or it’s like the rug being pulled out from under me. It was like everything I believed in depended on the Bible being inspired.

And so I remember the moment. And I was with my wife Lisa, I was like freaking out. And she like grabbed me by the shoulders. She says, You have to go to your graduation ceremony. You know, I had to get there early, and she was gonna be coming along and sitting in the audience, but I was freaking out. So that was the beginning of my deconstruction. and I

I compare my deconstruction to a glacial melt or corrupt code being inserted into my theological brain and just corrupting my code. It took decades, decades to finally resolve it all. So my deconstruction was a long, long process and some people it’s overnight, not me. It took a long, long time. And I was in ministry that whole time. So, you know, it was a challenge for sure. But that was the beginning of it. That was when it was hatched.

Rev. Ruth Perry (14:13)
I actually went to Gordon Conwell also.

David Hayward (14:16)
Did you really?

Rev. Ruth Perry (14:17)
And my husband, yeah, and I went to Gordon College. So I was in that area for seven years.

David Hayward (14:21)
Wow.

Rev. Ruth Perry (14:22)
The theology department, had they had had some kind of conflict between different theological points of views at some point. Were you there before that or after that?

David Hayward (14:31)
I was at while that was happening.

Rev. Ruth Perry (14:34)
Fun.

David Hayward (14:34)
So my I studied under Dr. Gordon Fee, who’s the world-renowned text critic, New Testament scholar. And then David Scholler was there and who was the New Testament scholar. He wrote a book about Jesus. I can’t remember the name of the book, and I can’t remember his name either, but I loved him and he was great. I’d remember it if I gave myself a moment. But the point of his book was that Jesus’ understanding, his self-awareness sort of grew and dawned on him. It wasn’t like he knew who he was the
whole time. And that was heretical, according to other scholars there.

And that’s when he was dismissed. And Dr. Gordon Fee left. And that’s when Gordon-Conwell, right after I left, took a very strong right turn and became more conservative, you know. So it was tragic, too bad, because it was a great school.

I graduated from there in eighty three, I think. And so it was way back then. That was a long time ago.

Rev. Ruth Perry (15:33)
I graduated in 2005. So

David Hayward (15:35)
Okay.

Rev. Ruth Perry (15:36)
a little bit of time difference there. But

David Hayward (15:38)
Yeah. Yeah.

Rev. Ruth Perry (15:39)
For me, some of conservative complementarian beliefs were really challenged in seminary. I took a class on Ephesians, and the professor was egalitarian. And then I’d had a lot of women mentors and professors in college and seminary, but I was really latched on to complementarianism. And so even though I’d had reasons to doubt and question it, I did not question anything until I was thirty years old and pregnant

David Hayward (16:05)
Right.

Rev. Ruth Perry (16:05)
with my third child. And our church had split. We were being socially shunned by our church because my dad had been the pastor and so we were experiencing another crisis, emotional faith crisis. And I had thought that my, faith background and my family were both perfect and they were imploding. And so I encountered Brennan Manning videos on YouTube and I heard his message of God is grace and mercy and his love for you is unconditional. And it really hit home because my heart was hurting and I realized I had been living with a conditional idea of God’s love all this time. And I’m 30 years old now. Always been taught that God loved me, but always striving to belong and fit in.

And so it was after that experience of deciding that God’s love for me was unconditional. That was what gave me the freedom to then go back and consider the things that I had been confronted about egalitarianism versus complementarianism. And start to rethink my faith in a lot of different areas. But it does seem looking back now, reading the Bible through a different lens.

David Hayward (17:12)
Yes.

Rev. Ruth Perry (17:12)
It seems like there the another thing I’ve learned a lot about is dynamics of abuse and domestic violence and you know the abuse wheel is all about power and control.

David Hayward (17:24)
Yes.

Rev. Ruth Perry (17:25)
And now looking back, I can see that so much of the culture that I grew up in in conservative evangelical Christianity was about power and control and gatekeeping, who I read and listened to. And I lived with such fear of people outside of my circle of belonging. Can we talk about what evangelical culture is like and wh why it doesn’t really show the fullness and the abundance of life that Christ wants for us?

David Hayward (17:52)
I often compare it to parents raising their children and they are really fearful about their kids straying away f like they they want their kids close to them, they want them safe, and they want them forever. And the the only way you can do that is if you have very strong boundaries and very strong ethos and and very strong values and beliefs. And and so the way many parents parent then is high control and making sure that their kids, you know, think and live the right way. Because this is the only way we’re going to be able to stay together and be a little family or a tribe or whatever.

And then when the children get to the age when they start doubting or questioning or even rebelling or resisting or challenging, then it it it threatens the the the network and threatens it with possible division and breakup and so on. And so the parents just double down and you know get stricter and more controlling and so on. And they really do believe it’s for the unity of the family to keep it together and keep the kids safe and, you know, whatever.

And I think many churches are the same way and and the church in general. It’s it’s a way to keep it’s crowd control. It it’s just it’s crowd control and and it’s keeping keeping the flock a flock you know keeping it together and and and so on but when it comes down to it though I think that’s evangelical church culture you know very very strong beliefs and very very regulated behavior and that’s how it’s gonna work. And if everybody signs up for this, then it’s easy. It’s great.

But if anybody challenges it, then it messes the up the whole, charade. And you know, it’s that’s why a lot of I think a lot of evangelical or conservative churches and so on have very cult like qualities. And maybe even some our cults, you know, just that very strong top-down control, manipulation, coercion, and it it resembles very much a cult. So and and that’s why I think people who question are I think they’re very brave and very courageous to allow those questions to rise.

For example, your friend way back when she said, I’m beginning to question my faith. At such a young age, that’s quite a courageous thing to do. And to share that with somebody is even braver. And we’re seeing that more and more nowadays, where people are willing to let the doubts emerge and even for them to express them. That’s a very courageous thing to do. Because it used to be that you would be done, in the church. That you’d be finished. And but people are willing to take that risk now.

Rev. Ruth Perry (20:39)
Yeah, I’m thinking about a situation in my local town right now, which our town has a history of churches splitting over the issue of LGBTQ inclusion.

David Hayward (20:51)
Mm-hmm.

Rev. Ruth Perry (20:51)
And I would say the vast majority of our town believes an unaffirming perspective where they would call it the gay lifestyle is a choice that someone makes and it’s sin and that God condemns it and so they’re you know they’re condemned but then I think there is a way to hold your convictions and still love your neighbor but what I see is that this point of view, the fruit of that tends to be a lot of harm and homophobia. And families will just cut children off or feel so much shame if their child comes out. and the people who are questioning their sexuality they’re feeling a lot of shame. Those are the kids that are getting bullied in the schools.

David Hayward (21:36)
Mm-hmm.

Rev. Ruth Perry (21:36)
There’s more violence against them, there’s higher suicide rates. And so we could see that there’s so much harm being done through homophobia in our culture. And how can we speak to people who have biblical convictions about holding those in a way that don’t cause harm.

David Hayward (21:55)
Well, I’m I’m not sure it’s possible, but there’s there’s a couple things I have to say about that. There’s two approaches to the Bible and at the LGBTQ community. So one is the biblical scholar approach. and so when people say they they pull out the clobber verses, we call them the clobber verses, the verses that condemn, apparently condemn the gay lifestyle or homosexuality or whatever. Or you know, I don’t permit a woman to wear, a man to wear woman’s clothing or what you know, whatever. Those verses. They pull them out.

But there’s a lot of scholarship now that questions the traditional interpretation of those passages. And there’s some really good scholars, some of them friends of mine I highly respect, who really are casting doubt on the conservative, anti-LGBTQ homophobic interpretations of those passages and the way they’ve been translated, even. And you know, so for example.

Verses that talk about homosexuality in Romans or whatever, I do not permit a man to sleep with a man or whatever those verses often is referring to temple sexual use of boys, for example, you know, in temple ceremonies and things like that. So, you know, there’s that whole biblical approach.

Where it they’re they’re casting new and fresh interpretations and light on those passages. So there’s that route. And and so when when somebody says, What about the Bible though? What the Bible says isn’t that? I said, Well, you know, go read this person, Dan McClellan, for example, or you know, Brandon Robertson, or these people who are scholars in their own right. New Testament scholars, Old Testament scholars, and are casting new light on these biblical passages.

That’s one route. The other route is there’s a lot of passages in the Bible that we clearly do not think pertain to us anymore. You know, so the women covering their hair or not eating lobster or shrimp or shellfish of any kind or mixing your garment cloth, you know, with nylon, with wool or whatever. There’s a lot of passages that we we no longer really abide by, including, and Pentecost I remember in the Pentecostal church where if you were divorced, you could not lead. You could not be a leader of in the church. You could not pastor for sure, but you couldn’t be an elder or anything if you were divorced. Well they’ve relaxed that. It’s like that’s impossible. 50% of marriages end up in divorce. It’s, you know, we’d lose half our pastors and leaders if, you know, we so they they adjust. We adjust over time. And you know, the same with women in ministry. There’s more and more churches are starting to relax because we need pastors. And so they relax that.

And so it’s the same with the LGBTQ community. It’s like you can go the biblical route and debate over the biblical passages, or you can say, you know what, if that’s what they were saying, that was thousands of years ago, no longer applies. and and you know, we need to relax that a little bit, and and recognize something. So that that’s my two-pronged answer to a lot of people who I feel are sincerely curious about what I think about the LGBTQ theology.

But here’s here’s the most fundamental problem, in my opinion, is when a church or anyone excludes, marginalizes, dismisses, rejects a gay person, let’s say gay person or trans person. They’ve revealed a fundamental misunderstanding of what love is, in my opinion. Love, again, in my opinion, is not selective. It’s indiscriminate in a positive way. It’s completely indiscriminate. It’s not sentimental or romantic or Hollywood or based on opinion or taste or desire or preference. It’s love is completely indiscriminate. It’s like Jesus was to have said, it justice is for everyone. It’s like rain falls on everyone, the sun shines on everyone. It’s indiscriminate. Love is the same way. Gravity’s the same way. Gravity’s not selective. Gravity pulls us all in.

And so I think love is that same kind of force. It’s indiscriminate. And everyone is included in this force field of love. And I think that’s what, if you believe in God or not, I think that’s the glue that holds us all together. and and that everybody is included. Yeah, we gotta deal with evil and how that fits, but that’s another issue. For me, love is this all-inclusive indiscriminate power or force or whatever that’s not based on feelings.

And one of my favorite little parables is the sower. And so Jesus is with his disciples and he says, like look at the sower. The kingdom of God is like the sower, and he’s casting his seed, and it goes everywhere. It falls on the rocks, it falls on the path that falls in the weeds, it falls, on good soil, everywhere, right? I think that’s the point of the parable.

That’s the point, not birds come, that’s the devil’s, in the weeds, that’s bad theology, in the whatever. I think that’s secondary. Primarily, it’s the casting of the seed everywhere indiscriminately. He doesn’t go and plant it here and here and here, seed by seed. It’s just like throws it everywhere. And it’s like I do with my grass seed every spring. I go out in the front yard and I just throw it.

And I think that’s what love is. And and so that includes you, me, my gay friends, my trans friends, my black friends, my women friends, my everyone, my atheist friends, my Buddhist friends, my Muslim friends, everybody gets some, you know, to quote what’s her name?

Rev. Ruth Perry (27:29)
Ha ha

David Hayward (27:29)
Everybody gets some. so it’s yeah, to me that’s what love is. And when when people try to exclude groups, then that’s a fatal misunderstanding of what love is. And that’s why I’m continuing to fight on that hill. Because there’s a fundamental misunderstanding of what love is. Oprah Winfrey said everybody gets some. Yeah.

Rev. Ruth Perry (27:48)
Yeah, I totally agree with you. That’s what the further along I get in my faith journey, the more I understand that, it fundamentally is about loving God and loving your neighbor as you love yourself. And love means wanting for my neighbor what I want for myself. And who is my neighbor? It’s everybody else.

David Hayward (28:08)
Yeah.

Rev. Ruth Perry (28:08)
And my first insight into this was that begins with being willing to listen to them, to understand them, instead of imposing my own labels and my own diagnoses and my own understanding of what their situation or their deal is on them. But just to begin by listening to someone’s story and taking their word that they understand themselves far better than I do. And then wanting for them what I would want for myself.

David Hayward (28:35)
Yep. When I post about this quite a bit, cartoon about this quite a bit, but when and then somebody will come on and say, Yeah, but what what is love? Or or they’ll say, Yeah, but what about Muslims, or what about the Haitians who are eating their cats and whatever? And it’s like, That sounds to me like who is my neighbor when when Jesus told the parable, love your neighbor as yourself. And then the religious people are like, Yeah, but who’s my neighbor? And that’s their way of saying, I want to love who I I want to love or should love, like, but like who is that? They fatally misunderstood already. It’s like love is your neighbor, it’s everybody around you.

And I find it interesting that the way Jesus frames the parable he could have said you know the religious people going to the temple and so on and they found a Samaritan in the ditch and helped the Samaritan because there he could have done that but what did he do he switched roles and it was the Samaritan who was the good guy and he was the good Samaritan and how the Samaritan saw that everybody was his neighbor, anybody who was near him or around him at the time. And so I think that’s really fundamental to our understanding of love is it’s everyone. And as soon as you say, yeah, but who exactly, then you’ve taken on the religious mindset, who is my neighbor? And it’s fatal, it’s wrong, it’s divisive.

Rev. Ruth Perry (29:56)
There’s also those who say, well, I’m loving by correcting them and speaking the truth to them.

