Tag Archives: narcissism

020 I Becky Garrison on Gaslighting for God: Recognizing Spiritual Narcissists and Cultures

Find all of Becky Garrison’s books on Amazon at this link.

I had a lot of fun and a lot of “A ha!” moments reading religious satirist Becky Garrison’s ninth book, Gaslighting for God: A Satirical Guide to Save Yourself from Spiritual Narcissists. Garrison formerly wrote for The Whittenburg Door, a Christian satire magazine. Her social commentary is so insightful. In our conversation, Garrison discusses the intersections of narcissism, gaslighting, and spiritual abuse within religious communities and broader culture. She shares personal experiences, critiques of religious and political figures, and offers guidance on recognizing and resisting narcissistic dynamics. This is a very timely resource and is well-researched and comes from deep expertise.

Key topics in this episode:
Narcissism and spiritual abuse in religious communities
The role of humor and satire in exposing narcissistic dynamics
Personal experiences with narcissistic family and church systems
Connections between political figures like Trump and broader cultural narcissism
Strategies for recognizing and resisting narcissistic manipulation

Here are links for you to follow Garrison’s work:
Buy Gaslighting for God
Becky Garrison Website
Becky Garrison on Substack
YouTube Channel of Becky Garrison

Please enjoy this episode of The Beautiful Kingdom Builders podcast on YouTubeSpotifyApple PodcastsAmazon MusicSubstack, and more

TRANSCRIPT:

Ruth Perry (00:15)
My guest today is author, journalist, and religious satirist, Becky Garrison, whose most recent book is titled, Gaslighting for God, a satirical guide to saving yourself from spiritual narcissists. Thank you so much for being here today, Becky.

Becky (00:26)
Thank you for having me, much appreciated.

Ruth Perry (00:32)
I just finished your book yesterday and I was really amazed by it. It was really powerful. It wasn’t what I was expecting in some ways and then it was so more deep and insightful than I was expecting in other ways. And so I highly God anyone who wants to learn more about gaslighting and narcissism and how this intersects with the Christian church in America. It’s really fantastic.

But as I was reading your book, one of the thoughts that I kept having was, have producers or writers of the show, Righteous Gemstones, reached out to you, Becky? I think you’d be a great writer!

Becky (01:05)
No, they have not and in fact, I mean that show my only quibble with that show is that in real life Prosperity Gospels would never swear in public. We use words like sugar instead of other words. So that that was my only quibble and I don’t think they would have been quite as sexually up But that’s the Danny McBride did. He likes to have men walking around doing things and he did that but other than that he really captured I think the essence of someone even Eli and even his wife, they were still so caught up in their own narcissism that even the sweet, precious, matriarch, she was still narcissistic as all get out. It was more overt versus covert. But there was clearly an evidence that they never really cared about their congregation. They cared about the numbers and the pews and that’s what I think the ultimate definition of a narcissist versus someone who’s self-absorbed. I mean, we all like attention.

You know to be it’s nice to be recognized. It’s nice to get validated. And sometimes when you have a book coming out or another project and you can get full of your own But you can get a little too full of yourself, but then someone can call you out and say hey, wait a minute knock it off. That could not happen with the Righteous Gemstones. They lack empathy. They lack compassion. They had no self-awareness whatsoever of how their actions were impacting others. There’s also a grandiose sense of self. I am better than you. I am a better human being than you. I am smarter than you. If it’s one of those mean girl things, I look better than you. Whatever it is, I am better than other people. Not just I’m for myself, but I’m full of myself a little bit on times.

Ruth Perry (02:36)
I did appreciate towards the end of your book, you did talk about how it is important for us to take some pride in our work and to enjoy the process of creating things and putting things out there and creating community. And because in the back of my mind, I always have this little niggling thing, like I don’t want to be narcissistic, And sometimes,

Like now starting this podcast, I feel really passionate about putting alternative narratives about Christianity out there rather than the toxic forms that are so pervasive. But I don’t want to be narcissistic. And so I really did appreciate that at the end of your book, how you talked about how taking some pride in your work and like enjoying that process is good.

Becky (03:09)
Mmm. Typically, if you’re asking yourself, am I narcissistic? Odds are you’re not. The kind of celebrity who humblebrags, we’re all a little narcissistic or, I just might be narcissistic about that. Yeah, that person’s a flaming narcissist trying to deflect. But a lot of us, it is something that you struggle with. And I think it’s a legitimate struggle. How do you have an open conversation and admitting your humanity? You might look at your podcast when we can go, damn, someone’s doing better than me.

That’s normal, that’s okay to do. It’s acknowledging, it’s an inability, not there’s another human being on the other end and that person matters and they don’t matter as someone who can give you volunteer hours, who can give you their money, who can give you whatever you need from them, the affirmation, the accolades, et cetera, et cetera. But we all have that it’s important. It’s called either high self-esteem healthy narcissism. That’s what gets me to keep going up and keep going. I believe in what I’m doing. I believe in my work. I believe in it passionately and I will defend it and that might maybe come off as a bit of an a-hole. But that’s the difference between that and a narcissist.

Like if someone’s being kind of rude to me and kind of a jerk and I’m a little bit rude back, that might be justified in my behavior. I’m still going to feel a little something. I hurt someone’s feelings. I feel bad and I should feel a little bad because I hurt someone’s feelings. And what am I going to do to make that better? So I can become more regulated so I don’t snap at someone.

Ruth Perry (04:45)
How do you employing humor impactful when you’re having difficult conversations like this?

Becky (04:52)
Well, there’s role of the satirist, if you think of it. He functions as the court jestor. We keep the king honest. I’m thinking, one of my childhood influences was Monty Python. I was a prenatal Episcopalian. My late father was an Episcopal priest and a sociology professor. Do the math, do the ecclesiology. Yep, I was prenatal Episcopalian.

And so the way in which they lampoon the lunacies, you all can laugh at something collectively. And once you can laugh at something and say, my God, this is absolutely ridiculous. It helps break the energy down. And it really gives us a chance to see, because the point of a satirist is if we can break the idol, smash the idol, you can then see the glimpses of God or goodness underneath, but you first must smash the idol. And we’re in a period right now of a lot of idol smashing and that’s where you’re getting a lot of the pushback is that from the most extreme fundamentalist to the most enlightened guru, everyone has their idol and they love it. I mean, the people would love it. The Wittenberg Door, the progressives. I say this in the book when I would satirize a televangelist, all of a sudden we would satirize Jim Wallace, Tony Campallo, Brian McLaren, the whole emergent church gang. And all of a sudden you would have thought that we committed Harry Carrey on.

You know, it was like, and that’s why I did not understand that versus someone like Jerry Jenkins. So I mentioned the book. We satirized him. How can you not satirize the Left Behind series? You have to do that. It is ripe. I we had the plumbers edition, the Cleft Behind, everything. And he wrote us back and said, Hey, this is funny. I’m open for an interview if you’re up for it. And I did it. And we do not agree on probably anything theologically.

Or very few things we would agree on. But we had one the most pleasant conversations because he was a decent human being. You know, he was not a narcissist. He was kind, he was generous. And we had a very pleasant interview. Other people that I’ve agreed with on almost everything, theologically, and then all of a sudden I’ll just critique them and you would have thought that I did something horrible to them. They just go absolutely like Tasmanian Devil Ballistic.

Until the research in the narcissism. I had no clue what was going on. And now I can watch the news I can watch certain progressive pastors and their conservative counterparts and go yep. That’s a narcissistic meltdown. Okay, I don’t have to take that person seriously because you cannot have a dialogue with a narcissist. You can enjoy their entertainment If there’s no abuse involved, I want to make that clear if there’s abuse you should not be supporting this. But if the person is just a full-blown narcissist and you happen to like their music, you like their performance, go see it. It’s enjoyable. Just don’t expect anything beyond the evening’s fun. I think that’s where especially Christians, we’re looking for a form of a community. You cannot have that with a narcissist. And that’s what you have to give up is the hope that you’ll ever have a community with this person.

Ruth Perry (07:40)
So you have developed a very finely tuned narcissism detector, it seems. And then you also say in your book that coupled with that, you have an intense desire to speak truth to pastoral power. So before we dive into the content of your book, I was curious if you would share what is your personal background and experiences that have shaped you in that way.

Becky (07:45)
Okay. I was born to a hippie father from a very old, genteel southern family. He was the black sheep, to put it kindly, who was, I later discovered in my teens was an alcoholic. I’ve now since realized he was also a narcissist. And I realized that the majority of my extended family were narcissists. He married an enabling earth mother type, both of them died from their addictions in the 1970s. And at that time, the research was not there for alcoholism. So there was a lot of blame, a lot of shame. These were the bad people. And the family was displacing them. And I was also the family white elephant spotter, so to speak, in that I would say, why is so-and-so drunk? Why is this happening? I’m seeing something. And I would continuously be told, you’re making that up. That isn’t true. No, you’re not.

So I now have through the research learned that often the oldest child is the one scapegoat, because they’re the ones who can see the truth. My younger brother was the golden child. My younger sister was the golden beauty and I was the loser dreamer. So I was scape. So this dynamic came from my childhood, but yet my father in his research, I mentioned this in the book, he was studying how to reach those on the fringes. He was researching why were some kids joining SDS and others joining JAPUZA. What was it that was attracting these kids to these radical movements? Neither one of which we now have learning was really proven to be very healthy, but why were kids drawn to wanting to make a better difference? And that put them up to be easily manipulated by people that had more nefarious agendas. So that got it started.