David Hayward (30:03)
Yeah. Rebranding. I know, I get that all the time, where people just change the definition. You know, where they I’m loving you by, you know. It it sounds like the Inquisitors, the Spanish Inquisitors, the the Inquisitors of the Spanish Inquisition, you know.

Where they’re torturing people for heresy and they’re like, We’re doing this to love you and to save you, you know. So people are, you know, I see the the same attitude these days. Sometimes it really makes me question the idea of progress. Like, have we really progressed, you know, where people are willing to cause people to suffer because of their beliefs? Or lack of beliefs or because of their different lifestyle or whatever. Apparently yeah. So it’s kinda discouraging and demoralizing to see that, how much have we really changed? Even to the point of restoring public executions,

Rev. Ruth Perry (30:56)
Yeah.

David Hayward (30:56)
You know, it’s it’s like, okay, how is this progress? Alarming, wouldn’t you say?

Rev. Ruth Perry (31:01)
Yeah. Or we want to be great again and so then you have to interrogate, well, when were we great? Was it when we had slaves? Was it when women couldn’t vote? Was it, when we were genociding Native Americans? When were we great?

David Hayward (31:14)
Yeah, well there’s many leaders and thought leaders who are suggesting that. And they have a lot of influence, you know, like Hegseth’s spiritual advisor, I forget his name, who believes that

Rev. Ruth Perry (31:25)
Doug Wilson.

David Hayward (31:27)
Doug Wilson, he doesn’t believe women should vote. They should be in the home, you know, etc. etc. I’m not sure what he thinks about LGBTQ, but I can guess. I’m not sure what he thinks about race, but I can guess, you know. It’s almost like, I remember somebody I liked, and we went out, a bunch of us to dinner to a restaurant and everything, and I thought this person was a wonderful person. And then the way they treated the serving staff was like, What? Like so rudely and condescendingly and privilegy and snooty, and I was like, Whoa.

And that wasn’t just that’s just one little aspect. That to me revealed something deeply wrong, deeply wrong with with the person, you know? It’s not just a a little tick or whatever. Something deeply wrong. And it’s the same with Doug Wilson or whoever else, who say, yeah, women shouldn’t vote. Okay, that’s not just a a random idea. This is a peek into something deeply, deeply wrong with their mind,

And so that’s why, like with the LGBTQ it could be the most loving person on the planet, but they’re like, no, LGBTQ aren’t going to heaven. It’s like, whoa, wait, whoa, something deeply wrong there. Something deeply wrong. Disturbingly wrong, you know. So that’s why I keep fighting on this battlefield. I think it’s important. It’s not like some fringe, issue. It’s a fundamental issue, I think.

Rev. Ruth Perry (32:51)
Yeah, I think so too. And one of the most heartbreaking things about it is the moment you say LGBTQ inclusion and those words come out of your mouth, people just shut down and write you off. And that’s a fundamental failure to love. If you can’t even listen to a contrary opinion.

David Hayward (33:08)
Yeah. Yeah. And I don’t bother arguing. Arguing to me is a waste of time. most people who are trying to start a fight with me or argue or whatever, I almost all of them I don’t respond to. Once in a while though, I can tell by the way they’re asking the question that they are genuinely curious. and I’ll I’ll respond to them.

But most people I can tell they just want to start a fight and prove their point. And you know, Jesus was the same way. When he was asked questions, he often responded with a question or slipped away through the crowd. because I think, answering these questions are more like bait. And I’m not gonna bite.

So, but there’s there’s been some moments in my life where they’re like, I really need to understand where you’re coming from because whatever, and then we’ll have a conversation and maybe that will have an impact on them. I don’t know. sometimes it has. So, but most of the time it’s like, I’m not biting, sorry, go fish somewhere else.

Rev. Ruth Perry (34:04)
Yeah, I have a few friends that I have never cut off because I like to extend bridges and keep relationships that constantly message me about my Beautiful Kingdom Builders posts with questions like where is Christ in your work? And like you don’t care that women are being abused in churches. You don’t care that children are being abused in churches. I feel like Christ cares about that. That that’s important ministry, that we not, that we’re hating on the church, but we’re purifying, there ought to be accountability for harm. And we ought to be able to have hard conversations about where the church isn’t meeting the mark or where the church is,

David Hayward (34:45)
Right.

Rev. Ruth Perry (34:46)
you know, not being good news to people.

David Hayward (34:48)
Yeah, I think the spirit of Jesus is present in all that work without the need of having to say the name, I get that a lot too. I just even yesterday, some guy was like, I I already knew where you were coming from when I don’t see Christian in your bio, and okay, whatever. If everybody has to say, hey, I’m a Christian before they start to have a relationship with you.

That’s very interesting to me. But it was I remember learning, I think it was from Eugene Peterson, that in the life of David in the Old Testament, there’s not one miracle. And yet his life, according to Scripture, was miraculous in many ways. I don’t I know David’s on the hot seat because of rape, murder, all that stuff, serious, serious stuff, and we need to look at that seriously. But the whole point of his life sounding or feeling miraculous without any miracles.

And it was the same kind of revelation I had when I realized in Lord of the Rings. There’s no mention of God. There’s no sense of divinity at all in the whole story. And yet it feels full, it feels full of divinity without having to say it. And Tolkien, Charles Williams, C. S. Lewis, and all the they were all Christians. And their work was imbued with divinity or sacredness or whatever, right? Without having to say it. So I would rather remind people of Jesus with my life than me saying Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus all day long.

Rev. Ruth Perry (36:15)
Exactly. And something that I appreciate that you talk about is your desire for authenticity because I’ve recognized like I was not authentic before I started to go through deconstruction. I was a people pleaser and I was codependent and I was telling people what I thought they wanted to hear. And I was doing what I thought I was supposed to do and using scripts that had been written for me and that weren’t coming from my own understanding or beliefs.

And so that process of deconstructing and then reconstructing your faith is so beautiful but arduous. And I think it’s really important that we celebrate that when people start that process and start making faith their own, even if it means maybe they lose their faith in the process, but they’re having an authentic spiritual journey.

David Hayward (37:02)
Yes. you were authentic at that time. We can look back, hindsight’s always twenty twenty, right? But I used to think of growth as kind of linear. We’d move along a line and we’d leave our old stuff behind and kind of like a snail trail, you know? And it would dry up and wither and blow away.

And then I used to think of it as stages where we go up the stages of faith or whatever, and we kind of look down on our previous self and realize we’ve ascended and we’re improved. but that no longer made sense either. So now I think of growth as spatial, where we grow outward, kind of like rings on a tree. And, you know, all those rings are important. You can’t go in and rip out a ring or two or three. They’re all a part of the package, they’re all a part of who you are.

And so, you know, way back when I was in the Pentecostal church and in the Vineyard church and then the Reformed, Presbyterian church and all that kind of stuff. All that’s a part of who I am now. I wouldn’t be who I am now unless I was who I was then. It’s all a part of my story. And I can look back and say, wow, I wasn’t very authentic. At that time I thought I was, though. And I was trying my best to be my best self, but it took some growth to happen.

And so now I’m a larger person, I feel, which includes all my previous stuff, and my job is to somehow integrate that all into my self-understanding, without shame, without guilt, without, you know, whatever, looking back and seeing how all that stuff that I’ve been through and experienced and thought and did.

It’s helped make me who I am today. it’s the culture out of which I’ve grown, And so all those rings of in a tree, like the a couple weeks ago, Elish and I went for a hike and there were some down trees. And I said, I wonder how old that tree is. And so I looked, it was cut across to clear the path. And I could count the rings. And I guess this tree’s about 88 years old. I could tell from the rings.

And some rings are thin and some rings are thicker, depending on the harsh weather or climate or whatever. And but all those rings are an important part of that tree’s history. And it’s the same with you and your story and me and my story. All those rings are important and play a role. And we need to figure out, okay, why was I who I was then? You know, and try to figure out the underlying things and integrate that understanding of ourselves. And, I think it’s a healthy way to look at growth and to process ourselves, you know, and become an individuated adults mature.

Rev. Ruth Perry (39:31)
That’s really beautiful and I think we’re out of time for today, but I really hope that people follow Naked Pastor on social media and go to nakedpastor.com. They can buy prints of your beautiful paintings as well as cartoons.

David Hayward (39:44)
Yeah. Yeah.

Rev. Ruth Perry (39:46)
And I’ll give you the last word today.

David Hayward (39:48)
Well, thanks for having me on and all the best to you and and your church and the your ministry. I love talking with pastors. I was one for thirty years, so it’s really cool to be in touch with people who are doing their best to help make the world a better place. So thank you.

Rev. Ruth Perry (40:04)
Well, I really appreciate your pastor heart and that you’re still serving with so much love and grace. Thank you so much. God bless.

David Hayward (40:10)
You too, Ruth. Thank you.


Did you enjoy this episode? Please subscribe, rate or review us on YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music, Substack, and more! Your support means the world. God bless!

033 I Healing from Patriarchy: Jaime and Josh’s Journey from Marriage is Happening

A couple, Jaime and Josh Fisher, smiling at the beach, with overlay text promoting their appearance on the Beautiful Kingdom Builders podcast discussing marriage and relationships.

I’ve been following Jaime and Josh for a couple years now, enjoying their short reels describing life in the “messy middle” as they dismantle and heal from the patriarchal, purity culture marriage and family framework they inherited, which wasn’t serving them well at all. Both Jaime and Josh have a gift for giving language to their experiences, explaining systems and structures and the impact they have on well-meaning and sincere believers who just want to be the best version of themselves. They are beautifully honest and vulnerable with their stories, hoping to help others avoid the pain they have experienced. Their work is therefore redemptive and holy work and I am so pleased to introduce them to you, if you haven’t come across them on social media before now.

Places to follow Jaime and Josh:
TikTok: Josh and Jaime, Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, and linktr.ee
Email List: https://form.jotform.com/250095854378164
Email: clickingonallfishers@gmail.com

You can find this episode of The Beautiful Kingdom Builders podcast on YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music, Substack, and more!

TRANSCRIPT:

Rev. Ruth Perry (00:15)
My guests today are Jamie and Josh Fisher of Marriage is Happening. Thank you so much for being here today, Jamie and Josh.

Jaime and Josh (00:23)
Thank you, Ruth. We’re really excited.

Rev. Ruth Perry (00:25)
I started watching your videos on Instagram a couple of years ago. And it was a while before that that you started posting them on TikTok, you said. But the thing that drew me to your content is your just spectacular ability to put language to evangelical experience and the teachings that all of us were formed in growing up in purity culture and patriarchy.

And a faith that was so sincere and genuine. And I don’t want to have you on today as an evangelical bashing session. I think people take it that way when they hear any kind of critique of how our teachings impacted our lives. This is not a bashing session, this is the truth of the fruit of these teachings.

Jaime and Josh (01:08)
Yeah.

Rev. Ruth Perry (01:08)
And we need to have these conversations. So thank you so much for being here today.

Jaime and Josh (01:13)
Thanks for inviting us and making the space for this. Yeah, full exploration. Not just bash I have so many positive things I would say that came from my upbringing as well. Sure. The good and the bad. They sit right next to each other real close.

Rev. Ruth Perry (01:25)
Absolutely. Well, can you just start today with sharing your story? Take us all the way back, however much you want to share. Give us a sense of your background and what brought you to the point where you were making videos about marriage and sex and intimacy and all the things you talk about today.

Jaime and Josh (01:42)
Start. Sure. We’re both 43. We were both raised in a church called the Church of Christ. Kind of a conservative, non-denominational. A lot of times we describe it fundamentalist, even I would say Mormon adjacent in that like Mormonism has a really high value on the in-group, the belonging. A lot of religions do, but then also the supremacy of scripture, you know, and a focus on scripture and a lot of time spent together with church people, because those are of course are the people that are going to heaven. They’re your kingdom people. So both of us grew up going to church three times a week. I come from a little bit of a different thing because my family is first generation Christians in that faith, whereas his family actually like descends from some of the founders of this faith. well, pivotal figures, pivotal figures in this. No descendants.

Been around long enough where it might as well have been. And and I think yeah, as anybody who’s kind of looked at religion honestly can say, every faction has a faction, right? So even though we both came from the same denomination, so to speak, even though it was non-denominational, you came from one that was a little bit more liberal and free. Yeah. On top of being a first generation Christian, where my version of that faith was more fundamentalist.

Yeah. And a little bit meaner to be honest. That’s true. You know. And and then also generationally, one of the founders of that particular kind of sect had converted my, great great grandfather, fifth great grandfather on the battlefield of the civil war, right? So it’s like deeply ingrained. It’s not just we just found this because there was a nice place to go and somebody was nice invited me, you know. Yes. And so our experiences are a little different in that upbringing. And so I grew up just believing God had saved me. I also have a pretty traumatic background.

My parents got divorced when I was eleven, but my dad gravitated toward this church, like a lot of narcissists, because narcissistic abusers are so profoundly protected in that space. And I think the narcissists know that. Like, this is a safe space for us because we will be given a platform and a voice and a lot of protection and grace, right? Forgiveness. We need to forgive him for what he’s done. And certainly we should ask his family to forgive him for what he’s done. And so both physical and sexual violence against everyone in our family, but particularly me and my sister and my mom and I have four siblings. And our story is real crazy but it includes everything you can imagine, including kidnapping and drug addiction.