When I discovered the Wittenberg Door, was the perfect outlet for all the anger that I felt about the church I mean I did go to divinity school because there’s a side of silly me thought I wanted to be like my father. Until I realized had I done that I don’t think I’d be here today. The church would have crushed me. I see a lot of my friends that have a similar spirit to me and the institutional church just crushed them. They do so much better when they’re outside the church doing their own thing instead of trying to function within what I would say is a highly narcissistic institution that I’m convinced that the institutional church is dead. I think there’s some individual churches doing some great work, but I think their institutional structure is just too necrotic. And through the Wittenberg Door, we began to satirize that. And that led to a lot of things. I did a lot of the faith and politics stuff. I also started when God’s Politics blog became a best seller.

That’s when I started critiquing the progressives and all of a sudden all the progressives that loved the Door, they loved how we went after the conservatives, that’s when they started to hammer us. They could not accept the fact that there could be narcissism in their midst in a more covert form. As one who grew up with the frozen chosen, as you call the Episcopalies, I would say hell yes, it’s rampant.

Ruth Perry (10:47)
I had a friend on, maybe a month ago to share a story of being a survivor of a marriage with a narcissist and her husband is Benjamin L. Corey, a progressive Christian writer about peace and nonviolence. But then in his personal life, just super controlling and passive aggressive and very much a narcissistic sponge, feeding off of my friend. And I’m just at a loss of how does someone like my friend get any justice? For right now, she was alienated from her children because of litigation after their separation. She can’t even see her children. And so it’s such a frustrating situation.

Becky (11:24)
It is and I don’t have an easy answer. I’m not a lawyer. I can’t give legal advice. I did notice that what was interesting I’m thinking about Phillip Yancey, there’s another case that came into play and that was very frustrating in that revelations came out that he had an affair. There was something involving his assistant that sounded a little nefarious. I mean, she died kind of suddenly in a freak climbing accident in a gym.

Ruth Perry (11:33)
Yeah!

Becky (11:47)
Which if you’re an experienced climber, almost never happens. So I’m still, there’s something a little fishy there. I’m just saying, I think in that case, he would never accept your responsibility. He never, he just said, I’m so great. He viewed the women in his life as pawns. And I think the best we can do is you just speak your truth to power. And I’ve been in that situation that she’s been in. When I saw abuse within the US emergent church movement in 2006, I spoke out.

And I got hammered. I got doxxed. I got cyber bullied. I was not was a very unpleasant situation. And the more I learned, I taught myself what gaslighting was and what scapegoating was, I understood the dynamics of what was happening. I learned how to do gray rock. ‘Cause in the beginning. I appeared crazy.

I would be like, what the, you know, what do you mean? I am not jealous. I am simply pointing out the fact that you claim that you’re inclusive and you have one female speaker. And then once the female speaker got on board, she immediately became just like the men because she had to preserve her place of power. So I was simply saying, you’re promoting religionless Christianity. And there’s a hierarchy. There’s a lot of abuse within this system. There’s this private networks that are spreading all kind of stuff. And because I had not

done enough work on myself and my own trauma triggers, I came off as crazy. I’m not going to recreate how I came off, but it was not to my best interest. So the first thing I say to anybody is get your own self together by finding whatever somatic therapy works for you. For me, it was EMDR. If I had not had EMDR, I don’t think I could have written the book because I would have been too triggered by bringing up past traumas. And I think that’s the first thing I would say is have you done your oxygen mask, taking care of yourself. And the second is what did not exist in 2006 that exists now are support groups. When Tony Jones tried to re-emerge as another emergent church speaker, other people all of a sudden started calling his crap out. That did not happen in 2006. Everybody was still part of, I want to be part of the cool kids crap.

Your friend now has other women who have been through something similar. You know Tia Levings has an excellent list of trauma resources on her page. Her book I Belong to Me is coming out in May. I would give it to her as a gift, you know What do you need to do for yourself? And once you get to that point, I think you’ll be in a better place. Your kids are gonna see a different mother They may be so poisoned in top that that you can’t control but you can control your response to a situation and find other people to support. When I had an experience, my first revelation of the narcissism, I had gotten to a professional and personal relationship with a mindfulness therapist who I’d later discovered is a narcissist. A malignant narcissist at best may even have some psychopathic tendencies. I couldn’t tell if he enjoyed inflicting his pain or he just didn’t care.

But I joined a narcissistic support group and I realized, this is 2016, so the research was much newer than it is now. And I realized I’m not alone. Other women have the same experience. This is a pattern. I could not see the pattern because I believed in the promise of whatever this person was preaching. I believed in the goodness. I had a good heart. I’m an empath and my God, we’re magnets for narcissists.

I’m now narcissistic resistant. Narcissists don’t approach me like they used to. You can become narcissistic resistant. They will go to somebody else. And you have to also get over your fear of missing out. And I’m also over my hypervigilance. If I narcissist, someone that I know has extreme narcissistic tendencies, hurting someone else, I’ll just point it out, but I’m not going to try to rescue people. We’ve made so much progress.

We’re in the narcissistic research right now where alcoholism was in 1980. I started the recovery movement actually in 83. And it was very nascent. There wasn’t a whole lot out there, but we were starting to understand that alcoholism was not a mental illness. It was a very complex dynamic that impacted the entire family. And how was I impacted? Being raised in an extended family of alcoholics who I now realize are many of were narcissists, including the ones that aren’t alcoholics. I mean, it was pretty much, I can count on one hand, the number of extended family members I know that are not narcissists, to be honest. And I began to realize a lot of that. And I think for people, find other people, they exist and you’ll develop a network and you’ll discover you’re not alone.

And once you realize you’re not alone, that eliminates so much of the anxiety and pain that you’re feeling. At least that’s been my experience.

Ruth Perry (16:16)
It does seem like narcissism is such a systemic and widespread issue in our culture today. And just listening to you speak, I’m a pastor’s kid as well, although my parents were teetotalers because they both came from alcoholic families. But that same dynamic was still in the family. also ⁓ dynamic those in my family that you name in your book is manipulators and martyrs.

You were quoting Brad Sargent’s friend, Linda O: “Manipulators and martyrs go together in matched pairs,” and I was thinking about how women are conditioned in the church to make ourselves smaller and to be quiet and meek and gentle and so we’re just trained from a very early age to be the martyr. And then we end up in, a lot of us end up in relationships like this where there’s a manipulator. And part of that is the culture training men too, to be this way where they feel entitled to things and they feel special.

Becky (17:00)
Mm-hmm. And then there’s people like me that just push back from the get-go and we’re always excluded. And it’s taking me a long time to develop sympathy for what I call the mean girls. I’ve been thinking about this and I began to realize that, my sister was a classic mean girl. And what it was is she from the beginning was ranked based on her beauty. She was ranked based on her looks, her ability to present. She never did the beauty pageant cheerleader thing.

But that is one of the dynamics, is that we want our women to look a certain way. We want them to appeal to the male gaze. And if you don’t, in the 70s and 80s, you’d be called lesbian, you’d be called, worse, which was really absolutely horrible for women that actually preferred same-sex relationships. To me, to use that term as a slur is just absolutely god-awful. And I kept telling them, no, I’m not a lesbian. I just don’t want a guy that’s going to be like the husband you guys married kind of thing. You know, and you tell people that sometimes you make a conscious decision that given my family dynamics, I decided it was best that I remained unmarried and without children. just decided that is the best. I cannot give a kid a decent family life. And I also need to do a lot of work on myself so I can now find a lot healthier relationships.

And so I made a conscious decision not to involve innocent humans in my family’s dynamic, which was not an easy decision to make, but it was one that I realized I needed to do because it was not be fair to an innocent third party. I think with the me girls, I just realized they got ahead by using their sexuality. They’re the ones that Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein, other women preyed on. They wouldn’t have preyed on me because they could tell by looking at me, I wasn’t going to be that compliant. My attraction to narcissism was more the spiritual guru promising this. That’s where I would be attracted to people. But in terms of just the whole mean girl persona, I I resented those women like crazy for quite a while because they could make your life miserable. If you were the little nerdy writer, those kind of women can just make life hell.

And even today, I encounter them sometimes. I’ll do spirits reporting and beer reporting. I’m often the only woman there, so it’s no big deal. But if I do wine reporting, some of those women can just be absolutely mean girl central. And some of the publicists, and and I used to be worried about that. I used to get really like, I don’t fit into these women. Now I realize we’re all going through something, even these women, these beauty queen patterns. You you see these 24 year olds that are dating 60, 70, 80 year olds, it’s not healthy, but they’re going through something on their gotta be something going on, because a lot of the mean girls are not happy. Because if you are really pleased and content with yourself, you don’t need to be an outraging bitch to other people. You don’t need to do that.

What is it about you that makes them feel like in order for them to affirm you, they have to put you down. And over time, I think these women develop a narcissistic core. I don’t know if my sister, she didn’t start out that way, but over time she became more and more self-centered because her looks, that was her currency.

Ruth Perry (20:08)
When I started reading, I thought that you’d talk a lot more about Trump. I was surprised that you didn’t. And the way that evangelical and conservative Christians have embraced him, even though he appears to many people to be a Machiavellian, like the worst kind of just really dark triad personality type narcissist. What connections do you see between spiritual gaslighting and broader cultural patterns in politics and patriarchy and nationalism and all of those intersections.

Becky (20:37)
I had an agent try to sell this book in 2018. The original book proposal was Trump focused. Publishers didn’t want it. They said, we’re done with Trump books. We have enough books. Steve Hassan did the case against Trump. There is the book, Dangerous Case, Bandy Lee edited a book on the dangerous case of Donald Trump, lays it out. She ended up getting fired, by the way, for diagnosing someone which was very questionable, but still you’re not supposed to diagnose.

I believe that Trump is a symptom. We’ve growing up as a kid. Do you remember Lyndon LaRouche? Do you remember these we’ve always had crackpots. We’ve always had nutcases. The question for me was why in 2016 when they were presented with a slate of reasonable Republican candidates The voters chose Trump that is the question that I wanted to answer it to me. That’s a deeper question that was you brewing for some time now. When you look through his story, we’ve had these church splits that have been simmering and simmering Trump is just when it look at 1979, that’s the year the Episcopal Church first ordained women.

It’s also the formation of the Moral Majority. And it was not founded on abortion. Abortion came out in 1973. Naveen Jeltsin did not give a hoot. Jerry Falwell was quoted, That’s a Catholic issue. But they were really upset about was interracial dating and that’s why they really formed. But they pretty soon had to do, we have to do a family-friendly thing because even in 79 you couldn’t say we’re the white party. You just could not say that and get elected in 79. So we had the Moral Majority.

And then you look at the year I started writing for the Wittenberg Door, 1994 was the year the Republicans took over Congress with the Christian Coalition. And we thought, wow, that’s going to be… And then you found Clinton in 96. In addition to the Monica Lewinsky scandal, he also formed the DLC, which really started to alienate a lot of progressives. You can see a lot of these shifts starting to happen in a lot of years.

We thought in 2008 when Obama was elected, he was the first president to acknowledge atheists at the National Prayer Breakfast. We thought we’re hitting this progressive revolution. in 2016, I was really excited. The DNC put up the most diverse list of candidates ever. We had people of color. We had a gay man, more women, this dynamic lineup. The DNC stacked the deck and gave us Hillary.

And that was the moment I said, we’re going to get President Trump. And my friends who are progressive said, you’re wrong. I said, no. The will of the people were ignored. You have enough Bernie bros that want change. They’re going to vote for change. They did. And that’s how we got Trump. And then in 2020, the Democrats again, had a pretty good lineup, not quite as diverse. They gave us Biden, who we did not want. I felt that the progressives kept stacking the deck and further frustrating. And when people get frustrated and they feel like no one’s listening to them, that’s when they’re susceptible to cult dynamics. That’s when they’re susceptible to saying to they’re not listening to you.

Because guess what? They weren’t. And if people feel that no one is listening to them, they will go to someone who is telling them exactly what they need to hear. That is the moment when people are the most susceptible to joining cults. I think that’s what happened in 2020. And then in 2024, well, we’re going to give you Biden again, even though you don’t really want him. And then at the last minute, we’re going to switch aroo and give you Kamala, who never won a primary, she was never the most popular candidate. And then boom, Trump gets elected again.

I’m looking at this from a broader perspective. I also think that people did not realize in 2024 how bad it was going to get. I think they thought they were taking a malignant narcissist who didn’t care about anybody, but he was going to keep America out of war. He was going keep America first. He was going do something with sensible immigrant. don’t know if sensible is not the word I’ve used, but I think people thought it was going be a continuation of the first term. I don’t think they thought that you could get worse than Sarah Huckabee Sanders. I don’t think they thought you could get worse than Jeff Sessions and Richard Barr. I don’t think they could get worse than whoever was his defense secretary. I mean, the moment Pete Hegsath and they changed his Department of War, this is when I felt it went from malignant narcissism to Machiavellianism. Because in the beginning, I do think there’s a sense that, and anybody who lives in New York City knows this, he does not care about anybody but himself. He’s mobbed up.

The media wanted this conflict circus. I think if we had investigated his ties to Roy Cohn, for example, really thoroughly, this was scary. Roy Cohn was Joseph McCarthy’s lawyer. That was Trump’s lawyer. Roy Cohn repped several mob families. He introduced him to these mob families. And the media didn’t investigate that because I think they wanted the Hillary Trump matchup. That was great for ratings.

putting Biden against Trump, that was hysterical. I mean, that was like watching a really bad Saturday Night Live sketch to watch those two men debate. I was watching this going, no matter who gets elected, we’re either going to be screwed or absolutely completely effed. And in 2024, when they did the switcheroo, I said, this is not, we’re going to get Trump again. And I just knew it. I didn’t know how bad it was going to be.

What people might want to realize is that there’s a difference between a malignant narcissist and full-blown cult. The distinction is a cult leader by nature is an extreme narcissist. They’re also a psychopath, meaning they enjoy what they’re doing. A narcissist doesn’t care a psychopath enjoys. That’s how I distinguish it. And the Machiavellian nature is they want to take over the world. They want domination over their entire universe.

Whereas in our society it just wants to be number one. They don’t feel the need to dominate. They need to be the center of attention, but there’s not this need for the world domination that you see now. And we’ve got ourselves into this pickle and I don’t see the Democrats and the progressives offering candidates that are really going to get us out of it. At least on the presidential level. On the local level, yes, that’s why I’m shifting my focus somewhat, I think we could help rebuild at the local level. How do we care for our neighbor? There’s a difference between Trump and MAGA, and I make that distinction. And where we go from here, I’m not gonna be a politician, I’m not gonna be a fortune teller, but that’s why I didn’t make it Trump specific because this is gonna continue when he’s gone. MAGA is gonna be here. And there are also ardent progressives.

And I think it would help to look at what were legitimate concerns that people had the progressives ignored. And that’s the beginning of a step of healing is to look at that component. Like how many women who were MAHA, they just wanted alternative treatments for their kids. A lot of them, they were not full blown MAGA, but all of sudden they felt the Big Pharma was telling them how to rule their lives.

The Big Pharma was calling them idiots or education was calling them idiots for wanting to homeschool their kids. They wanted to do alternative things that were legal and justified and they were not allowed to do it. You know, women were trying to give their little kid who has epilepsy, giving him CBD and discovering it worked and then being told they couldn’t give it. They had to give the kid pharma drug that A, they couldn’t afford and B, cause their kid to be sick. What would have happened if the women who were interested in natural health had been taken more seriously, would they have gone full blown? So you always have to think of what could you have done? Were you so full of your own hubris and your own self-righteousness that you didn’t listen to what other people were asking and demanding? And I think that’s where I’m seeing the progressive movement is, is are they willing to listen to alternative views?

There’s a large group of people that I think are dissatisfied with everything. What are they going to do about that dissatisfaction? Where can they put that?

Ruth Perry (28:17)
So what is it narcissistic personalities that both woo and wound people?

Becky (28:23)
I would call it the Jekyll-Hyde syndrome. They can be incredibly charismatic. They’re also very tuned into when you’re vulnerable. You see this with certain rather nefarious dating coaches is I will give you what you’re looking for. You’re looking for women empowerment. You’re looking to explore your female sexuality. You’re looking to do better your business. You’re looking to be a better mother. Whatever you are looking for that you’re not finding, they have the answer. And they will just love bomb you to bits. They will give you everything you want. And to the point where you don’t realize how much money you’re spending, how much time you’re spending, because you’re getting that fix. You’re getting that high. You’re getting that adrenaline rush, that oxycutin. You’re getting that, ooh, that dopamine hit. It feels so good to finally be recognized, especially if you come from a background where you haven’t been recognized.

And then the moment, the nanosecond, you disagree. The moment you say, I can’t afford to pay it this month, I need to take some time for myself, I need to step back a little bit. Whatever, you have just drained them of their narcissistic supply. The moment you cut it off, they will turn into to Mr. Hyde and do what is called narcissistic collapse. They will go completely irrational. I think for a lot of us, we do get disappointed. If someone cancels on you last minute, you’re going to be disappointed. But that’s different than someone going completely ballistic. It’s someone saying, I’m disappointed that we’re not making this projections right. What can we do to make this better versus I’m disappointed in you for failing?

After you have a narcissistic collapse hit you, you sit there going what the hell just happened? It’s not as simple like I need to have a talk with you about your work performance or we need to discuss you being a bit cleaner or bit whatever. It’s complete annihilation of you or all of sudden they get with a one out of you, you wrote those three articles I needed you to write to make me feel good, okay, bye, I’m gone. They took what they needed from you and then they left you. Just bye. And you’re starting going, what the hell just happened here? And their words don’t match their actions. And after a while, you start to find yourself going crazy, which is why I find it very helpful to identify the pattern because it keeps you from going crazy.

Now I can identify it and I go, okay, that person’s having narcissistic collapse. I’m going to treat him like a three year old, a toddler. Just walk away. I’m not going to engage. You cannot rationalize with a toddler. You cannot be reasonable. And if you give him his binky or his Nobel Peace Prize, it’s not going to solve anything. It’s a temporary, it’s like a pacifier situation. They’re going to continue to escalate. This is not going to stop until you walk away and then let them find somebody else. And over time, it starts to crumble. And that’s what you’re seeing now is the starting of the crumbling.

Maybe I’m too naive to think that, but I do believe, and I’m looking at the Epstein files to me as the beginning of a revelation of we’re finally starting to see a lot of stuff start to crumble. And that’s a good thing. I say, hallelujah.

Ruth Perry (31:14)
What is the connection to and sex abuse in these kind of high control groups?

Becky (31:20)
Because they can. I do not understand the attraction to children. I do not understand why any man would want to have a relationship with someone who’s not age appropriate. I don’t get it. And I think that some of it is these men do not want adult relationships. They want relationships they can control. Men have always wanted, some have wanted significant younger women, and there’s always women who are willing naive enough.

In the case of children, you start to tell a kid who comes from a very broken home who’s never had any kind of love. They’re so susceptible to being loved bombed. And all of a sudden they’ve never had anything. Wow, I got a couple hundred dollars just for doing this little act. Can’t be that bad. And then before they know it, they’ve been trafficked beyond their beliefs because they didn’t understand what was going on. They didn’t understand the dynamics. An older woman would walk into that and go, what the hell?

But then I’m dealing, like I’m looking into something, as you might have there was a UMC minister in Missouri and she the executive assistant and then the grounds manager for Epstein Island. claims she didn’t see anything. At the time she was studying to be a minister, as I understand And the UMC has suspended her pending investigation because they feel that her involvement this case went against the UMC’s code of ethics around treatment of women. Hallelujah for small victories. However, I’m very shocked that she claimed she saw nothing. I mean, you see the photos of the house. You didn’t think it was odd there was a dentist chair in there. You didn’t think it was odd there were photos of underage girls. There was like Lolita on steroids.