But I also had, so I had a version of church that told my mother, despite the fact that he’s physically abusing us, he’s bankrupting our family, he’s sexually abusing the children, that she needed to stand by him. He needed a good wife, forgives her husband, meets his sexual needs. So he could stop having sex with a seven-year-old if you just meet his needs. Just like a good church. That’s the kind of things they preach, you know? But a real church said that to my mother. And she had the wherewithal to be like I’m getting out of here. These people are nuts.

But even within that church, part of the reason she was able to escape, and I say escape because my dad was like really the most controlling of domestic violence type of men, is there was a preacher who came who was hired by the church. He happened to be blind, but he heard my mom’s story without the presence of any other leaders there and literally took her aside and said, I will help you get out. I know the church leadership, I know what their official stance will be. We’re just gonna help you leave quietly. And his wife and his support gave her the courage to go. And so I watched Bad Church, but I also watched like Good Church. I watched like the teachings of Jesus, like draw near to the oppressed, draw near to the vulnerable and the weak.

And then I watched people risk their career. He got fired eventually for what happened. And he knew that was possibility and he did it anyway. So I watched people come between me and abusive behavior and I watched them sacrifice a lot for that, which is really the message of Jesus. And then I ended up going to a church following that that heard my mom’s story as a divorced woman. That was another threat the church, the original church we had grown up made, like, well as a divorced woman, we cannot accept you. You have s it’s you know, as if this was murder, you know, like you’re a divorced woman, we can’t accept you. And then I went to a new church who not only embraced my mom but really became such a beautiful healing community.

Embraced my four young siblings who we were so scarred. We were so hurt, little wounded little kids. You know what an adverse childhood experience is, it’s like an ACE score. It’s a term used to describe abuse and trauma. I have an A score of nine, which is like getting an A minus in childhood trauma. But there’s also this other thing called a resiliency score. It’s actually factors that come alongside you and can mitigate the harm of trauma. And this church community was truly a massive resiliency factor, not just for me, but for my siblings. And we all agree. So I saw the ugly and also this good and just how profound was. But the good really showed me the love of Jesus. The the good really showed me the redemptive process of love and deliverance. It spoke to me very profoundly. Even as a little kid, I saw that as God’s deliverance. And I saw, that people were willing to stand in for us. So that was a powerful message that deliverance and salvation weren’t just ideas that were ethereal or like the concept. I was delivered from the hands of someone who was horrible to us. And we found safety and even financial security and help in the arms of people who also claimed to walk with Jesus.

So that was a conversion of a different type, but which solidified my allegiance to my faith, from a very young age. And then I would go on to meet Josh at a Christian college. But I wanted to let him tell a little bit more about the So it wasn’t just the Christian church on the good side of the coin that helped you. It’s also your family at a very wide extended family that didn’t necessarily believe the same type of Christianity or practice the same type of Christianity. Some didn’t practice any religion. Right. But they were very loving in practice. Absolutely.

So part of that resiliency factor I think was if you I mean you could explain it better, but was having this wide support system. Yeah. My family of origin, my mom’s side of the family, I would say matriarchal. Right. And I didn’t realize just what an advantage that was. and I use the term matriarchal by definition as a family that focuses on the well-being of the children at the first and foremost, and then all the things that need to line up so that children thrive. Including including the fact that the adults are thriving, right? I mean children are relying on everything from the adults. And so in a matriarchal family.

The circle of support is I didn’t realize just how I also had that in my life and just what a beautiful example that is. But also how much tension that would bring our marriage and that Josh was raised in probably the most epitome of patriarchal fashion. That’s why I wanted to bring it up. So that’s a very important context. Yes. Just w how different we’re But there’s a lot of differences culturally. Yeah, I think you knew. I saw it. Yes. Yeah, for sure. But in contrast, I mean we joke all the time that Jamie should write a book about her life and she always downplays it, so I think we should be called Nothing to See Here by Jamie.

But my life and my upbringing extremely boring in contrast. But but very playbook Americana. A two-parent household. We both come from families of four kids. We’re both the oldest of four. So we both kind of slightly parentified. You actually parentified, I think, in many ways. And so we had this kindred spirit of we understand what it’s like to be in that role. But man, my family, very patriarchal, not just in terms of its influence on the church. my mom’s side of the family, my maternal family is actually the one that brought this religiosity with a focus on making sure that men are comfortable to the relationship. So she is a sweetheart of a woman, does her very, very best at all circumstances to make sure that my dad doesn’t have to feel discomfort at all. And as a first generation Christian, that was very appealing, I think.

To think now I have a place to belong. He’d also come from a lot of family trauma in his family of origin with a lot of unfortunate his his mother had died at a very young age. His sibling had also died of cancer at a very young age. So I think he was lost and then found. But he was found in a way that centered him and his needs and his comfort. And so I grew up in that. And I think the contrast between how Jamie grew up and I grew up, I think we both arrived at 18 in college, kind of looking at her life and thinking, well, it’s a miracle that you have turned out as well as you have, given all that adversity and all the things that aren’t God’s plan. Right. And I wouldn’t say that any of that is God’s plan or not.

You know, I don’t want to get into that. But I would say that for me, I internalize that I’m the one coming from stability and I’m the one that has some tools and I can offer these things to you. And it was quite the opposite in practicality. But we were both in the environment of a church that talks about, if you’re a man, you need to be taking leadership roles. And if you’re a woman, you need to take a step back. And so I think that even in our dating life, we weren’t as bad as we were as when we got married in terms of this dynamic, because there’s so much rhetoric around what it means to be a good husband and to make yourself bigger and to be a good wife and make yourself smaller.

And so I think we found ourselves very early on married young with a lot of bad information. And to be quite honest, I think we got married in part because in fundamentalist Christianity, especially in purity culture circles, you’re not allowed to not even just have sex, you’re not even supposed to be exploring your sexuality. You’re not supposed to about it, you’re not even supposed to think about it. Right. So you get to this spot really quickly, which is crazy. It is crazy. I can’t even imagine telling teenagers that. But it’s also so common, right? There’s

Rev. Ruth Perry (10:28)
Ha ha.

Jaime and Josh (10:28)
so many of us that that found ourselves in that spot. And so I think from there, I don’t know that we need to go through every leg of the journey, but it started off poorly in terms of our communication, in terms of our needs. Jamie had a very clear idea of values that she wanted to have for herself and for our family, and then extended into her kids. And a lot of that had come from this really beautiful tapestry that was woven together by a wide support system and maternal values. And then I’m over there thinking, like, well, yeah, but you’re the one that comes from the broken family, right? I’m the one that has the stability. So maybe we should try more of what I His family did everything right. Right.

My family did everything wrong. Right. And that was And it’s just by the grace of God that we came out. Okay, but should listen to him because his family did things right. Yeah. But the thing is, that’s repeated in culture. I mean, part of the reason we got married, so I mean, very frankly, in our dating life we broke up a lot because I was really uncertain about being together, because I saw very clearly our differences, our value differences, our family of origin differences, and really did not think it lent itself to compatibility. I thought you were a very good person. I admired you greatly.

But I was like, I don’t know if we should mesh our lives. We’re so different. Yeah. And Well, and I of course didn’t listen to her because there’s nobody in our circles that says, Hey, as a man, you should really take the voice of a woman seriously, especially if it’s in contrast to what you want. Because so much of a man is like, you should pick what you want and go after it. Put your head down, keep working hard, prove yourself worthy. In fact, the harder it is, the more you can martyr yourself, the higher the value. We saw Jesus, he’s on the cross, he’s dying, he’s suffering a wound in his side, and he has to pick a new mom for his best friend. That’s pretty tough. So be like that guy. And the more pain you can experience, the more hardship it is, the more difficult the task, the more worthy you can prove your own masculinity. So, of course, as an 18-year-old who come across this person who is bright and sparkly and despite all of these awful things, is able to walk in and change the temperature of a room and see people. And I desperately want to be seen.

And I’ve never seen anybody who can do that to the degree that she does. And I have valued myself as a high achieving student and a high achieving athlete and a high achieving Christian, so to speak, because I’m taking it very sincerely, very seriously, that like I I’m making my choice. And so if you don’t want this, so what? I will prove myself worthy because this fits the rubric of how to be a successful, not just man, but Christian man.

In my limited less than two decades of experience, and let’s go all in on the chips, right? So I just kept telling her, it’ll be fine, we’ll work it out. And you can, we have. But I don’t know that either of us would go back and think that’s a good idea. Like, yeah. So no. So all of my hesitations, all of my reservations about our compatibility, I would try to the best I my 20-year-old self and the language I had at the time to communicate to him.

And he would, A, take that as a challenge, kind of like, well, she’s playing hard to get. And as a man, I’ve been taught the fairy tales say keep going after her. And then I questioned myself though, because both church culture and wider culture says that you’ve experienced abuse, you have daddy issues. You can’t trust your own voice. Because look at you, you’ve been injured. You are morally harmed. And so those voices that you have, those hesitations, even in church language, those might be the voice of the devil, right? Because look at you, you’ve got this good, godly man in front of you.

And he’s got integrity. He is just so faithful. And you don’t like him. This could be from the enemy. Right. Right. Yeah, yeah. Maybe you don’t know what’s best for you. And and and also, you’re just a little, a little woman. I mean, women can get just so confused, right? They’re led astray so easily. Look at that Eve. She ate that fruit. Look at her go. She’s just out there making mistakes.

So I had this pretty strong inner voice that was like this isn’t for you. And even stronger after I met his family. I was told and my whole life I can’t tell you how many lectures I sat through where they’d be like, and God’s vision for the family is two parents. Except for you, Jamie, I understand your circumstances, but let’s not follow her mother’s example. I was actually used as an example in Bible studies, cause everyone else’s parents were married, and I had to sit there and nod and be like, absolutely, my family is the sinners, but we’re here at your graces. Yeah. Us poor lowly sinners, our my single mother.

And I started to view that way that somehow I was lacking because I had this single parent, which is so ironic because we both agree now of the two of us, I was parented more thoroughly. I was parented with more love. I just came out with much more skill, much more community, more capacity. I felt loved both emotionally and physically, the belonging I had from a parent who worked not just hard herself, but actually a meshed us into community, knowing that she wasn’t going to be enough and that children need more. And so I was actually raised, honestly I would say he was not raised. I would say he had parents that are like, we give you a roof and you have food.

Hopefully that’s good enough ’cause I’m the wife and all of my energy is spent on this man over here. And the children are kind of left to their own devices, to be honest. There was it’s more complicated than not not much. Yeah. I think all we need to know is that really from that kind of cradle, we started a relationship. We got married young, ’cause I was definitely I wanted Jaime to be my life partner. I’m like, this is the person I want. We both have an alignment in our faith. And I can tell this is a really special person. This is not somebody you just let go. And also, yeah, at 21 years old, we’re been dating now on and off, but mostly on for a couple of years. And it’s like, well, physical things are starting to kind of you know ramp up as they do. And I’m tired of trying to be the quote unquote good guy to shut things down because I’m trying not to make a fool of you. I’m trying to respect your family, I’m trying to honor God.

I’m sure right. Yeah. So all these things that again out of I guess you mentioned my family, this part is important. They did lay some groundwork of what they thought was important and then expected us to go do those things. And a lot of those things were achievement-based, right? So this doesn’t fall out of that category. I wanted to achieve being a good Christian more than I wanted to achieve being a good lover, for sure, right? Like there were moments where it would get kind of hot and heavy, and I would shut it down thinking, this is my job.

And nobody told me that that’s not something you can just kinda flip the switch back on. Right. It’s like once you get married ’cause we’re talking when we were dating. When we’re dating, right. If we started to explore any lines of sexuality, yeah. He was very big on absolutely not. This is the sinful. We can’t do that. Yeah. Anyway, it started this and I think this is gonna be a very common thing for a lot of folks. Not everybody, but

It started an unhealthy relationship to our own sexual relationship, our own communication, a lot of disappointment, a lot of letting each other down, a lot of not understanding why things weren’t working. And then again, the church’s answer to that is well, marriage is the solution. Just get married and you’ll just figure it out. You’ll have time and space and God will lead you. Don’t worry. Don’t worry. You don’t have to learn high quality communication. You don’t have to learn better language. God’s just gonna lead. Yeah.

Well I’m laughing just because this is the things I really believed. Yeah, suffice to say he he did not. He did not. The Lord. We really struggled. And then again, based on the messages I’d gotten in patriarchal society as what it meant to be a good man, is you just don’t give up. You just keep putting your head down. You just keep trying. You asked. You don’t gain new skills. You don’t gain new skills. You put your head down. You don’t show curiosity. Or if you do, it’s so minimal as to say that you tried and made an effort, but mostly just do the things you know that worked for you in the past and don’t think that maybe you know, the same mistakes that are coming from that are gonna be repeated if you don’t change anything. You just wait

And hopefully. All the things that are bad you call the devil. All the things that are good you call from God. And this way you never actually have to explore what’s really happening. Right. Right. You don’t have to ask big questions. Yeah. You don’t have to look for big answers. Yeah. You get to stay c actually kind of comfortable. I was deeply uncomfortable, but he was like, This keeps me comfortable? And that’s a good point. Because I think that again, the church’s message, and again, maybe healthier churches have better messages. I have no doubt that that’s the case. But the messages we got were both that I should not have to be in that discomfort, right?

As a man who’s doing all the quote unquote things right. I’m checking all the boxes, right? I I’m not just going to church. I’m the person who’s preparing the Bible study. And I’m not just going to school. I’m getting the A’s. And I’m not just going to work. Yeah we’re doing all these things right. That man, that type of man in society, is entitled to a certain level of comfort and care. I certainly saw again in my family of origin, people who were less qualified getting many perks.