You’re a pastor and I don’t expect a pastor to be a complete intuitive, because we all have different personality types. But if you’re a pastor and you don’t think there’s something wrong with unaccompanied minors getting off of a plane to meet a group of old men, if your spidey sense doesn’t do anything and you claim you saw nothing, then you’re not qualified to be a minister because at a basic core. A minister needs to notice when something that serious is going on. I would expect a pastor to know that youth minister is getting a little too handsy. Yes, that volunteer is being inappropriate. If you can’t even see something as blatantly obvious as underage girls, unaccompanied often with a lot of older men, and you think this is just a pool party, you’re not qualified for ordained ministry.

And the fact that she got called out on it, I’m glad the UMC is doing the right thing. What no one has figured out is how did she meet I want to know how did a UMC minister from Missouri meet Jeffrey Epstein and get offered that job? So always interested in looking at the connections because Epstein has made some referrals. He referred Eric Metaxas’ book to somebody.

Ruth Perry (33:59)
Yeah.

Becky (34:02)
No, I take it back, Ken Starr referred Eric Metaxas’ book to him. And then there was an instance where he forwarded on Rick Warren’s newsletter. Well, okay, what is Ken Starr doing referring the book written by the guy who was one earliest Trump supporters? Eric Metaxas was supporting Trump before anybody else did, just about. So he was a key figure in helping Trump get elected. Why is Ken Barr recommending this Bonhoeffer book, the book is terrible. Every scholar said it’s terrible. Then you have other, references like that. Epstein recommended Dobson’s Dare to Discipline book to a young survivor who was having problems with her family. These are very evangelical books. How are they getting into that network? So far that’s the only Christian connection I’ve been able to find.

Deepak Chopra is another thing. He claims I didn’t do anything inappropriate. And you’re sitting here discussing how, you know, God is a construct, cute girls are real. And I would never go to a guru that said that. That is disgusting. I mean, that is just the way he’s discussing about girls. Like, did you bring me girls? Did you bring me girls? You’re a grown adult male who is responsible, thanks to Oprah in large part, for bringing in all of these concepts of the East to the West. Oprah basically, now that we’ve realized, was a walking show for predators. She gave us Dr. Phil, she gave us Dr. Oz, she gave us the anti-vax movement. She supported John of God. And if you Google John of God in Brazil, he is in jail bizarre medical experiments and pedophilia.

So I think we have to look at ourselves and why did we ever trust Oprah? She’s not trustworthy. Look at all the people she’s introduced us to. She never took any responsibility. She also introduced us to the secret of Dr. Lisa Rankin is someone that I would recommend your listeners check out. She’s one of the people that spoke on Deepak’s stage, one of the few people speaking out. All these people that stood and profited by being connected to Deepak have not spoken out. And yet she did. A few people are speaking out. There’s some outliers who are saying, I’m willing to risk my book contract. I’m willing to risk my speaking, my place on the center stage. I’m willing to do what needs to be done to make this right. Now, why they didn’t speak out before is another story, but they’re speaking out now. And I think this is similar to the Weinstein in the Cosby case. It takes a while to convince people that someone this powerful is this evil.

Ruth Perry (36:24)
I had a funny interaction. I met Eric Metaxas seven or eight years ago. I was homeschooling my children by day and waitressing by night. And I live in the vicinity of Liberty University. And he had a group of conservative influencers at dinner at the steakhouse. And they were there for some event at the Falkirk Center at Liberty. And after the dinner, Eric Metaxas was standing up and he asked me if I knew who he was. And I said, I do know who you are. And he said, that’s so nice. I’m going to let my wife know that you said that. What did I say?

Becky (36:57)
I interviewed him for The Door and this is before the Wilberforce book. He was anti post veggie tales, not quite the best selling author. And it was one of most worst interviews of my life. It’s just all the oxygen in the room was sucked out and he was incredibly full of himself.

But what I appreciate about that was that I could get it, I knew to stay away from it from get-go. It was the progressives. Like I was drawn in to Nadia Bolz Weber, Pete Rollins, that more progressive line of thought. And actually I endorsed some of their stuff in the beginning, because in the beginning it sounded really good. So then all of sudden the moment they became bestselling authors, or if not bestselling in the case of Rollins, the moment they got their little click going.

It was just all of a sudden, ooh, wow. I mean, they were just as obnoxious as Eric Metaxas, but in a slightly subtler way. And it can be really when someone writes something that you believe and then you meet them and you go, crap. And so I’m telling people, take what’s good. Okay, if they wrote something that you enjoy, acknowledge that. There’s nothing wrong with you for taking someone’s words and saying, that word’s really…

Move me but just know that person didn’t live out those teachings, you know and try to find people that did live out those teachings They exist. I mean Henri Nouwen, there was never anything about him and he’s someone that I continue to rely on yes, there were some abuses within the community for him, but it was after his death. He had nothing to do with that There are a lot of good spiritual thinkers that don’t engage in this. So the question is don’t kick yourself, but then look and say where can I find better fruit?

Where can I find fruit from people who like that? Which is why I continue to recommend Tia Leving. There’s a lot of people in the religious trauma field that I tell people, be careful. Similar to the recovery movement. There’s people out there wanting to make a name for themselves as deconstruction coaches, religious trauma coaches, whatever you want to help someone with their faith. And that’s why I say I’m a writer. I mean, have an MSW.

Actually clinical social work is going to be particular, but I’m not licensed right now and I am going to sell myself as a writer. I am not going to sell myself as a life coach. I’m gonna stay in my own lane, I’m gonna leave that up to qualified trauma therapists who are working currently in that field and I will provide the education to hopefully give people the awareness that yeah maybe that kind of help would be helpful for me. But there are, a lot of people out there trying to sell you their own shtick and there’s some really good solid voices. And it’s important to kind of distinguish between the two of them. And it takes a while. I mean, to me, one of the biggest things is do you get a sense of community around them? Do you get a sense of care?

Or it’s all about them and their accomplishments and what they can do and what their success rate And we’re kind of in this gray kind of new frontier. The research in the narcissism is only about 10 years old. You still have a lot of therapists that think religious trauma is BS. They don’t think that you get trauma from a religious experience. So there’s a lot of education that needs to happen. Similar to where I said where alcoholism was in the 1980s.

Ruth Perry (40:00)
I also had EMDR therapy because I realized been reading about religious trauma for a long and it didn’t ever occur to me that I had religious trauma. But then it kind of clicked in place after many years of like myself just trying to make sense of all the different things I had experienced in the church and often very painful and things and having that EMDR therapy was extremely helpful.

Becky (40:26)
Oh yeah, and it’s not the only form of therapy that could work. There are other somatic forms. There’s brain spotting, emotional isometrics, a lot of different treatments. And you find a therapist that works for you. How I chose my therapist for EMDR is I began to ask and see, did she really listen to me? Like I described to her that I didn’t want to get married. I didn’t want to have kids. And I was describing my relationship status and whatnot.

I look to see in her eyes, was she judging You know, is saying that whatever choices, if I make healthy legal lifestyle choices, those should be mine. Like if you want to legally choose to be a sex, if you want to become a sex worker, that’s your personal decision versus being coerced into something. So I’d say when you go to a therapist, how does that therapist treat you? Do you get any kind of a creepy vibe? Get the hell out of there.

Find another therapist. There’s plenty of therapists that do EMDR, that do somatic work. And a lot of that is for women. Your gut is such a good tool and we don’t use it. We kind of just say, I’m not feeling good. I’ll just go take some Pepto-Bismol. We don’t tune into why are you feeling that? No, don’t medicate that. Don’t drink it away. You don’t need a glass of wine to deal with this. Think of why you’re feeling this way.

And that tells you something isn’t quite right. Now, this therapist might be right for somebody else, but it’s not right for you. Not everything is narcissistic. But something just might not be right for you. The more you’re in tune with what you need and what you want, you’re not going to be coerced into just doing and going along with what everybody else says.

And you also don’t hear what the mean girls say, which for women, I think that’s something that we really need to focus on because a lot of the mean girls got ahead and those of us who weren’t mean girls didn’t get the job. But what I’m starting to realize now is they paid a price for getting that job. They have had to sacrifice their looks. I mean, we can make fun of Maro Lago face all we want, but those women had to subject whoever they are to so deep inside of them that it’s almost like there’s not a person there anymore. I don’t know if they were born that way, I don’t know a lot of their childhoods, but they’ve become an incredibly self-centered narcissistic person that can only think of themselves from their own lens of beauty. And they’re doing whatever they can do to maintain their place of power. That is clearly a narcissistic move. I don’t know how many of them started out that way.

I suspect it’s like my sister that they were told from a very young age, they’re beautiful. Were never told they were smart. Were never told they could do whatever they wanted to do. So they began to focus primarily on developing their looks. And as they got to be in their thirties and forties, it got even harsher. You know, they had to continue to maintain that persona.

Ruth Perry (43:02)
Well, your book is a very helpful guide, social commentary that you give and your insight and how well you understand what is going on and how well you describe all these terms mean. Narcissism, gaslighting, the echo chamber. There’s so many different things that you describe and explain and it seems like you’ve read a hundred books in the process of writing this book.

Becky (43:24)
Well, it helps to read all the research that’s out there. And in fact, a lot of the narcissism books, what I didn’t like about it was they were focusing on dating, or parenting, which I think is an important thing. But it was also having a black and white view. And I take a gray view, which is why I said, if something’s risen to the level of malignancy, like what I was finding in the U.S. Emergent Church world, then I feel it’s wrong to participate in that group’s activities because you’re supporting an abusive culture. But if someone is just a full blown self-centered narcissist, but yet you enjoy their comedy show, I we don’t evaluate musicians or actresses or we say we like the show. And I found that by looking at something like, okay, I like your show. It really changes how I feel because I’m not looking to form a community.

I’m looking to have an enjoyable evening enjoying the social lubricant because we all need some degree of social lubricant. We have a loneliness epidemic. But I’ve also learned it’s okay to be alone. It’s better to be alone than to be trying to get the approval of a narcissistic system, a narcissistic community. And I was one of these Uber volunteers. I love to help. And for me, just pulling back and saying, nope, not going to do it. That’s been life changing for me truly.

And you can find communities that care. I go to tasting rooms like Misara, this winery run by a Persian winemaker and have an incredibly connected experience. At Kristoff Farms, Nick Kristoff and his wife, they do cider and community building conversations through cider and their Pinot Noir wines. There ways, even though you can say, oh, this one aspect of the industry is very narcissistic and superficial and only cares about wine scores and who’s this and who’s that. There’s another side that’s really connective and really community and grounded in sustainability. And I tell people, my reporting, I look to do stuff that’s reporting on sustainability, community, spirituality. And I consciously look for things that have those elements. If they don’t have it, I might say, this is a nice evening. Nice dinner, nice glass of wine, nice music, nice show. But I’m not gonna expect that to be my community connective place. I’m gonna go to those community connective places that really care about me. And it’s life changing once you can learn to make that shift. And I wish the best for everybody. But take care of yourself, for your friend and find other people.

There are other people like you. This is emerging as more and more of us start to come to these awarenesses. We’re finding other support groups. Tons of podcasts. I’ve been on a number of them and you know, there’s a lot of conversations happening, how to find authenticity. I think people are searching for that in this world. And I don’t think you can find it at the national level, but I think you can find it at the grassroots level.

Ruth Perry (46:02)
Thank you so much for all the work you’ve done to be a guide to others into this more hopeful and healthy way to live. Where is the best place for people to find you online and find your work?

Becky (46:12)
Well, it’s available to any online, most online retailers. My sub stack is, you Google Becky Garrison or Gaslighting for God. It’s my sub stack. That’s where I post a number of pieces. I also have a Facebook author page, Becky Garrison writer, and then an Instagram is Becky underscore Garrison. I’m also on LinkedIn as Becky Garrison and there’s a YouTube channel. So, but I don’t use the latter two that frequently. I’m also moving more and more towards Substack because I find out can have more substantial conversations there. The noise in Meta Universe is just not helpful and I’m not going to pay to play with Mark Zuckerberg. He does not deserve my money.

Ruth Perry (46:49)
Well thank you so much for being here today Becky. Would you like to have the last word before we sign off?

Becky (46:53)
No, well, just thank you for the work that you’re doing as well. I have not lost my optimism that first drew me to narcissistic energies. I just am now being far more discerning. I would say to them, be an optimist, but also be a discerning optimist, not a naive.

Ruth Perry (47:09)
Alright, thank you so much. God bless, Becky.

Becky (47:11)
You too, thank you so much.


Did you enjoy this episode? Please subscribe, rate or review us on YouTubeSpotifyApple PodcastsAmazon MusicSubstack, and more! Your support means the world. God bless!

015 I Tracy Downing Shares Her Story of Narcissistic Abuse by Her Progressive Christian Ex-Husband

In this episode, my friend Tracy Downing shares her profoundly painful journey through narcissistic abuse in her marriage to and divorce from Progressive Christian writer and speaker, Benjamin L. Corey. Post-separation litigation and parental alienation have been especially devastating for Tracy. I believe sharing stories like Tracy’s is very important, because abuse is rampant in patriarchal churches and families, and awareness of what abuse looks like is low.

It’s difficult to share a story like Tracy’s, with so many layers and contributing factors, without taking the time to label behaviors and name impact. So I wanted to share some more about narcissistic and post-separation abuse in this post for those who may have recognized their own relationship in Tracy’s story.

Tracy spoke about being labelled rebellious in her Independent Pentecostal Church, being called a “bad apple” that needed to be “plucked” before she ruined her sisters, of having five or six men attempt to exorcise demons from her. This was not only traumatic spiritual abuse, this conditioning in her high-control religious upbringing contributed to Tracy being in an abusive relationship as an adult. She was taught to be a “good girl,” to shut herself off from her own feelings and experience in order to please others, to question her own voice and to be disempowered so that men can be centered and deferred to. Her nervous system never felt safe and secure, she was always striving to be more and do more in order to be accepted. This resulted in her being a high-achieving person as well as being disembodied from herself. She was also primed by religious conditioning to make her marriage work, at any cost.

During Tracy’s separation from Ben, her therapist told her she had experienced extreme narcissistic abuse. We cannot say definitively that Benjamin L. Corey is a narcissist without a formal diagnosis, but I believe a very strong case could be made. Let me define narcissism and highlight behaviors that fit into the categorization of narcissistic abuse:

Narcissism is a personality trait characterized by a long-term pattern of grandiosity, an excessive need for admiration, and a profound lack of empathy for others. Narcissism is found in more males than females. Narcissists are pre-occupied with power and success and believe they are superior than others and deserving of special treatment. Core traits include self-centeredness, vanity, and high levels of entitlement. Common behaviors include manipulation, gaslighting, exploitation of others, and intense reactions to criticism. It is either an inability or an unwillingness in narcissists to recognize the needs and feelings of others. They rather tend to be very critical and envious of others. They have difficulty managing their emotions and behaviors, especially dealing with stress and adapting to change. Narcissists are often depressed and moody. And underlying their grandiosity is deep shame, insecurity and fear of being exposed.

Emotional abuse can be just as painful and destructive as physical abuse. Often times, an emotionally abused woman will wish her husband would hit her, so that she could leave the marriage with a clear conscious. Emotional abuse is disorienting and debilitating. When Tracy questioned Ben’s behavior or they disagreed about anything, he employed the classic abuser’s response: DARVO (Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender). In a healthy relationship, you can bring an issue to the table and work it out in a meaningful and constructive way. In a relationship with an abuser, every issue you bring up gets turned back on you. You learn it is easier to put up with the toxic behaviors rather than be punished for expressing any of your own needs.

Ben’s utilization of DARVO has been especially impactful in the aftermath of their divorce, as he has used the court system to attack Tracy and to paint himself and their daughters as her victims. Here is an excellent resource Tracy sent me about post-separation abuse and parental alienation, High Conflict Education and Resources. I compiled a list of abuse resources that you can find here. Dr. Diane Langberg, Chuck DeGroat, and Natalie Hoffman are great advocates for victims of abuse. If you recognize your own relationship in Tracy’s story, I pray you find healing and safety.

Tracy wrote to me some key things to note about Narcissists:
1. Losing control over you–Their biggest fear is you thinking for yourself. You surrounding yourself with better people. You focusing on other things. When you stop being predictable or emotionally available, they feel threatened because control is the only way they know how to feel “safe.”
2. Being exposed for who they really are–Narcissists work hard to maintain a perfect image. The idea that someone could reveal their cruelty, lies, or manipulation is terrifying, it threatens the entire persona they built to hide their insecurity.
3. Being ignored–Narcissists love attention (you’ve probably noticed this). When you ignore them or act indifferent, their entire sense of power collapses. To them it feels like abandonment, and they panic the moment they can’t get a response out of you.
4. Someone seeing through their lies–They depend on confusion to stay in power. Your confusion, so that they can keep manipulating and gaslighting you. So when you show clarity, self-awareness, and emotional distance, they know they can’t twist reality anymore…and trust me, that makes them anxious.
5. You healing and moving on–Your healing means they no longer have emotional access to you. They’re terrified of you becoming strong enough to no longer need them, miss them, or react to them.

People are not always what they appear to be. Narcissists can be charming and project many admirable characteristics publicly. But who we are behind closed doors matters. We should be the same person with our family as we are with the public. Benjamin L. Corey is a popular writer and speaker in the Progressive Christianity space. Sadly, Progressives often repeat the fundamentalist systems they think they have rejected. To be truly Christlike is to consider others before yourself, lay down your life and interests for others, love patiently and kindly, without keeping a record of wrongs. God is love, and anyone who truly knows God is loving. As Dwight L Moody said, “If a man doesn’t treat his wife right, I don’t want to hear him talk about Christianity.”

You can listen to our conversation on The Beautiful Kingdom Builders Podcast on YouTubeSpotifyApple PodcastsAmazon MusicSubstack, and more! If you find our conversation helpful, please share it with a friend, rate and review, and subscribe so you never miss an episode!

TRANSCRIPT:

Ruth Perry (00:17)
There’s a quote from Dwight L. Moody that says, “If a man doesn’t treat his wife right, I don’t want to hear him talk about Christianity.” Today I’m talking with Tracy, who was married to popular progressive Christian writer and speaker, Benjamin L. Corey. In our conversation, Tracy shares parts of a decades long story that carries many layers and deep emotional trauma. It’s impossible to unpack everything in less than an hour, but Tracy offers a powerful glimpse into the realities that she has endured.

Before we begin, I want to acknowledge that abuse is often hidden and insidious. Silence protects abusers, not victims. And so this isn’t an easy topic, but real lives are harmed when abuse goes unaddressed and we’re called to bring light into darkness. When someone speaks up about abuse, it usually comes after tremendous courage and it deserves to be taken seriously.

After listening, you can go visit thebeautifulkingdombuilders.com for show notes, where I’ll highlight key aspects of Tracy’s story and include resources for anyone who may recognize similar dynamics in their own life. Without further ado, here is today’s episode.

Ruth Perry (01:26)
My guest today is Tracy Downing, a leadership coach and grief coach and a personal friend of mine from living in Maine. And so I’m so pleased to have you here today, Tracy.

Tracy (01:36)
Thank you. Thank you, Ruth. So good to be here with you.