So it followed to me to think of course this is just how it’s supposed to go. And did I think at 21 when we’re getting married that this is gonna be like a a lifelong struggle? No. Did I know on some level that she wasn’t doing well? If I’m answering honestly, yes. But I was not brave enough or courageous enough to stop and ask questions about what that was or why that was happening, or what I could do differently and leave space for that. I was just really afraid of not achieving. So I would rather

Get an incomplete, then get an F. And so when she brought things up that were really important, it was very common for me to dismiss them. No, no, that can’t be true. Because I’m starting from the premise that I’m a good person and that marriage is forever. So, then we have to work backwards. If you’re dissatisfied, I need concrete language in ways that I understand, because that’s that’s how it works, right? Like I’m a man and it needs to work the way that I understand it.

I can’t possibly imagine anything as a man that I haven’t seen before. So she had different language and different skills and different communication. And I showed no curiosity about that because I was so afraid of not meeting the standard of what I thought it meant to be a good person. And I didn’t want to go to hell. And I didn’t want to, not have friends, and I didn’t want to not have a relationship. So I just chose instead to keep using the energy flow that she would give me and the support she would show me.

And translate that into external, for lack of a better term, works, right? I’m gonna go in and high achieve in and school further. I’m gonna go like community serve over here. I’m gonna go help fix this nonprofit because if I can’t fix what’s happening in my home, we’ll just hope and pray. And then all these other things will still be points in my bucket that I’m still doing a good job.

I’m a good man. Let me go. And then you add kids to that mix as a young couple. We moved across country. And of course it went fabulously, right? So it just started to cycle on each other where I got deeper and deeper in this martyrdom of not doing well, but thinking that maybe that made me a valuable man, Christian husband. And you, I think, being more and more uncomfortable and dissatisfied, but not knowing how to speak back to me because I wasn’t listening. I had no incentive to or I should say I had no relational skill.

To be able to sit in the discomfort that was going to be required to grow. And it wasn’t until Jamie started putting up like very, I think, clear boundaries about like, I’m not doing this anymore, I’m not doing it this way, I’m not doing this with you. I thought, like, okay, well now the rubric has shifted. I’m not mature enough yet to think about what does my life look like if I can’t achieve. But if it’s clear my grades are now coming through where I thought were incomplete, they are failing.

Okay, well then I need to do something about it. And I can say honestly that I didn’t start that from a place of I really genuinely want you to do better, as much as I was coming from a place of I want to be doing better. Right. This is my security. It’s not okay. Yes. So that was a Which also went over real well. Yeah, yeah.

Rev. Ruth Perry (21:00)
What did do they say? We don’t change anything until staying the same becomes more painful than going through the change.

Jaime and Josh (21:06)
Yes. Yes.

Rev. Ruth Perry (21:08)
And I’m really resonating with that performance based faith where I was raised to believe I was not legalistic or fundamentalist. We always said we’re not like the fundamentalists, but we were 100% fundamentalist and that performance-based aspect of the faith where I was gonna be a good girl no matter what. And I was gonna conform and perform and I got all the gold stars in church and in my family. but then kind of a similar thing, I got married young and the ways that I had been formed and trained in my evangelical background were not producing good fruit.

Jaime and Josh (21:42)
That’s it.

Rev. Ruth Perry (21:42)
And as the woman, I was the first one to recognize that because it was the brunt of it was on me. And it’s the same thing for you, Jamie. Can you talk about what your marriage was like while you’re still under these patriarchal and good Christian frameworks?

Jaime and Josh (21:57)
Yeah, I think as Josh alluded to, ironically, our dating life wasn’t reflective, like the problems weren’t as clear only because once we took on the role of the titles of husband and wife, we tried to lean into the teachings and ideas that had been assigned to those roles. Rather than organically looking at our strengths and weaknesses and then assigning things in marriage based on our real humanity.

We just tried to live into the ideals of roles we had been given. And I struggled a lot because honestly, I had a single mom for most, a lot of my formative years. And then all the women in my family are real strong and I would say even sassy. And then also very beautifully incredibly generous though. The women do set the tone and temperature of my family of origin, but to the benefit of all, I they really do analyze the group and then make adjustments. But everyone’s tide rises when those women get together, they take action together. And then, very beautifully, the men I had witnessed actually support that work because they realize they benefit from it. The tide is raising all the boats, including their own. The kids are benefiting, they’re benefiting.

And the women are better. So the the men really come alongside and lift that up. And gosh, what a beautiful example. But rare, I think. although I will say I’d love to talk about this more some other time, but I think more common in New England families. I’m from Connecticut. and I see this actually a good deal in New England families. There’s a lot of reasons, but you’re having to shovel snow. There’s a ruggedness to New Englanders, when there’s a lot of labor, it’s just all hands on deck. Also my family of origin doesn’t have strict gender roles in terms of well, the woman does everything in the home and the man like absolutely not. I saw women build sheds, I saw women change and I saw men cook casseroles. I saw men take over the whole dinner and clean it up. And vice versa.

I’d seen women do this too, but I had not seen strict roles in my family aversion but I had been taught it in church and so because people had told me you’ve got to worry about yourself Jamie because look at all the things you’ve come from so you’re new to the faith you’re new you’re new to the faith so listen to the people have been in so I was really trying hard. I was reading all the books. I was going to women’s Bible study. I was trying so hard to be a good wife and very quickly I think the first time I sobbed in regret of our marriage was literally six weeks in and I was just like, and I said it. I said, I regret getting married. I was just crying.

And I did not have words for all the dynamics that were beginning to take hold in us. But I was playing smaller in ways I didn’t really even mean to. And we were just talking recently about how I would have been better off as a young mother, as a single mom, because I would have made sure I was okay first and never considered him, but because when the kids are small, there’s so much bandwidth that caretaking takes up. After caretaking, I really just needed to think if I was okay. I we just we both needed to be asking, is she okay? And then really just modify all of life around that. Yeah. because that is so laborious and so all consuming. But because I was a good Christian wife, I had this massive bandwidth for caretaking and then also was constantly like I’m like, how can I nurture a marriage? Is he okay? Which literally left no bandwidth for am I okay? And I was not.

Yeah. And I was still taking that love and support you were giving and then translating it through my poor theology again to then externalize that out, right? So he’s like, I’ll take on more hours at work. I’ll take on harder projects at work. I’ll volunteer more in the community. why my gosh, my wife just fills my cup. Let me take it and pour it everywhere else. And so Well, I I important to note though, that’s not necessarily even like what I would be doing, I think, with my natural skill set. I think I just thought I was supposed to be doing that. Right. So I was depleting myself and then thinking I’m not doing well, but at least I have somebody who’s coming and filling my cup back up, and then still not where I I don’t there’s not really an excuse for it. I just know was doing poorly and then without the skill to be able like to ask who’s filling her cup up. I wasn’t in a good space, but I certainly wasn’t creating a good space for our family.

So I think I would have benefited from a different interpretation of theology, but it would have said, like, where do you find the place where you light up and light the world up? Not a place where it’s the hardest for you to go and do something, because I brought all that baggage back. And that I was maybe the worst version of myself relationally, already lacking a foundation of good skills coming to this relationship. So some of what we talk about online is definitely this systemic problem, right? That we’re all finding ourselves ourselves in that you can be a good willed person and have negative impacts. And that’s not something I had acknowledged early on. You can also be a good willed person and have all the systems around you be toxic. And then you’re swimming upstream to try to do things right. So I think ultimately the question that you asked at the outset about how did we get to start telling the story online, you noted Ruth was that you as the wife in the relationship noticed first that this is not working, right?

And clearly Jamie just articulated the ways in which she started to think, this is not working from the very beginning. And then kids became kind of this distraction and we’re trying to like figure it out. But as the kids got a little bit older and there was just a little tiny bit more rest in there, I think it was evident to Jamie, I’m not doing this anymore. I’m not gonna continue to support this in the same way because it’s not working. It’s not working for anybody. And if you can’t see that because you’re so dedicated to continuing to martyr yourself, I can’t control that.

But I think that a huge value of yours as well is transparency. And so it’s almost like a flip switch. Not that you changed, but I’ll put it this way. You mentioned a second ago that your family, the women control the temperature of the family. Yeah. In a in a way that benefits everybody. Yes. We had been operating in rooms where I had been controlling the temperature and it was way too hot. Or we have been adjusting to his temperature. And if we didn’t, he would often like kind of like a lot of men do, like kind of like pout emotionally like not like was he was never abusive, which actually I found my twenties wish I’m like, I wish this man would just hit me. I wish it ’cause then I would know and also I knew ’cause it you’re in church, right?

I had the desire to leave our marriage in our late twenties a lot, but I just knew I’d lose everything. ‘Cause all my friends were in church. Even my own mother, was a single mother, but very, very male centered single mother. I don’t know how to put that, just very much like would talk about her life as in I messed everything up, but someday you’re gonna find a godly man in a godly marriage and that you’ll do the right thing that I couldn’t do. That’s how she would talk about her life, which is so funny because she provided one of the most incredible childhoods that I’ve ever, ever even heard of. And yet she actually would sit here and has so much shame about what she perceives as a massive failure because church.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah. but I would say that we handed the thermostat over to you, not because I thought this isn’t working and I’m paying attention. It was like I’m taking control of the thermostat. I just said like I’m just not doing this anymore. Yeah. I’m sorry. I don’t care about We are not alone. Some of this is individual failure. Some of this, a lot of this is bad information, some of this is the systems that have surrounded us.

But all of this is probably relatable to other people. And if we could put this stuff out there as we’re trying to work it out, we started making videos and that this probably a through line even to today. We’re not making these videos saying we figured it all out. No. Or like we know what the answer is, or that we even saved our marriage. It really started from a spot of we really effed this up. And both of us tried so hard not to. Yeah. And the pain of that is so exhaustive and extensive that I wanted to bury my head in the sand. I wanted to bury my whole body in the sand. Like, don’t tell anybody this. But I think Jamie had a much better head on her shoulders about like, no, that shame isn’t gonna do anybody any good. What if we just started telling the truth? And she was very clear, you don’t have to come along on this journey with me. I don’t want to make you uncomfortable, but I feel a deep desire to tell the truth about like what has happened here. And the more I thought about that, I was like, you’re right.

We got into this jam over the course of years, because I haven’t listened to you, and I know that you’re a smart person and a wise person and have all these beautiful ideas. And for whatever reason, well lots of reasons we’ve already articulated, but none of them good enough, I haven’t been influenced by them. And so now we’re here at this crossroads, and I’m going to make a different decision. I’m going to say, yeah, I think you’re right. If we got in trouble by not listening to you, then maybe the only way back out is by allowing you to have the influence, which I deeply believe is true. I just haven’t been able to be humble enough to accept in this performative masculinity.

So that was how we started telling our story because we actually started telling stories separately. Yeah, we both had separate TikTok accounts. Yeah. And told our own perspectives. So even now, there’s some people that follow us individually in TikTok that don’t know we’re married to each other. Although I think that doesn’t happen as often. Yeah. But for a couple of years at the beginning, people like, my gosh, I saw this guy who talks about patriarchy in his car. And I’m like, that’s my husband. and they would, you know.

And they’re like, you’re married to each other. And and so people would find us separately, us just really talking openly and honestly about our journey. And for me, the honest conversation, because once again, I had gone through very traumatic things and recognized that experiencing community was one of the healing elements. People coming alongside of you and either saying me too or loving you anyway, knitted me back together in really dark seasons of life.

And so I knew for a fact, I don’t think we’re individual failures here. Both of us as oldest children and as so committed to the Lord in all the ways we possibly could think of had so earnestly tried and then so earnestly failed. No one had tried harder. And it still didn’t work. And so I was like, I think this is a system that surrounds us. Like the language that surrounded us failed us, the systems around us failed us.

Even things like not having paid parental leave. With our very first baby, I had severe birth injuries. I was literally crawling around on the ground caring for an infant, but he didn’t have a single day of paid leave. And we were young in our 20s. We could not afford to have no money. So here I am, days postpartum, literally unable to walk, unable to walk caring for an infant. I shouldn’t have even been allowed to be alone with myself.

Let alone with an infant. Right. And but that’s the United States of America. It’s it’s a profound cruelty toward parents. It’s a profound cruelty that this entire country exacts on young families. And so he was a goodwilled man, but he couldn’t take a day off. So his goodwill went to work, but then here I am by myself. And again, I don’t I don’t know. As a man, like the bar is so low.

So I wanted to be a good man. And then what is the rubric for that? Okay, well, most guys aren’t taking any time off twenty years ago or don’t have the time off. So the fact I took a week off and unpaid, that must be okay. That must be good enough, right? And and then right back into the grind of doing a job that, is very important, but like took everything from me. So I do have a lot of empathy for men on some level who are trying to like work through this because this is really the first generation we’re being called to account. And some of this accountability really does rest on society in ways that they don’t have individual power over. And yet, it’s also just like the very first little glimpse, fluttering of an eye waking up to a reality that women have been here the entire time to. So on that side of the coin, I have zero empathy. I’m like, shut up. Get over it. Wake up. Do the work because we’re not special. We’re just late, right?

So I think that some of this comes through in our content because we’re trying to put this information out. And I’ve already seen in the handful of years we’ve been doing it that some of these needles have already started to move. There’s a time where we will post an older video and maybe a younger generation will be like, How could you even have believed that? I’m like, like, that’s amazing. Yeah, we love that. We love that you’ve never heard that idea. That’s that’s wonderful.