Ruth Perry (01:40)
This is a conversation abuse and about coming out from conditioning in conservative Christianity and then reliving those patterns marriage. Your story has so many layers that I think people are gonna relate to sadly. And the best place to start is at the very beginning. So where did you grow up Tracy? And what was your faith background?

Tracy (02:03)
Well, I grew up in Maine, small town in Maine. I was part of the Pentecostal movement from, I think, birth and ended up in a Independent Pentecostal church, meaning it was its only kind. It had no sister churches or, you know, home church, if you will.

Ruth Perry (02:21)
Similar to Independent Baptist probably culturally, but different worship style for sure.

Tracy (02:26)
Different worship style, yes. And it wasn’t like, I think like Assembly of Gods, or like the Catholic Church, or the Vineyard. This was just a one and done church.

Ruth Perry (02:35)
So I met you in Maine as an adult, so way beyond little Tracy. And the way that I met you was I reached out to your husband online because I had found his website, Formerly Fundy, I think was the name of it at the time. Benjamin L. Corey is a pretty well-known writer and speaker now as a progressive Christian.

And when I was kind of beginning my deconversion from fundamentalist Christianity and rethinking my faith, I found his website and I really enjoyed reading his writing. And so I reached out because you guys were in Maine. And we ended up meeting and having a couple of meals together. And I really connected with you. But how did you and Ben meet each other, Tracy?

Tracy (03:24)
Yeah, so he’s my former husband now and we met actually at one of his family members weddings. We met there and it was a small wedding. And so he was doing the photography at the time and we struck up a conversation and very quickly landed on the topic of adoption and found that we both had a desire to adopt in our future.

Ruth Perry (03:47)
So that was the primary thing that you connected over, adoption?

Tracy (03:50)
It was the primary thing we connected over and you know the the idea to care for the orphan and the stranger and you know the love your neighbor and all of those things were sort of secondary but the command to care for the orphan was really forefront at that time.

Ruth Perry (04:08)
And how long did you know each other before you got married?

Tracy (04:10)
We knew each other for two years and that, interestingly enough, that dating time, looking back now, had what one might call red flags. But for my nervous system, it felt familiar.

Ruth Perry (04:22)
How old were you and Ben married?

Tracy (04:26)
So yes, sometimes these parts are embarrassing because I was 32. And so, you know, from a logical standpoint, should have known better.

Ruth Perry (04:34)
Well, how can you? I mean, it seems to me like when I started unraveling things, it was because things weren’t working. And so a marriage is a great place to find out the way that you’ve been taught isn’t working, isn’t it?

Tracy (04:48)
Well, yes, and interestingly enough, you know, I think this is an important part of my story. It comes up later and it’s really it was a really a gift. so I had met him shortly after a breakup. I had been a good girl, you know, gone to church and done the things and followed all of the rules and spoke openly about my struggles, got in a lot of trouble when I was younger for asking too many questions, pointing out discrepancies. I was labeled rebellious, which if you know anything about the Pentecostal movement and maybe even just conservative Christians, that’s rebellious is equivalent to witch craft.

And so I had been sent to the Christian school of the church one year because I was a bad apple in a bag of good ones in my family. And the elders had instructed my, particularly my mother, that I needed to be plucked out to save the family. So lots of that kind of talk, they tried to pray demons out of me and they wouldn’t come out. And of course, that was my fault.

I had done all of the things, tried following all the rules, pondered what it would look like, how to help people see my heart and not find me to be rebellious or the villain that my heart’s desire was to love God and to be a good Christian girl. And I just didn’t get it right.

At 26, I was at a conference, a two-day conference, and with a colleague slash friend, and there was a lawyer there. She worked with him. She had a couple of shared clients with him. So we had lunch with him. We sat with him. We had lunch with him and I thought he was hilarious. And on day two in the afternoon, my heart started racing and I thought, I think he might be flirting with me. I think he might be interested.

And Christian men weren’t particularly interested in me. I was pretty bold and asked lots of questions and I didn’t come across as meek and mild and submissive. Not because I was a bully, but because I was just bold. I asked questions and that was not acceptable. So when I had this experience with him, I was like, my goodness. And I, I remember going to the ladies room. I still go to this place at the Augusta Civic Center and you know where that is.

I’ve been there like three times and I go there and I get the flutters. I remember getting up and going to the ladies room. I could still show you which one it was and looking in the mirror like to see myself. And I thought, is this real? And I’m 26 years old and lo and behold, the afternoon goes on and he asks my colleague and I if we would like to go for appetizers after at the end of the day.

And I had just started, I had already had a master’s degree, but I had just started my master’s work in clinical counseling. And I had a class on Friday afternoons via webinar. And so I declined, we declined. I said, I have class. And he’s like, just skip. And I was like, no, you know, good girl, follow the rules. Got to go to class. And he ended up calling me the following week and asking me on a date.

And I was so scared. Because I thought, my goodness, what if he’s not a Christian? What am I gonna do? But I didn’t know how to say no. I didn’t wanna hurt his feelings. And so I was like, okay, I’ll just go on one date. And then I found myself on a second date and I was worried about how to do this because he was a kind guy, I really liked him. And then I, you know, was right away clear that he was not a Christian and didn’t know what to do with that. And then, you know, a few dates led to a few dates.

And I was like, okay, well, here I am. And what do I do with this? And I thought, okay, well, I’ll try to convert him. Let me just try to convert him. So I can date him with the intention of converting him. And when that didn’t happen, five years later, he ended up moving back to his home state for a job. And I didn’t move with him because we were not married.

We were not married because we had different beliefs and he was very gracious and respectful. I would say he lives his life like I understand a Christian’s life should look like. He was kind, he cared for people, he was gracious, he was forgiving, he was loving and we weren’t of the same faith and that ultimately ended our relationship.

Ruth Perry (08:46)
Yeah.

Tracy (08:57)
And then shortly thereafter, I met Ben. During that relationship, I had many friends concerned about us being unequally yoked and that I was living in sin, that I was dating him, was an affront to God, and that I knew better. And so when I met Ben, and he was a Christian, and he was interested, it was, you know, if I was obedient, God would honor, he would bless me. And so it appeared I was being blessed for obedience.

Ruth Perry (09:23)
I just can’t get over that they tried to exorcise demons. That is some severe spiritual trauma you’ve experienced. I’m so sorry. And I bet they were calling you like a Jezebel spirit and stuff too, huh?

Tracy (09:38)
Yes, and I was on the ground. There was five or six men. I was on the ground on my belly. The carpet was blue, but I don’t think it had any padding under it. And they were like, you know, asking for the spirit of rebellion and another one to come out of me, as well as rejection, rebellion, rejection, and another one. I can’t remember.

Ruth Perry (09:56)
I have married a Pentecostal. My husband grew up Pentecostal. And so I’ve been to a of Pentecostal churches and we went to a Charismatic Church for a little while after our third child was born. so I believe there are healthy expressions of every kind of faith denomination and then there’s very unhealthy expressions. And it’s just interesting.

We should, especially a Pentecostal you would think would be living in the freedom of their salvation in Christ and living freely, but they were like shoving you into this little box or this little shape that you didn’t fit into violently. And they did so much harm to you. And it’s heartbreaking.

Tracy (10:35)
Mm-hmm. As well as the teachings of Dr. James Dobson, but we won’t get into that today.

Ruth Perry (10:41)
Yeah, yep, he was playing in my household every day too. Lots of factors. All right, so you get married to Ben. What is the early days like? What is your marriage like initially?

Tracy (10:48)
Mm-hmm. So we got married, we moved in together. He became a, some of the details become a little bit fuzzy, but in the time that we were engaged till the time of our wedding, he lost his job and became a student. So he was a student and I was in the mental health space. I was in leadership and climbing the ladder of leadership quite fast.

And it became apparent to me that I felt like we were in competition and I couldn’t understand that. And he at the time had an associate’s degree from the military and was working to finish his bachelor’s with a goal of going to seminary. And so wWithin the first six months well, gosh, it started on our honeymoon. If you really want the truth, I started thinking, this is marriage? And thinking my expectations were too high, thinking that I just needed to practice being a good wife. Like all the things just started coming right there for me.

And within the first six months of marriage, he had written to his second wife, his first wife. I gave him that she had cheated on him per his report now that she cheated when he was at boot camp. He married her right out of college. And the reason that they were married for a couple of years was because he was in the military. I no longer know if that is the truth or not.

But it gave him that marriage. as his second wife, the story of his second wife was that she actually tried to kill him. She was a nurse in the military and that she had tried to kill him. And because she did not want to live as a Christian any longer. I see why now. I don’t know if that is true either. Because what I know now is that as his third wife that as things began to end, well, as things ended, that he started to construct that I abuser and that our children were in danger. So there’s a pattern there.

But within those first six months, he had written to that wife who tried to kill him for his report and told her he regretted the divorce and that he had learned a lot from me around grief and she actually sent it to me on Facebook and we were sitting on the couch nearby when I saw it and he and I was like what is this and there ensued a physical altercation for him to get my computer away from me and at that point he blamed that he had had one too many to drink the night before.

And that had also been an issue. He would not come to bed with me because he needed time alone because he was an introvert. But that introvert time was resulting in a lot of beer cans. And I was married and for the long haul. And so I shared one thing of my concern and then he accused me of breaking our vows and not respecting him. And that resulted in a lot of me needing to be back in his good graces. Somehow it turned on me and I lost that message. He deleted it and I was never able to respond to her.

But she was gracious enough to let me know that that was what he was doing in his free time and he did blame her and say she was just doing that because she had emailed him for money and that that was her thing and so the chaos ensued and I was alone in my story.

Ruth Perry (14:02)
So right off the bat, honeymoon, wow. I mean, that is the typical story when you’re married to an abuser, that just, the mask falls away. The energy that they were putting into keeping that mask on during the courtship and the dating and engagement and all of that, at some point, if they’re a person with a maladaptive personality type, they were exerting a lot of energy to hide that. And so it just goes away.