But for those of us who are still struggling through it, we really want to make sure people know that they’re not alone and that there are pathways to navigate it. They they are not easy. I mean, there’s been many a day on this journey of trying to like make reparations relationally where I thought like I don’t know if I’m strong enough to do this or I don’t know if it’s worth it. And then you stop and think like what’s the alternative? Of course it’s worth it. Like this this like you’re somebody that matters to me. But I had to get past this point as a man where the work was no longer about transaction. Again, being very honest at the very outset of this, I wanted to do the right things because I wanted to be perceived as a good person.

And I also wanted the achievement of being in a marriage and I wanted to be viewed as somebody who was admired and successful, right? Like, but it wasn’t about like making sure you were okay still. Like and so it had to get to this point of time where it’s like, I to fully accept that even though I didn’t mean to have the harm and the impact I have had, that it has had that impact, and therefore I have no right to certainly to demand anything in return, but not even to expect it really. I’m gonna do this work because it’s the right thing to do.

I had my bearings on my ship in the wrong direction. I was always trying to do the right thing, but maybe for the wrong people. Like maybe the people closest to me in my own household should have benefited first and whatever I had left over then could have gone out into capitalism. But I was doing it the opposite way because of the way the reward systems were incentivized, right? So I don’t know. I I hope it does help people. Aand we talk about topics all over the map from parenting to, sex life to just systems issues and faith.

I don’t know, Ruth. I’m curious. You said you’ve watched some of the videos. I don’t know if there’s any particular videos that come to mind that, you know, you were struck by or Or had overlaps with your own relationship. It sounds like when you got married young as well. So it sounds like you also as a young wife ran into the the burnout and yeah, what overlaps does it have with your experience? And then what overlaps did it have, like maybe certain specific topics kind of reach you? I’m just curious about that.

Rev. Ruth Perry (34:20)
Honestly, I don’t think I’ve ever watched one of your videos and not related to it. There’s so much overlap because the conditioning in the culture of the Christian church in America is so strong, and you don’t recognize that you’ve been conditioned into a culture. You just think that you’re being faithful to God. And so that layer of the eternal aspect of our salvation is so impactful too.

So I had the scripts from my church that I was handed, and the scripts from my family, where there’s a strong traditional gender role demonstrated for me with a really authoritarian father and a very submissive mother. And my husband came from a same very different like I’m from New England, I’m from Maine, my husband’s from the South, Pentecostal, and I’m Baptist. And so that we had a lot of differences, but we had purity culture, we had

patriarchy and all these scripts. And now as I look back, it’s heartbreaking because everything we needed to have a healthy, mutually beautiful relationship was right there in the scriptures. If we had just obeyed the one another commands and considered each other better than ourselves and loved each other and served each other and mutually submitted, you know, if we had recognized that God gave man and woman dominion instead of thinking that I was a subordinate helper, like an assistant,

Jaime and Josh (35:37)
Right.

Rev. Ruth Perry (35:38)
and just all these like terrible things that warp your reality. And the fruit is clearly bad. The day I cried was the first day back from our honeymoon when my husband went to work and I stayed home to do the laundry and the dishes. And I wept that day. It was like day one. And just immediately recognized I’m losing something of my humanity in these scripts.

Jaime and Josh (35:59)
Yeah.

Rev. Ruth Perry (35:59)
But then not having the language to understand my experience for so long. So just over functioning and doing it all and being the primary parent and the person who keeps an immaculate home and beautifully cooked meals, doing all the things and serving in my church too and making our community connections and having people over for meals and just way over functioning. And it’s impacted my health. And for me, I think the biggest thing has been menopause where my hormones have fluctuated to the point where I can’t do it anymore.

Jaime and Josh (36:30)
Mm-hmm.

Rev. Ruth Perry (36:30)
And so we’re changing course now. And it seems like it happened sooner for you because you’re smarter probably. But it’s not sustainable.

Jaime and Josh (36:38)
I don’t think so. Yeah. Yeah. Sustainable. I think too, it’s funny, I look at just different generations and I look at the people right above me and what they were given and how the scripts manifested and subsequently what they had access to in terms of freedom. And then I look at even just right below me and the women coming up through evangelical that are in their mid thirties and how actually there’s more freedom and there’s more health, even there than there was for me. And I just I have empathy for all of us on that journey. And I actually feel a

Rev. Ruth Perry (37:05)
Yeah.

Jaime and Josh (37:05)
a spark of deep luck that I’m not just ten years older. Because I think I would have I would have spent so many more years in this servitude over functioning burnout role. Right. I feel so grateful that I had that family of origin that’s actually not Christian, but matriarchal. And so I knew, I watched women have full thriving. I watched women have full fun. I watched women have a life. I watched women that my women in my family aren’t subservient and they’re not burnt out. They have deep joy and great beautiful connections. And so I very quickly was like,

I’m good. Like after the burnout kinda sent in and I realized okay, these kids are getting a little older and I’m gonna make plans to get divorced. Like that’s what I’ll do. ‘Cause I was probably only thirty, thirty-one, thirty-two at the time and realized if this is what life is gonna be like with him, then it’s not for me. I have a lot of life left and I don’t want it if this is what it’s gonna look like. So I kinda started making those plans.

Quiet quitting our relationship and also starting to talk about a relationship like that. I didn’t want to hurt him because I knew all the reasons why he behaved the way he did, and I had empathy for it. And even a deep amount of love for him. But I also knew I would not tolerate his wounds becoming my pain any longer. I also had tried to meet those wounds. Forever, I overfunctioned as a means of if I just do enough, he’ll stop being so wounded and start seeing me. If I just do enough, he will start listening more. He’ll take me seriously.

And I realized like, no, he’s performing for an audience of the script of patriarchy and of Christianity and also of manhood that has nothing to do with me. A script I did not give him. A script I had no say in its writing. And no matter how hard I work, it does not matter. All the things that deeply kind of hurt him and I knew his pains and I didn’t want to add to it. But then I realized I’m getting sucked into it. I am now like a like black hole. Yeah. Vicariously being wounded through those things and that’s not a life for me.

And so I started talking like, the kids are older and we get divorced and he was shocked. And I was like, I don’t know why you’re shocked. I’ve been here for over ten years just trying to talk with you and you won’t have a conversation. So I won’t live that way permanently. I I want to see these I want to give the kids stability. I want to see it through. I’d been a stay-at-home parent so I had no career to speak of or no money. So I’m like, I’m gonna give myself some time to get that together and then I’m gonna go. Yeah. You know that was a wake-up call for me for sure.

I think that even the way you just worded it a second ago of like you won’t have a conversation, would not have been a way I would have even remotely have considered that to be true because I’m like, No, I’m always here to have a conversation. But my conversation style was very patriarchal, very much learned, very much ingrained that like in order to take something seriously, you must combat it. It’s gotta be had out in a legal forum, basically. So you present your exhibit, I present my exhibit, we go back and forth, and eventually the jury will decide, and the tiebreaker vote is mine because it’s patriarchy.

So, yeah, if you say something really wise and it makes me uncomfortable, I can dismiss it. If you say something really smart and I need to think about it, well, I can think about it, but I can come back later and not consider it. I didn’t realize, I would have told you that very first time you mentioned that that was your plan. I was like, what are you talking about? I am committed to this relationship. I am engaged. I am trying, but I didn’t have no clue like that I had shut you down to such an extent that you were no longer even trying to communicate important truths to me because it was too painful to.

Bring something up like that and then be dismissed again, right? So if I could change one thing, it might just be that. I might just go back and tell like every man, hey, look, this should be so, so obvious, but apparently it is definitely not, which is as a man, especially if you have stacked upon stacked unearned privileges, the way you see the world is not not only not the only way to see the world, it’s probably not even an accurate way to see the world, right? So when people are trying to communicate to you, it is very important not just to take them seriously, but to shut up and leave space for that and sit in that uncomfortability. There’s a lot of what they’re gonna be telling you that’s not gonna match your perspective. It’s not gonna match your experience. And that doesn’t make it invalid. I did that all the time to you as a a younger person. Well I’ve never seen that.

Yeah, yeah. It doesn’t affect me that way. I don’t think it doesn’t matter. Well I didn’t ever said that, but that’s how it would be internalized because I again and I this is gonna sound so stupid, but I really always thought in a combative kind of way of finding a middle ground. Well, devil’s advocate, whatever you want to call it. And a best case in patriarchal circles is also loud and overbearing and a little bit mean sometimes. ‘Cause I’m gonna try to win. I’m gonna attack you. Because attacking you means I win. Yeah, yeah. And I and I’m trying to win because I care. And it’s like, no there’s no winners in this. Believe me, we’re both losing right now, but you can’t see that. My gosh. You think just because you got louder and I shut down, you won. I still struggle with this by working really hard on it.

I think that if I go back and we we talk about this a lot, if I were to watch the tape of some of our early first year marriage conversations, I think you wouldn’t be shocked at all. I think I would just weep. Because there were so many times where I thought I was just trying to engage in a conversation with the very limited tool belt I’d been given. And Jamie would just be like, I’m walking away. And I thought, well, that’s not the way I thought it was supposed to go, but I guess

I guess it doesn’t matter to her. No, no, no. It mattered tremendously. It just the skills I brought to the table about how to talk about it were so stunted and so underdeveloped that she couldn’t have a real adult conversation with a child. And like, whatever. Like the way you would kind of yeah, I mean, have a maybe a toddler come to your house and you know, they’re calling outside the lines, you’d be like, Okay, well, I’ll just clean it up later. Yeah, that’s kinda It’s not worth this kid I’d have no relationship with and no influence over to kind of fight about little things.

It is what it is, right? Looking back, I think that I was the toddler, but I thought I was a full grown person, right? So, it’s just really, really sad. And I’ve cried many tears over that over the years of like I just wish there had been a different guidebook. I wish there would be somebody, somebody, one person in my life that would have told me. And I think, there were, but they were women. I just was trained to dismiss those voices. And I think that many men are still trained to dismiss those voices. So to even have a shot at being a man who contributes to this conversation, I hope matters, you know.

Rev. Ruth Perry (42:34)
It matters a lot. I’m really, really grateful for your voice, Josh, and I love your series. Chronicles of a clueless husband. I just love

Jaime and Josh (42:41)
yeah.

Rev. Ruth Perry (42:42)
both of your honesty so much. The truth sets us free.

Jaime and Josh (42:45)
Yes.

Rev. Ruth Perry (42:45)
Has it just been conversations or are there particular resources that have helped you build your tool belt?

Jaime and Josh (42:52)
It helped that I was in the mental health field, so I had access to some of these things on the professional side. But I think therapy was huge. I went through multiple rounds of clinical work. The first time really just thinking, I should do this just so I know what it feels like. And the second time thinking, I think I have a deep amount of grief.

And then third time you’re like, I think I don’t have a secure attachment. But it needed to start with just the humility to try it. I did not have even being in a social services, human services field, the wherewithal or wisdom or maturity or humility to think that I really needed that, but I needed to get into the habit of it until eventually got to a point where you could pick specific modalities, right? It’s like, okay, I really want to target this like deep seated feeling of unworthiness as a man. Where did that come from?

I’m gonna pick a memory from childhood and go back and unpack that through EMDR. Really tangible work. So I’m glad you asked that question because I think sometimes people think, well, it maybe it just occurred to him and and now it’s better. No, no, no. If you’re gonna dig yourself out of a six foot grave, you need the tools to do that, but it’s gonna require an awful lot of work and an awful lot of help. You don’t get out of that hole by yourself. So I think it’s a great therapy has been huge for me.

And I would tell people that if you’re gonna go to the therapy route, you can’t be going because someone else is telling you to go. You gotta be going because you are deciding to go. And hopefully you are clear on what your presenting issue is. You don’t have to fix all of your problems at once, but pick one and start there and then commit to doing the work on it. And that work might take months, it might take years, right? I actually also am not a huge, huge fan of having a therapist indefinitely. I’ve had like five different therapists over the course of the last like decade and a half, and they all specialize in something different.

Because I’ve needed different things at different points in time. So make it work for you. I’d also say that having a partner like Jamie who’s just incredibly smart and skilled and loving and full of grace is certainly a a resource that a lot of people don’t have, right? So I mean, most of what I’ve learned, people like, did you get that from school? Or did you get that from I’m like, No, I got it from her. Even in social work sometimes I’ll share something and well, that’s really wise. Where’d you get that? Oh, my wife told me that. That’s where I learned that from. So she’s a great partner to have.

I think for me, particularly in my thirties, as I got to my thirties, I started to listen to a lot of podcasts, seeking out a lot of books, particularly on the topic of sexuality, like She Comes First, I think that’s Emily Nagoski, was really pivotive and transformative. I think the work of Glennon Doyle and even Jen Hatmaker, sort of that vulnerability voice and the truth telling voices of women like that, opened up a way of speaking about life that like was like, I already have this inner voice, but we can all say it out loud. It felt like it gave me permission.

I also, around the time I, you know was thirty, thirty-one, I knew at that point, we had been together for ten years and we had four kids. And I just immersed myself in a lot of self help because I realized, being from the faith tradition I was in, I had lived life in such a way where like God brings things to you and my idea of walking with God was just accepting things that came my way.

I realized at the age of 30, none of my life looks the way I would want it to. It doesn’t reflect any of my values. How did I get here? How do I undo this? How do I find a life I really want. And so I was just listening to a ton of self-help, which actually is male driven that space. Ten, fifteen years ago is very male driven. And so it always lacked quite a few key pieces, but it was really helpful for me to like set goals and start to have routines and take really good care of myself and I started having hobbies outside of the kids and outside of Josh.

And I started just finding my voice and my power and realizing how much that brought energy into my life and then feeling even stronger and more determined, even more determined not to settle for the marriage that it was at that time. So I think those were resources that really pushed me forward. and just really helped me find my voice, but also helped me just get a little stronger every day to trust that voice.

Rev. Ruth Perry (46:25)
Well, I guess we’ve run out of time for today. I feel like we could just keep talking and talking. There’s so many things I would love to talk with you about. But people can go back and watch your videos. Marriage is Happening. You’re pretty much on all the major social media platforms under Marriage is Happening. And make sure you follow them because they’re just constantly working on something and talking about it. And I’ve been able to benefit from your own healing work and I’m grateful and appreciative to you for being honest and putting your work out there and I’m grateful that you are here today. Thank you so much.

Jaime and Josh (46:58)
Thank you, Ruth. Thank you so much. Thank you for the beautiful conversation.


Did you enjoy this episode? Please subscribe, rate or review us on YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music, Substack, and more! Your support means the world. God bless!

032 I Dr. Bradley Jersak: Can Your Theology Heal You or Is It Hurting You?

A promotional image for The Beautiful Kingdom Builders Podcast featuring Dr. Bradley Jersak, a theologian and principal of St. Stephen's University. The image includes a logo, a photo of Dr. Jersak, and covers of his published books.
Dr. Bradley Jersak has written multiple extraordinary books that will guide you to a more beautiful faith. Buy them here.

When I asked Dr. Bradley Jersak on my podcast, I didn’t know I was going to open up about a recent experience where my religious trauma was triggered. Our conversation was then about the theological doctrines and systems that perpetuate hierarchies and harm, and the good news of a theology of God’s love and healing.

In this episode, Jersak shares his journey through various Christian traditions, his views on theology, trauma, and justice, and how love and mercy shape his understanding of faith. He shared why certain unchristlike interpretations can contribute to personal distress and how we might move toward a more beautiful, Christlike, and trauma-informed faith. By re-evaluating these frameworks, we can find a clearer path to spiritual wholeness that aligns with the nature of God rather than fear-based systems.

From his website: “Bradley Jersak is an author and teacher based in Abbotsford, BC. He currently serves as the Principal of St. Stephen’s University (SSU.ca) in New Brunswick, where he continues as the Dean and faculty member of SSU’s School of Theology & Culture. He also teaches peace studies courses with JFI.SSU.ca and is a regular Open Table Conference crew lecturer. He is also part of the Plain Truth Ministries team, where he serves as Pastoral Scholar. He writes, edits, and does layout for CWR magazine, CWR press, and the CWRm blog. Through his books and seminars, Brad shares the good news that God is Love, perfectly revealed in Jesus Christ, and that God’s love heals wounded hearts and empowers us to heal this broken world.”

Please enjoy this episode, where we talk about:
Bradley’s journey through Baptist, Mennonite, Renewal, and Orthodox traditions,
and now the new Episcopal Church plant he is a part of.
The impact of trauma and deconstruction on faith
A critique of penal substitutionary atonement and hellfire preaching
The biblical vision of justice, mercy, and the love of God
The systemic issues in church hierarchy and patriarchy
The importance of inclusive leadership and gender equality
The role of scripture reading and interpretation in systemic change
The eschatological hope of the restoration of all things

Please visit www.bradjersak.com where you can subscribe to his Substack and find his social media links and more, and buy one of his books here or at your favorite local bookstore (as an Amazon Affiliate, I do receive a small commission for purchases from my links).

You can find this episode of The Beautiful Kingdom Builders podcast on YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music, Substack, and more!

TRANSCRIPT:

Rev. Ruth Perry (00:16)
Today I’m pleased to welcome Brad Jersak, or I should say, Reverend Doctor. Are you a Reverend?

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (00:21)
Yeah, but let’s go with Bradley, because I’m trying to be a lay person now.

Rev. Ruth Perry (00:25)
Alright, so I’m gonna start over and I’m gonna say I’m welcoming Bradley Jersak. Or should I say doctor? I just feel like

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (00:29)
That’s perfect. No.

Rev. Ruth Perry (00:31)
I should give you all the

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (00:32)
I don’t need it anymore. I’m just Bradley.

Part part of my history was was healing from the way titles become identities and measures of hierarchy that I’m not interested in at all. But okay. I did do some hard work to get there. So thanks for putting doctor in there. I am the principal of a university and I’m a professor there now. So my students call me Bradley or dear friend.

Rev. Ruth Perry (00:56)
All right.

Well now I’m gonna leave all of this in the podcast because that was beautiful.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (01:01)
Perfect.

Rev. Ruth Perry (01:01)
So I’m pleased to welcome you and I’m really excited to talk about your work today with my audience and introduce them to you. I hope that they go down a Bradley Jersak rabbit hole like I did a few years ago and really soak in your theology because it’s been really healing to me and it’s really beautiful and it has the fragrance of the Spirit of God to me. And so I couldn’t tell you how excited I am that you accepted my invitation. And I’m really excited to introduce you to the Beautiful Kingdom Builders audience. Thank you for being here today.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (01:34)
Thanks for having me and it’s good to meet you.

Rev. Ruth Perry (01:36)
Can you take us back and tell us your story? Like just as an

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (01:39)
All right.

Rev. Ruth Perry (01:40)
introduction to who you are and where you started from and how you got to where you are today.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (01:44)
Sure, so that’s that’s a loaded question because I’m 62 now. This could take a moment. Distill, distill, distill. I grew up in a conservative Baptist family and church where I have loved Jesus since I learned his name on my mother’s lap. I have loved the scriptures since I first opened my Bible. And was able to read it on my own for the first time when I was six years old.

I have loved prayer since my mom taught me to pray for everyone in the family every night. And none of that has changed. I carry that part of my Baptist heritage very seriously. And I would even say conservative in this sense. My impulse is to conserve. And what do I want to conserve? The ancient faith of Jesus Christ. And sometimes that means backtracking to double check what that was in the for the first Christians.

So I grew up 22 years there, went off to an interdenominational, even more conservative, fundamentalist Bible college, where I met my wife Eden, and she was from a Mennonite family. And some think of the Mennonites like the old Mennonites look like Amish. Her church was more like a community church. And by the time I finished my master’s degree, I was hoping to be a teacher, but no doors were opening. And her church called me and said, Would you want to come and be associate pastor of youth, young adults and outreach? And I really didn’t want to, so I made it difficult on them to hire me. But the Lord opened that door and I just fell in love with the people I was working with.

And I also was immersed then and ordained in sort of that Anabaptist heritage of where we don’t just believe in Jesus, but we believe Jesus and his call to live according to the Sermon on the Mount. And that’s why Anabaptists or Mennonites are generally peace people, because they they take seriously the Jesus way of the Sermon on the Mount, especially of radical forgiveness and enemy love.

So I did that for 10 years, and I noticed how much more Mennonites tend to stay in the gospels, and that had an impact on me. By the time I left there, we were ready to plant a church. So my wife and I partnered up with Brian and Sue West, and we planted a little church called Fresh Wind. And our idea there was to be more open to Holy Spirit renewal stuff. So we were kind of open to that world. But the focus was actually on marginalized people.

And so imagine this: let’s say 150 people, one-third of them were people with disabilities in full-time care. Rows of wheelchairs, people with autism, people with Down syndrome on the stage in the worship team serving at the altar giving the communion and dedicating the babies, you name it. It and it was a glorious mess. And those folks began drawing addicts from the community, people with drug addiction, alcoholics and so on. And some of those were from unhoused people as well.

And they would come feeling like, this is like I’m at home and I’m safe here and I’m not the noisiest person in the room because someone’s having a grand mal seizure, you know. And so I co-led it for 10 years. So after 20 years total of pastoring, I had a massive meltdown in 2008, I really crashed. It wasn’t overwork, it was just trauma after trauma after trauma in that community. You know, within a year we had had someone abducted and abused for hours. We had someone else murdered with a hammer. we had had a whole bunch of people with disabilities that died tragically sometimes because their care was neglected.

I mean it just it built and then finally I had a meltdown. I didn’t know if I could trust God anymore. And I went in I went into my own addictive behaviors to cope with that. And I realized if I don’t trust God, we’re so vulnerable with all these traumas. I need to step back. That’s where my wife Eden stepped in and she led the church, brought them through a healing period, brought me through a healing period. And it was then I realized I can’t go back to pastoring.

And so I went off and I’m like, now I think I know the questions, especially around suffering. And did my PhD work around that stuff. And by the time I got finished that in 2012, I had an offer to start teaching. And so I teach Bible and theology now. I’m at St. Stephen’s University, where I’m I’m the principal of the graduate school of and I’m Dean of Theology and Culture there.

I’ve skipped some more church stuff though. So I had the Baptist era, the Mennonite era, and then this renewal kind of church for the marginalized era. None of that was just church hopping. I was all in doing, you know, serving in these churches, and I’ve collected all the gifts and treasures from those years, and I’ve not discarded any of them. I really appreciate it. But I also during you know, probably the 2000s, I came into contact with an old monk. He looks, he literally looks like Gandalf.

And in the Orthodox tradition, and so I’d visit his monastery and he began to show me how the Eastern Church, 350 million Christians in the world. How they approach the scriptures. And there was some things that were really in alignment with that sort of Mennonite version of the nonviolent God who’s revealed perfectly in Jesus. And some of your viewers I don’t know, I know you have, if you were to Google Jersak and Gospel in Chairs and Denver.

You’ll see a 30-minute presentation of what I learned from that monk, in fact. And I began attending there and the monastery would have weekend services, and it really became part of my recovery, where we heard the word mercy or merciful 154 times in two hours every Sunday as part of the liturgy. That’s what I needed. I needed a mercy bath.

More recently now I’m helping out with another church plant, an Episcopal Church that’s led by Ama, it’s like Mama, Cherith Fee Nordling. And so and what I love about that is I am an egalitarian at heart. I picked this up from the Mennonites, and that I believe women should be in every role that a man can be. And so I’ve really, really been spiritually thriving under female mentorship through the years. Which brings me to today. And here I am. Hello, Reverend Ruth.

Rev. Ruth Perry (07:42)
Hello. That’s such a beautiful story. And I really appreciate the appreciation you have for the different traditions you’ve experienced. Because

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (07:50)
yeah.

Rev. Ruth Perry (07:51)
I do think that, you know, we’re all expressing our revelation of God that we have and that we understand. And there’s a lot of beauty in all the different ways that people express that revelation of God.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (08:03)
Yeah. Think about the body of Christ not just as individuals, but as these movements. And who

Rev. Ruth Perry (08:08)
Yes.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (08:08)
are we to say we don’t need them, right? So I’m quite ecumenical that way, meaning I have learned to learn from those who have seen what I haven’t seen.

Rev. Ruth Perry (08:19)
Well, I appreciate that something I see in you, which is why I think your faith is beautiful, is that your spirit does show the fruit of the spirit love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, gentleness, self-control in ways that some of the spiritual authorities of my past don’t have those same fruit evident consistently. I mean I don’t know you consistently, but I get that from hearing your teachings and listening to your other podcast interviews you’ve been on. And I know I don’t know you, but I feel like I trust you and that your message has a lot of truth as my faith has grown, it does ring true to me. And I guess one of the things that I’m curious about

So this week in my context, I went to a local board meeting because we have some people in our community who want to revise our local library policies and procedures in a way that would create discrimination where we’re complying currently with non-discrimination laws and we’re receiving state funds because of that that would this would jeopardize. And there were a lot of people that came to the meeting to speak out and I came to speak out myself.

And I felt really triggered by the meeting because the chairperson who was really driving this effort reminded me so much of my upbringing in the conservative Baptist faith. And it was surprising to me how triggered I was by the meeting and by that experience and feeling really agitated and a lot of adrenaline pumping.

And something that I really appreciate about your book Out of the Embers is you talk so much about the trauma of deconstruction in a way that I haven’t heard other people speak of deconstruction and how painful the experience is. Can you speak to that just growing awareness of trauma and how it impacts us and to the experience of trauma in deconstruction.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (10:09)
Yeah. That’s a great question. So let’s start with your story. You used the word triggered and you realized the meeting was the trigger, the man chairing, I’m assuming it was a man chairing, was the trigger, but the trigger indicates a earlier trauma. And and that was related to pastoral authority in in a church you’d experience.

Well, the the bad news about that is you it makes your heart pound and probably gives you a headache, and and and so you have to become super self-aware. I don’t think the solution to triggers is getting rid of all the people who trigger us. That’s been a silly kind of move that folks have made, even those who are looking for safe space. It’s like I want spaces where no one will trigger me.

Well, what if we looked at that? What if we went back and said, what was going on back there that is coming up now that still needs healing work? And so that’s where I would start. I would also want to be super compassionate about that because having trauma triggered means that trauma’s lodged in you somewhere and you didn’t put it there. And that requires gentleness, it requires healing. You don’t get to just say, don’t be triggered, right? And we’re not gonna be able to wait until all of our triggers are gone and all of our traumas are healed in order to speak truth to power. So sometimes that’s very uncomfortable and it it’s costly to you and your nervous system. And and so I honor you for stepping up anyway.

Further, it doesn’t justify the one triggering you either. You are identifying a pattern that needs addressing. So that’s a lot on the table, isn’t it? But if we could boil it down, to say yes, continue speaking for justice and goodness and mercy. Keep speaking in ways that resist, let’s say racism or sexism or homophobia or whatever, any kind of belittling or othering of those who aren’t like us. And while you do that, you’re noting how it’s impacting you. And I would attend to it.