Tracy (14:29)
Well, when we dated for the couple of years, there were a couple of breakups. I had broken up with him initially, which ended up getting back together. And he broke up with me because I wasn’t Christian enough. And I cannot remember the Scriptures that he quoted. He knew the Bible inside out. And so there was never going to be a day where I could sort of keep up with him or out argue him on a Scripture. And that was really him tapping into the spiritual abuse.

And it’s when he started to identify suddenly he had grown up in a cult. Surprising family members. He did not grow up in a cult, but suddenly taking my experiences and becoming his own. And that was what he was leaning into to hook me, that shame of I wasn’t enough, I wasn’t Christian enough, right? The very things that I had been trauma bonded with the church around for my lack of faith or my too many questions or my inability to release demons became the very tool that he used to then further hook me in to being with him.

Ruth Perry (15:26)
So how long had you been married when you started pursuing adoption together?

Tracy (15:30)
So, well, despite that incident, and I was married and there was an apology and the number of other things, we ended up moving after nine months to Massachusetts for him to go get his M.Div. That was the original plan. And so the plan was to adopt at some point and then he really became eager about that and to say, you know, if we were going to adopt, why do we have to have biological children first?

And so I started researching the countries of how long you needed to be married and where you could adopt and what their criteria was. So during that adoption process, you have to answer a litany of questions and I really struggled with those questions in the home study and I asked him, how do I answer these questions? It feels like I’m lying. And I don’t want to lie. And there was a lot of contortion around that and reasons why it wasn’t that I was lying. It was that I had been mean or I had been prickly or I had been

Ruth Perry (16:25)
I don’t want to skip anything up until this point. Are tracking your story well, Tracy?

Tracy (16:28)
Yeah, we’re tracking the story. Yeah, we moved to Massachusetts. He started seminary. He started coming in. I remember him coming in one night from class. I was in the shower and he came in and he started asking me what I believed about you know, this or that. And I just told him that I believed option A and he’s like, why? And I was like, because, and he’s like, well, why not B? And I, you know, I shared and he’s like, well, you can’t, you can’t cherry pick. And I was like, well, I guess I am. And he’s like, you can’t do that. And I was like, well, I am. And those kinds of sort of putting my feet in the ground and not being swayed. I didn’t realize that at that point in time, but those were just things that were stacking up against me for later.

Ruth Perry (17:14)
He was keeping a record of wrongs, huh?

Tracy (17:17)
Yes!

Ruth Perry (17:17)
Yeah, all of this story is not love. This is not what love does.

Tracy (17:22)
No, but the nervous system recognizes the chaos and the not enough and the coming back and the trying, right? This is what I tried to do with God, right? Show God that I was enough, that I did wanna be a Christian, that I did wanna follow his ways. so this nervous system activity, what I know now, looking back like, yeah, right? It’s like that love bombing and that making up and then that like always going after to please. I was well conditioned to be a pleaser even though I was bold and vocal, I was well conditioned as a pleaser.

Ruth Perry (17:56)
And I’m kind of curious how your education to become a clinical counselor, was there any kind of dissonance in yourself as you’re learning about how the brain functions and emotions and everything? Were you really keying in at all yet on how your background was malformative in those areas?

Tracy (18:17)
It’s interesting. I did clinical counseling in education. And so I was already a clinician when I met and married him. But the focus of the clinical work is what does it mean to be a clinician and learning a lot about the process and the ethics and practicing counseling skills. It’s very little on diagnosis and treatment. In fact, you take one class and it’s more focused on at the time, giving away my age, Axis I, right? Anxiety, depression, some of the the bipolar, you know, but the Axis II, which is really where back back in the day, that’s what it was called. That’s where the personality disorders lived was not really, it was sort of like glossed over.

So it wasn’t anything that I had on my radar in terms of I had worked in hospitals with sociopaths and it didn’t look exactly the same and also that dissonance for me of what it meant to be with somebody who was constantly telling me my reality wasn’t real, that I was confused, that didn’t happen. You were misremembering. Those became lines that were on repeat.

And sometimes you’re lying or you lied. And I didn’t identify as a liar. And so there was a lot of trying to recall situations and give the benefit of doubt of what was my part. Always what was my part? How could it have been misinterpreted? How could it have been interpreted? What could I have done better?

But I wasn’t on the wavelength until actually Ruth, until we were divorced or in the divorce process when I went to a therapist and she was an older woman. She probably could have been my mom and I was sharing some of what was happening for me in In those moments, in those days and she leaned forward and she said, may I? And she put her hands on my knees and she said, I’m not here to diagnose anybody. I cannot diagnose anybody that I don’t see that is not my patient. But what I can tell you is what I’m witnessing right now in your story is aligned with narcissistic abuse. And it’s of the rather severe kind. And I just burst into tears because it was the first time those words had been used. And I knew it was true.

Ruth Perry (20:48)
And you’re exactly the type of person that a narcissist is attracted to because you’re nurturing and caring and you would take ownership of your own part and question your own ownership of problems and want to do better and be better. And you’re such an overachiever and such an amazing person. And narcissism is kind of like leeching off of that.

Tracy (21:11)
You know, family members stopped reading his blog because they said, that’s not him, that’s what Tracy would say. Or he’s just, you know, lifting up Tracy’s words and taking credit for it and they felt anger. But of course I was on the Ben train trying to support him, encouraging him. Another interesting piece that I lived with in that marriage was that another way that he had used to control me was suicide. So he had experienced a family member’s completed suicide when he was 17 and had done his research. And so anytime something wasn’t going as he desired, he would say, I need space. I’m not feeling safe or I’m feeling suicidal.

You know, I grew up with forgive and forget, forgiveness, forgiveness, forgiveness. I did not grow up with forgiveness being two separate things. First you forgive and then you assess if reconciliation can occur. I learned that when I started doing my grief work around you know, wow, that’s what happened. It wasn’t forgiveness and reconciliation, it’s forgiveness. And then there’s a choice around reconciliation.

So there was never opportunity for reconciliation because I was always put on the back burner or he needed a break or he needed space and it was often indefinite with a looming suicide worry hanging over. And of course I was a clinician and you believe people. And so he was always just this side of an attempt per his words.

Ruth Perry (22:38)
So when he started to leave fundamentalism and embrace a more open and loving faith, did his life transform in loving and beautiful ways, Tracy?

Tracy (22:49)
Interesting enough, when the breakup happened, we had been about an hour away and we were, think we’d gone on a nature walk or something. And something was said about being a fundamentalist. And I was like, I am not a fundamentalist. I am not a fundamentalist. I am not. I was not giving. I said, bring me home. I was like, no, bring me home. I was clear I was not going down that, because that word for me had a very strong connotation.

And we ended up chatting later, because fundamentalism didn’t mean that. Who knows now, right? But the conversation became, we had different definitions of what fundamentalism meant. This is what I meant. Okay, so we ended up getting back together. See red flags in hindsight potentially.

Well, let me back up for a minute, because you had asked me about about school when I was in school. I had come a long way from you know, I had left the religious organization I grew up in at like 16. And although I left the church, obviously a lot of those beliefs were just in me and I didn’t recognize which ones were which.

So we went to seminary, you know, he would have just taken like every class and it was very kind of disorganized. So I’m very organized and offered to help. And I said, Biblical Global Justice, this man needs this class. He was racist and he was deep in the patriarchy. And so he took the class and it was life changing for him.

But much like anything, when he would change, he’d go from here, whoop, way over here. And in that process, what I came to learn, a lot of what I learned about his own process came from me reading his blog later. I wasn’t allowed to comment on his blog. I wasn’t allowed to interact with any of his followers. But I would find out things and eventually said to him like, Hey, before you tell the world, can you, can you tell me? Like, can we talk about some of these things that you’re sharing? Like they include me or the family. I’d like to have some consent and he said, well, I’m a writer and this is my creative authority. And I was like, I understand, but if you’re going to talk about us in there, I’d like to have a level of comfort and awareness and consent.

That didn’t go over well. So what that did was just sort of when he moved away from fundamentalism into progressivism, what I learned very quickly was that there was fundamental progressives. You probably encountered that too. Yeah. And so I did not swing with him that way. My thing was more about love God, love your neighbor, care for the poor, the sick, the stranger. That had become my faith. I left kind of everything else behind. I didn’t really care about any of the rules. I didn’t care about if you were a pacifist or a Calvinist or any of those, all those things like that. It didn’t matter to me. It was like, if I spend the rest of my life loving others, my plate’s full. I don’t need to decide on any of this other stuff because it’s hurt, hurtful, harmful and divisive, quite frankly.

So that became the place where, he was interacting with other people and making friends with Matthew Paul Turner’s and those people became their circle. And those people were individual in nature. They didn’t include their spouses. So it didn’t look odd that I was kind of very on the outskirts.

Ruth Perry (26:18)
What would happen if you did comment or interact with his works?

Tracy (26:22)
So I didn’t I didn’t interact because by that point I was just you know I was looking for ways to keep peace. Sometimes I would read it and be like hey there’s a typo. But you know I was I was thinking okay. I’m just being respectful. This is his work. I Always felt like he didn’t want me to be known he didn’t want me to take the spotlight from him.

In fact, we were first married that first year, he was doing photography and I was his second photographer. And he stopped having me as his second photographer because his clients loved me. We’d leave every wedding and he would just be stone cold silent. And I was like, what did I do? What did I do wrong? And I could never get an answer. He would just say, you know what you did.

And I was like, I thought that went well. I was helping to, you know, the wedding parties after the wedding, everybody’s happy and everybody’s going their own way. And I’m corralling people and people appreciated that, especially brides really appreciated that I was thinking of them and the details. But it took the limelight off him. And in hindsight, I realized that. But he ended up in Massachusetts, hiring a seminarian friends that he met, his wife. And that is actually how I found out I was getting divorced.