And so that’s what I do. I mean I my nervous system was really damaged in two thousand eight. As far as I’m aware, it’s not fully recovered and I no longer expect that. So it just means I need a healing team around me. So I attend 12-step meetings for that. I see a spiritual director for that. I ad hoc will see a counselor for that, have it for a while. But I really firmly believe that doing that inner work, I can’t do it by myself. And it’s not about sucking it up.

I am nervous when self-care becomes our highest value. It makes us unhireable, actually. We have generations we may lose over that one. But we do self-care and we do it so that we’re more effective and that the impact on your religious PTSD, which by the way is a real thing. One of our master’s students just did her her thesis on that. And that religious PTSD.

Well, since you mentioned trauma, what she identified was the similarities between religious PTSD that comes from being raised with a retributive God, a punisher god, how similar the fruit is in that to women in recovery houses from domestic violence. And she said, based on the correlation of the bad fruit, she goes, I don’t need a a biblical or theological debate to demonstrate these doctrines are wrong. Because Jesus said, look at the fruit. And as the fruit of a doctrine looks like victimization by domestic violence, then we’ve got to push back. So that’s a lot, but it’s about you, you know, in terms of trauma. Does that kind of ring true or how how’s that landing for you?

Rev. Ruth Perry (13:45)
Yeah, absolutely. I have done some therapy and some EMDR therapy for religious trauma. It wasn’t something I was really aware that I had religious trauma until I had a similar kind of breakdown when I was 40. I’m 46 now.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (14:01)
Mm-hmm.

Rev. Ruth Perry (14:02)
And my daughter watched the video of the meeting at the library and she told me, You were so nice to that man. I wish you hadn’t been so nice. And I could feel myself fawning, like having a traumatic response where I did, I fawned.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (14:15)
Wow.

Rev. Ruth Perry (14:15)
I said it, I gave him a compliment before I made my peace.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (14:18)
Yeah.

Rev. Ruth Perry (14:19)
And I wish I had said things more strongly. So it was kind of a jarring experience. We’re looking back where I feel like I’ve done a lot of healing work, but I guess I’m not there yet.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (14:28)
That’s profound though, cause to distinguish Christ-like mercy from fawning when they can look alike, right? Look at the fruit of the Spirit you exhibited. And you know what? Maybe you did. But the shadow side of that is a traumatic fawning response. That’s quite a insight. I’m glad that you noticed, you know.

Rev. Ruth Perry (14:48)
Yeah, I didn’t mean to bring it up today, but I just feel like I’m in good hands. And so thank you for listening to that and giving some advice.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (14:55)
Yeah, for sure.

Rev. Ruth Perry (14:57)
So what are the things about religious fundamentalism that do cause religious trauma?

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (15:02)
Okay, so I think some of it is doctrinal and some of it is around practice and and structures, systems, right? What do you want to cover first?

Rev. Ruth Perry (15:12)
Anything. Everything.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (15:13)
Okay. So it could be a chicken and egg thing anyway, but I do think they correlate, as the great band ACDC once asked, who made who? So is it a nurture or nature thing and is it a doctrine or practice thing? And what I mean by that is sometimes we will generate God in our own image. And if that image arises from a culture that is punitive, that is exclusive, you just begin building in that image of God, and it’s absolutely an idol. Or, if you have a God you believe is retributive, the punisher God, the one who needs his wrath satisfied, all of that stuff, then that God will then have a trickle-down effect, you begin to emulate that God, and it’s a feedback loop.

I generate this violent God, this violent God shapes me. And so I’ll start with doctrine then. In the order I discovered things. First I began to question whether the cross was about satisfying God’s wrath through the punishment of his son. We called that penal substitutionary atonement. Penal as in punishment. Substitute is God has to punish somebody. He actually is not free to forgive. And he can either punish you or he can punish Jesus. Take your pick.

And so Jesus takes your punishment. And I defended that. I grew up with that. We call that an atonement theory now. I thought it was the gospel. And I did my Master of Arts thesis, a hundred and eighty page defense of that doctrine. So I promise you I’m not just making a caricature. But it’s about this satisfaction of wrath through violence. And it doesn’t take too much figuring out to see how that turns into retribution in our penal system. So instead of being a justice system, you end up with a penal system where wrath is satisfied through punishment.

But not just our penal system. It ends up in how we treat people, how we treat the other, even how we treat our children. I can’t just forgive. That’s not good parenting. I have to punish. And what we find out is how often that that is connected in both spousal cases and parental cases, that there is an abuse that happens because there’s anger attached to it. And they’re going, of course there is. It’s the wrath of God.

So that penal substitutionary atonement, people need to know that is not the only way to see the cross. In fact, that way is 500 years old. I’m a conservative. I want to conserve the gospel that we see in, let’s say, the book of Acts, where that never ever comes up once in any evangelistic sermon to Jews or Gentiles, individuals or groups. Never.

What is it about? The cross is a revelation that God is radically forgiving, self-giving, co-suffering love, and that He has poured that out into this world in a way that overcomes Satan’s sin and death. It is the love of God revealed on the cross, not his wrath. In fact, on the cross, God makes a specific no to wrath and yes to forgiveness.

So I start with the cross, and then that begins to trickle out. If God doesn’t have to punish, if God is free to forgive, based on the work of Christ, not in my faith, but by the grace of God, then we should double check this doctrine of eternal conscious torment. The idea of what I call infernalism, it’s about that hell is the never ending punishment of the sinners who didn’t say the right prayer because they didn’t grow up in the right community.

Something’s off about that. And what we found out is even in the evangelical world now, that’s not the only way to see it because we double checked the Bible. I wrote a book about it called Her Gates Will Never Be Shut. And yes, there’s judgment. Yes, we need a willing faith to response, but it’s restorative judgment, it’s restorative justice. So Jesus says, if I’m lifted up, and then John clarifies he was talking about the cross. I will draw all people to myself.

I think he’s right. I don’t believe Jesus was mistaken or lying, and he gives us as that as a promise. Well, then where does judgment fit in? It’s the means to that end, cleansing judgment. I wish I had heard less hellfire preaching and more soap preaching. But Malachi says he will come with a refiner’s fire that purifies the gold. And with launderer’s soap, which washes out the stains, right?

So, that’s where I went from there. Because a lot of the revivalists who traumatized me as a little boy, they held a smoking gun to our heads called hell and said, unless you pray this prayer, you’re going to hell forever. So I’d pray the prayer. Does that sound like a willing faith response, or is that a hostage situation, right?

And then the third one was then we began to look at the Old Testament texts and seeing all the even the call to genocide without mercy, which we have now somehow employed at times, the book of Joshua, book of Judges, First Samuel, and said, See, we can go and kill others in the name of God, our crusades, our crusades against the Muslim nations. They’re the enemy and we’re God’s servants and He’s on our side, all of that.

And Jesus comes along and he says, You’ve heard it said, but I’m telling you. And for me, then Jesus gets the final word. And he teaches us that the Old Testament was pointing to him. And when it points to him, he comes along and he says, I’m telling you. You don’t retaliate. You love your enemies. You pray for your enemies. You bless your enemies. You forgive your enemies, even if they crucify you.

And then he lives by what he says. So those are all doctrinal elements that I think have created horrendous religious trauma. And yet these other the major movements in the body of Christ have already seen that. So we don’t have to believe any of that stuff as if we’re being unfaithful.

I want to talk to structures and systems, but I want to pause first, see if you have any questions or comments about the doctrine.

Rev. Ruth Perry (21:04)
I was thinking about when I was growing up and praying for my grandparents who are United Methodists and now I’m serving in a United Methodist denomination. But I used to pray for their salvation ’cause I was so afraid that they were going to hell because they weren’t Baptists like me.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (21:15)
Yeah. Yeah. Been there. And all you, you as a little child, you’re looking at all these people who are going to hell and you know it and you love them and you wonder, doesn’t God love them? Yes, God loves them and He doesn’t want them to go to hell. So you have to convince them or they will. And if you don’t, their blood’s on your hands. I mean it was it was pretty rank. And yeah, that’ll traumatize you.

Rev. Ruth Perry (21:38)
With religious fundamentalism there’s so much emphasis on, you know, don’t spare the rod or you’ll spoil the child and even like don’t hold your crying baby because you’ll spoil your baby and there’s so much of that the baby’s trying to manipulate you and I do see

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (21:52)
Good Lord.

Rev. Ruth Perry (21:52)
so much trauma from kids who have grown up with religious parents who I believe were well meaning and they were misled through authorities who had really tragic beliefs.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (22:04)
Yeah. That is connected to doctrine as well. So in the Latin, there’s a Latin doctrine of original sin says that every baby is born inheriting the guilt of Adam, and therefore they’re born damned. And so you gotta make sure they get saved quickly, right? And that doctrine only began in about four hundred AD.

Up until then, they’re like, no, we’re all gifts from God. We bear his image. And yes, we’re thrown into a situation where stumbling will be inevitable. But because it’s inevitable and we’re moral toddlers bound to trip, God’s only just response is mercy, and that’s exactly what he gives us. But if you believe that every child is born damned, well, that’s terrifying. We did have a age of accountability thing. Well, they kinda God gives them a you know

Rev. Ruth Perry (22:50)
Little wiggle room there.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (22:51)
A little, a little wiggle room. Back in our day, it’s like the first time they’re defiant. Okay, now so they’re two. now with Gen Z, you gotta make the age of accountability about 30, but that’s a joke.

Rev. Ruth Perry (23:03)
Can you explain more about justice and holiness in regards to God doctrinally then, if God is not punitive when we’re not just or holy?

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (23:14)
Yeah, very good. So we’ll hear that a lot, right? God is love, but he’s also holy. God is love, but he’s also just. God is love, but he’s also righteous. God is love, but but but. And we have to have a but removal surgery here. Here’s the nature of God according to First John. God is love. So think about nature, and I will say essence.

So essence would be who God is from all eternity, and that can’t change. That’s the core of who God is. That’s God’s essence. And then is God’s nature is then, in terms of good-natured person, right? Nature is how we interact, how we come into the world, how we’re experienced. So God’s essence and nature is love. Period. No, no buts. Think of that like let’s say a diamond.

And there’s no impurities in that diamond. That’s all the way down. So now if you take righteousness, justice, and holiness as something other than, but right, as over against love, well, the righteousness and holiness and justice that is not God’s love, that is not God’s nature, that’s the Pharisees who killed Jesus. That’s the fundamentalists who string up Black people in the lynching trees.

So then what is it? Well, so the righteousness, justice, and holiness of God are facets of that love, and that limits what they can look like. There can only be just love, righteous love, holy love. And if the nature of love is to restore, then restorative justice and a kind of holiness that Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount, both Matthew and Luke, he actually says that be holy or be perfect as the Heavenly Father is perfect, and then he describes it: invite everybody to the banquet. He because he is he is generous and kind to the righteous and to the wicked. So that’s holiness. We turned holiness, that is not love, into exclusion, the very opposite of Jesus’ own definition.

So I don’t have any problem with holiness, righteousness, and justice as long as they are always, ever, only facets of his divine nature. And that’s pretty simple from the scriptures. I can give you, I tell you, because I know Calvinism really well. I wore it for a while. The pushback on that is here’s what they do with it. They’re like, and I’ve heard Baptists say, God is not love. I’m like, okay, what? They’re like, God is only love to the elect.

I won’t even argue with that. The theological term for that is cuckoo. I know I’m enough of a biblicist to know when we’re violating scripture to say something like that. That is twisting scripture to fit some system that is a reflection of our own exclusion and prejudice. And it’s demonic, frankly. So whoo, I said that. But yeah.

Rev. Ruth Perry (25:56)
Yeah. Well, my experience growing up with that Calvinist worldview was that I was elect and I was in, I was a golden child of my church, of my family.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (26:04)
Mm. Yep. Yep.

Rev. Ruth Perry (26:06)
And I received so much affirmation and love and support. But then when I hit that wall of deconstruction because of a church split and my family having issues going on and I was just really overwhelmed, that perfect image of my faith and my family was crumbling. I watched some Brennan Manning videos and I realized he was teaching that God loves me unconditionally.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (26:29)
Wow, hey.

Rev. Ruth Perry (26:30)
And that was a brand new concept. I had never felt unconditionally loved. I had been striving and fearful and felt like I was a sinner in the hand of an angry God.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (26:38)
Yeah.

Rev. Ruth Perry (26:39)
And it was such a tenuous situation for even someone who was just really killing it being a Christian.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (26:44)
Yeah. Isn’t that interesting too that here this was our big critique as Protestants of the Catholics, that they believed in salvation by works. But here you were dying of striving, and then a Catholic comes along, Brennan,

Rev. Ruth Perry (26:59)
Yes.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (26:59)
and says his love is unconditional. What a, how the, how that boat flipped over, I don’t know, but we’re grateful for his life in ministry and he really demonstrated that even a very broken man with his own addictions had come to the end of himself and he knew it’s the grace of God even in my relapses or it’s nothing at all. And now that’s a grace message, right?

Rev. Ruth Perry (27:21)
Yeah.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (27:21)
We should talk about systems a little bit ’cause that’s the other side of your trauma and it’s coming up now.

Rev. Ruth Perry (27:24)
Yeah, that would be helpful.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (27:26)
So what are some of the ways that religious systems perpetuate trauma? So there’s a kind of reading of scripture that is not like the early church read the Bible. I’ve written a I’ve written a book called A More Christlike Word, the Emmaus Way of Reading Scripture, where Jesus tells us how to read scripture, and the early church has left us documents that I share in my book, about here’s how you read the Bible.

We went into a weird kind of literalism, probably as a result of modernism, where we thought we could just have rules of interpretation where we’ll be certain what it means. And those are often very unchristlike and wooden literalism. That kind of way of reading scripture s seems then to generate hierarchies. So a hierarchy of who’s important, who’s unimportant, who can lead, who can’t lead. Who’s in and who’s out, and so those literalistic readings have created systems of well, first of all, domination style leadership that is a reflection of empire.

So domination taking over, and that can happen by when a pastor thinks they’re the king of the church, or even like if a power group gets control of the votes, right? But it’s about domination then. And that is the opposite of Philippians 2, where he says, have this mind in you that it was in Christ Jesus, that even though he, or even because he was equal with God, he didn’t think that equality with God was a thing you grasp and cling to but he humbled himself. He emptied himself.

Well that’s not hierarchy, that’s kenarchy, we call it. So kenarchy is the word there for emptied himself, kenosis. So it is servant leadership, basically, by laying your life down and washing the feet of your disciples. So the whole domination thing, it’s like, you know what? If that’s going on, probably you should flee that system because it will put its boot on your throat at some point.

Specific then to that, hierarchy tends to default into patriarchy, and that is male-only leadership through horrendous literalistic interpretations and translations of obscure scriptures compared to the very clear gospel texts that should be at the center in Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, male nor female, slave nor free, all of that. But anytime you have a hierarchy, so you will find a way to put women lower, you will find a way to put children lower, you will find a way to put the poor lower, you will find a way to put other races lower, the immigrant lower, everything but and of course who’s on the top? I am. I’m a straightish white guy. I say straightish because you know I’m very straight, but kind of have a crush on Brad Pitt, okay?

Rev. Ruth Perry (30:10)
Ha ha

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (30:11)
That was a joke. Okay, so anyway. But the like, so the straight white guys get the power and they hang on to it. And I just don’t believe in that. And so part of the reason that I’m part of this Episcopal Church plant, I’ve not left the Orthodox Church, but I don’t believe in all male leadership. I don’t believe in patriarchy. I don’t believe in hierarchy. That’s not the Jesus way. And so I’m very pleased that my priest is Cherith Fee Nordling, a wonderful woman mentor. And I’m very pleased that when she serves the Eucharist, even she says, We are here to express the radical hospitality of Jesus to his table, where everyone, without exception, is welcome. I mean, it’s a gospel moment, right?

And so, it would be sort of like, but what if they’re not Christians? Well, we’re serving his body and blood. If they want and need the body and blood of Christ, I guess that’s how some of them become Christians. So I do remember back in the day we had this Satanist guy, Ken. This Satanist started coming to our church Fresh Wind, right? And one day he shows up at the communion table and the people serving communion run over to me. It’s like, the Satanist wants communion.

And so I said, Say this to him. This is his body for your healing. Do you need it? Yes. This is his blood that washes away your sins, shame, and guilt. Do you need it? Yes. And then Ken received the healing, the cleansing, the forgiveness that is present in the Eucharist. And my goodness, we’d be in trouble with so many people. So then Ken became a Christian Satanist, I guess. And at the next Easter service, he was on our stage performing a rap that sounded like a prophetic utterance, right?

And yeah, it was risky, but my point is there’s this kind of that’s the kind of leveling of the playing field out of the hierarchy, even of the elect and non-elect, or Jesus saying in the Sermon on the Mount. Not everyone who says Lord Lord is in fellowship with me. So let’s be a little slow on our claims here. But those who do the will of my father. And that’s not about performing.

It’s just like someone calling themselves a Christian means almost nothing to me now. That brand is tainted. I want to see who’s following Jesus, you know, and not by performance, but by the fruit in their lives. All of that then undermines those systems of power and exclusion. Does that make sense?

Rev. Ruth Perry (32:41)
Yeah, I’m kind of curious what you would say about Genesis when God gave dominion. How do you explain what dominion looks like? Because I know some think that that means we have authority to conquer and conquest.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (32:54)
Geez, How we got from dominion to conquest is quite a leap, isn’t it?

Rev. Ruth Perry (32:59)
Yeah.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (32:59)
But I do really see it as stewardship. So dominion is being a gardener, after the pattern of the gardener. And what I love about it is in John, when John’s talking about Jesus’ arrest, he’s playing with that. He’s like starts the story: there was a garden. You’re like, yeah, there was a garden, wasn’t there? And then in a little while Jesus comes to Mary Magdalene and she thinks he’s a gardener. And I say she’s not mistaken.

And what does a gardener do, right? I’ve got some garlic and and some lavender that and some echinacea I planted outside. Whatever I’m doing to try to keep those flourishing and fruitful, doesn’t look like conquest. it looks like nurturing, it looks like watering, it looks it, it looks like tilling and all of the good things. So I I think, but you can see how that imperial mindset invades a scripture like that and then we end up dumping toxic waste into Lake Ontario

Rev. Ruth Perry (33:56)
Yes!

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (33:57)
and because the Lord’s gonna return in twenty years anyway. I mean it’s so awful. And then just one other thing then that reminds me then also we do have a dominant version of evangelical end times preaching that is looking to bring back Jesus by causing Armageddon. And we need to repent. Blessed are the peacemakers, they will be called children of God.

Well, guess what we did? We actually named handguns and missiles peacemakers. We stole that word from Jesus and turned it into destruction. I can’t think of many worse blasphemies. But we know what he means: that James tells us those who sow in peace will reap a harvest of justice or righteousness. You don’t sow violence to get peace. You sow peace to get justice. And that’s the Jesus way that I’m very interested in, but it seems now to be a minority report.

Troubling.

I do want to share a there I saw I have a friend, he’s a church growth and health consultant and he does a survey wherever he goes. Liberal churches, progressive churches, conservative churches, fundamentalist churches. He goes to all of them, right? And he goes to these things on weekends. So it’s not sort of your Sunday church goers or marginal attendees. It’s like people really invested in helping the church grow and be healthy.

So we’re talking about active members. He presents the Sermon on the Mount, the section on love your enemies, bless your enemies, pray for your enemies, invite everybody to your table. He presents that paragraph, and in his survey, 74%, and we’re talking thousands of people have done the poll. 74% considered that paragraph, if they were conservatives, as a compromise with unrighteousness. 72% of progressives. So even on the left, 72% complicity with injustice. So right and left, almost three-quarters of those who claim to be Christians reject the very words of Jesus when they’re presented like that.

But I believe Christ is bringing us all along, but I do wanna say it feels like following Jesus in what he actually said and called us to is a minority report and always has been. So I’m not too worried about that. It’s not we’re not having a vote if Jesus was right or not. But I do wanna be faithful and that’s kind of where I go back to to test it.

Rev. Ruth Perry (36:18)
So can you tell us what your end time view is?

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (36:22)
I used to know everything. You need to know this. I was 21 at the time, and I had all the graphs charted out. Probably the third or fourth time we got the dates wrong, I gave that up. And in moving toward a more Eastern theology, and I would say scripture focused, how can I summarize?

Well, first of all, the Nicene Creed, I’m a creedal Christian. That means, you know, all Catholics, all Orthodox, Anglican, and so on. Those who aren’t making up their own faith statement would cite the Nicene Creed. Here’s what it says about the end, and then I’ll tell you two opinions I’d have. So this would be dogma. He will come again with glory to judge the living and the dead. And we look forward to the resurrection of the dead and the life of the age to come. Period. Amen. Period. That’s it. That’s the whole thing.

And as I said before, that judgment will be restorative. But they didn’t put that in there because they also said, you know, if you don’t believe that, you could still affirm this. They were quite inclusive that way. I think messing with that dogma, adding stuff that you have to believe, is probably a formal heresy. ‘Cause we’ve got the dogma, you don’t toy with that.

That said, two things I see in the New Testament. One is if you want a picture of the end times, of the end, you look at the Mount of Transfiguration. That’s it right there. Christ transfigured, and you can already see Moses and Elijah are able to stand in the light and glory of his transfiguration. The disciples can’t yet, but I believe that the end game is the transfiguration of all things and all people.

That leads me to my other text. In Acts 3, Peter’s preaching about heaven is holding Jesus until. The restoration of all things and all people. I mean it just says the restoration of all. And he’s talking specifically of people, but I think it’s the whole cosmos. So if it’s the transfiguration and the restoration of all, I don’t know how we get there. So I won’t pretend I do. But it’s a glorious vision, and it’s a vision that I can sew into now.

So if I think that the end game is the restoration of all things, because that’s what he says, if I think that Jesus was right when he says he’ll draw all people to himself, how will I live today? I will treat everybody as somebody on that path. And I will sew whatever I can that will nourish their restoration. That’s why I’m a big fan of 12-step recovery, for example. They’ve done much more good, probably, than any other religious movement in the world in terms of seeing the power of restoration through surrender to the care of a loving God. Sign me up. And so I did. I’ve been hanging out with them since two thousand eight.

And even before actually a little bit, but I just feel like they’re on to something there. That God is a loving, caring, forgiving, healing, responsive, relational God, and what they don’t insist on is that you figure it out right away that that was revealed in Jesus. But I do, and I’m allowed to say that there. I think he revealed this in Jesus. So yeah. So there, there you’ve got my eschatology in a minute. It would it used to take hours.

Rev. Ruth Perry (39:28)
Well, that’s just a sign that you’ve done a lot of work.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (39:31)
Distill and no less. Yeah.

Rev. Ruth Perry (39:33)
I’m going to ask you one more selfish question because I’m a local church pastor and in the lectionary, the gospel passage this week is the parable of the vineyard laborers who started at different times of the day.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (39:45)
Yeah.

Rev. Ruth Perry (39:46)
And so I’ve been contemplating on that this week. And then just this morning, I saw a reflection of someone talking about reading that text through the lens of the five o’clock labors and comparing them to our Latino immigrants in America that we’re currently, you know, putting in for-profit detention centers and holding without due process and ripping families apart and sending people back to countries that they were never in before and back to violence and danger and the way we’re treating our Latino neighbors, by the vote of Christians largely, that these policies are in place.

And so today I’ve been reflecting on how do I, as a local church pastor who wants to preach the word of God as good news, also talk about justice for my Christian Latino, I mean not even just Christian, but I think we forget that we’re talking about largely Christian siblings in the faith and we’re allowing this to happen to them

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (40:42)
Yeah.

Rev. Ruth Perry (40:43)
in a context of a conservative culture that probably voted for it too.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (40:48)
Yeah.

Rev. Ruth Perry (40:48)
What is your pastor to pastor advice?

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (40:51)
I would just say what you just said. That’s amazing. I love that. Preach. You know, and you can always get food stamps next week.

Rev. Ruth Perry (40:59)
Yeah.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (41:00)
But, I will so first of all, I could not agree more strongly with everything you just said. So let’s start there. What I think you’re uncovering there is that a parable about unconditional grace actually brings about the justice we’re looking for, right? Because the complainers are the ones who are saying it’s an injustice. What’s the injustice? And he’s like, are you going to complain to me? This is my money here. I can pay whoever I want whatever I want. And if I give them the same at the end of the day as I gave you for that’s my call, not yours.

And so they’re complaining this isn’t fair. And maybe the way he’s coming at that complaint is that this is grace. Do you want to live by grace or do you want to live by fair? Because we could do that, couldn’t we? Are you sure you want to do that? Because if you’re sure you want to do that, then we’re going to talk about complicity and we’re going to talk about privilege and we’re going to talk about reparations and we’re going to talk. That’s what you so I don’t know. I think I would go with the grace. And so you’re just causing these thoughts in me now to sow the scandalous the scandalous grace that I would even call Indiscriminate.

Doesn’t feel fair. But it’s the only way you get to justice. And if instead you withhold to get to justice, so it will be done to you. The measure with which you judge, you will be judged. So you don’t get to live in the land of grace and keep someone else in the land of the law. That’s not how it works. But if you want to, it’s not even a threat from God. It’s just a natural spiritual law

You will be judged, even in this life by other people. Never mind God. Right? So that’s kind of some first thoughts I have about it. I’ll probably have to go do some journaling now because of you, thank you. Yeah, it’s a grace message that brings about justice. Hmm. Indiscriminate. That’s so scandalous. How could he? Glad he did. Glad he did.

Rev. Ruth Perry (42:58)
Amen.

Well, thank you so much for coming on my little podcast and being such a blessing to me and to my audience, I hope. And I’m gonna put lots of links in the show notes to send people to watch some of my favorite teachings you’ve done. And I wanna give you the last word. What would you want to say as the final message?

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (43:18)
Well, I do wanna give a invitation. Part of my deal is if people go to SSU.ca, there may be folks who would like to learn more. You could come study with me online or in person and we talk about the intersection of theology and culture and how we can transcend the r right left culture wars without exiting the world, still engaging with the work of justice. And we have peace and justice degrees, we have reconciliation studies degrees, and now we have a transformative leadership degree with a lot of voices from the global south helping us decolonize our theology. So if people want to look at su.ca, CA is for Canada, but we’re an international school with the travel modules to South Africa. Check in there. So that’s my pitch.

But my last message maybe for today would be like, mercy triumphs over judgment.

Rev. Ruth Perry (44:11)
Amen. Thank you so much, Bradley.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (44:13)
Welcome,

Rev. Ruth Perry (44:13)
God bless.

Dr. Bradley Jersak – SSU.ca (44:14)
You too.


Did you enjoy this episode? Please subscribe, rate or review us on YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music, Substack, and more! Your support means the world. God bless!