I was actually in our room and he always had his computer. Everything was always locked down. For some reason he had left that day and I was picking up the floor and his his sound was on very loud and he got a ping and the sound went off and the computer lit up and it was Amanda and she and I just kind of turned naturally and looked and I saw that it was Amanda so I looked and he had said I’m actually getting divorced as well. So I was like, okay, all right. And she had written, I’m so sorry to hear that. And I just kept it to myself.

Ruth Perry (28:03)
How long were you married?

Tracy (28:04)
Well, we were married and living in the same space for 10 years. We were, by the time we got divorced, it was more like 14. And a month after we got divorced, he moved on the next street over. A month after our divorce, our daughter’s senior year, using his veteran status and her disabilities as a way to sway the the homeowners to sell the home to him because he was a disabled vet and she needed to be close to walk between parents.

Ruth Perry (28:33)
What do you want to share about your adoption journey, Tracy?

Tracy (28:36)
Yeah, that’s a story. I’ve always struggled with sharing that story because it involves my daughters and their consent. But we adopted older children. It was difficult from the get-go.

The truth is that he wanted to leave our oldest in country, but the country said you’ve got to take both of them. She ended up having some significant issues that they did not disclose. And he really attached to the idea of our youngest. He had targeted her from photos. In fact, I remember him saying she’s going to be my little girl. And I remember when he said that I was like, they’re both going to be your girls.

And so our youngest had a lot of needs, a lot of needs, way more than I would have ever imagined. And I spent years doing tests and advocacy and therapies and treatments and behaviors and he was present. But I did the mornings, I did the nights, I did the appointments, I did the advocacy. IEP meetings were really hard. If you know anybody or have ever been a parent with a child with an IEP, the school really has a responsibility to follow very basic needs and her needs were significant, which left me in the position of having to really kind of lobby and advocate hard. Not just for, well, you typically give speech one time a week, like, no, no, no. Like she needs speech three times a week for 30 minutes and here’s why, and here’s why an outsider evaluator.

And the way that an IEP is supposed to work is that you’re supposed to vote. And so for the very nature, I needed him to come with me for numbers purposes. And after every single IEP, we’d have a fight. And he would tell me, I don’t know why you have to fight. I don’t know why you have to do this. And I was like, because we gotta give her the best fighting chance in life. And I understand this process. I did this for other kids before I met you.

But they were too long, the meetings were too long, and they took his time, and he didn’t like it. He also did not use his own voice there, he just sat there quietly. And at one point I had asked him, this is so much to study the law and to understand the nuances and to the diagnoses, could you help me? And he had said, no, we can’t both be tied up doing this, somebody has to work. Thank you very much. Somebody has to work.

Ruth Perry (30:49)
So I was just listening to the Mel Robbins podcast this morning and she was talking to a divorce lawyer and I was really surprised that he said the vast majority of divorces are easy and amicable and that when you have a challenging divorce it’s because there’s someone in the process with malintent. Would you say that your divorce has been easy or difficult Tracy?

Tracy (31:14)
Well, I’ll say this. I was what is considered a protective parent. I advocated hard. And what I’ll say to you is we waited till she was 18 to get divorced. I walked away with absolutely nothing. I never saw one red cent of any of his book monies. He had royalties that came in. He had a big chunk for his second book that came in. He had that in separate accounts. I never saw any of that money, but I walked away with nothing, none of his military retirement or disability. I walked away with absolutely zero, nada, nothing. Because she was 18 and I just needed it to just be over and I needed to not be accused.

Now, having said that, I learned a couple years ago that my daughters believe I’m living in his home and that it’s a home he bought, which is not true. But what’s classic in divorce is post-separation abuse. I didn’t know about this. But it’s where the abuser takes you back to court for frivolous things because they’re now out.

When he has a supply, when he’s had a girlfriend, had a girlfriend when we were separating. It was his, he had, he, was a student, but she was his, the person he interviewed for a big part of his doctoral work and I found out from my daughter that she helped him graduate seminary and finish his second book. She said, mom, weren’t you married? And I said, yes, yes, we were married. She said, isn’t that wrong? And I said, yes, that’s wrong. But I knew when we went out to California for his, for his graduation and I kept saying we should, we should have dinner with her or whatever. And he’s like, no big deal. Was not biting on it. And then at his graduation, I basically did a photo shoot and he didn’t ask me to be in one photo.

And then it was a couple months later where I saw that to Amanda. So I started putting, you obviously pieces to the puzzle together. So when he had her, it was okay because he had a supply. But when they broke up or he wasn’t dating, that post-separation abuse really, it’s the control and it’s the using the children. And although our youngest was by age, not an adult, emotionally, mentally about six was still a child. So he had that child attachment. So even though she was 18, she was still going back and forth and there was some communication and I cut that off finally. I just couldn’t do it and that had its ramifications and when all that sort of started to go away he really, he took me to court for the house.

But he lied on the court paper saying he was a veteran with no housing. He had a house in my backyard. Like really blatant things. During that time, he moved my daughter’s, she was in a special program at a college for people like her. And I’m trying to stay vague for her purposes of respect. And he had moved, he had forged her name and moved money from an account, the account that she was managing for school to his own, telling her that I was stealing her money and that he was doing to protect her, but he forged her name. He’s committing crimes.

And so many things were happening and then took me back to court again for the house. That time he took me to court with a lawyer and the paperwork said that I could or didn’t have to attend. So I was like, I’m not attending. And he still lost that case. And it came back to me, know, so he had paid a lawyer and he still lost the case. In fact, the house is mine and I paid for it. And we did get an initial loan under his veteran stuff. But that was all worked out.

So the post separation abuse has been terrible and the worst part happened about a year and a half ago. Really maybe two years ago when my daughter came home from his house crying. And she very clearly said, she ran in my door and I was like, what are you doing here? What’s the matter? She’s like, I can’t do this anymore. I can’t live in my father’s fantasy land. And I was like, okay, well what happened? And I followed the parenting rules to, you know, don’t talk bad about the other parent. You always encourage them. And hindsight is 20-20. What I since learned once I realized what was happening and my reality was that.

You have to be honest with kids when bad things, maladaptive things are happening. You have to point them to truth. I did engage in bring her to counselors and tell other people the stories, but it’s so disorienting for somebody like myself. I can only imagine what it’s like for one a child and then a person with pretty significant disabilities.

So I sent her right to her counselor and he worked with her and she would tell him things. And one of the things was she was very concerned about his suicidality and he would tell her. And that was concerning and the therapist told her that that was not for her and that’s not something he should be telling her.

And then eventually she started to talk to him. She came home and I didn’t realize. During that time he had sent me a suicide letter, a very gruesome, very detailed, blaming me, accusing me, telling me very few people and that I had the power over her to change her in one second. And it just went on and on and I sent the email to my sister and I was like, this is a suicide letter and it has intent and it has a plan and I’m not gonna respond to him, right? I hadn’t been responding to him and I wasn’t going to use a suicide letter as an attempt. So she called the police and the police went and checked on him.

And they let my sister know. We checked on him. We did a well-being check and he’s fine. And she said, you need to read this letter and then tell me he’s fine. And so she emailed it to the officer and they made him go to the hospital. And I was like, I am in for it. This is not gonna go well for me. But I couldn’t sit on a suicide letter in my email box. And he was saying basically the blood is gonna be on your hands.

And so I knew I was in trouble. I knew. And sure enough, it didn’t take long when she came home from her program in May and she saw him for his birthday. She said, my dad wants to see me. And I said, sometimes when people are reconciling, they’ll say, well, I’ll go to dinner, and I’ll do it in public. And so I was trying to give her tools, encourage that relationship. And.

Long story short, he started having her over there more and I was trying to get her some work and I was always the one that was sort of like the heavy hand. You’ve got to go see Voc Rehab. You’ve got to do this. You know, was kind of dragging her along. He was always blaming, you know, well, they didn’t do this and they didn’t do that. No, we’ve got to help her set her up for success as an independent adult.

And what really happened was that he became the easier parent. He also became the parent where it’s common for kids to side with the abusive parent is really what it’s called under this behavior because they’re fearful for that parent and they turn on the what’s called protective parent. And that’s exactly what happened. And he wrote a four page accusation against me.

And she was angry at me for making her go to Roke Rehab. She left my house on foot and I was calling to her and I explained to her, you’re an adult and you get to make adult choices, but you have to be responsible for those choices and you can’t just move, you know, move back and forth between mom and dad’s house. If you move to dad’s house, you’re going to move to dad’s house. You don’t just get to get back when you’re upset with dad. Right. That’s your choice. But if you go, you’re going to go. And that day she’s like, I’m moving out with my father. And I was like, OK, but that will be your final choice. There’s no coming back. I could not do that with him.

So she went over. And I decided to… She had been very foul, her language. She spoke to me like she’d never spoken to me before. And I decided I’m going to get in my car and follow her. And I did over to her father’s house to see her there and he wrote in, sorry this is so hard to tell. He wrote in the report that she was afraid I was going to kill her.

He wrote a very long four page, this is a girl who can’t write a two sentence text. And so you had a very elaborate four page, Mr. Writer, a four page complaint. The fourth page, by the way, was well outlined as a diagnosis for post-traumatic stress disorder. And all she had to tell the court was that she was afraid I was gonna kill her with my car.

And I said, yes, I followed her. And the court definition of protection from abuse is if someone fears of bodily harm. And because if I had had guardianship of her and followed her, that would have been OK. But because she was an adult with a disability, who I managed all aspects of her life, it didn’t matter. And then they gave her an opportunity to choose how long and the longest being two years And she chose two years. She doesn’t have a concept of two weeks and there it is, two years, in around the two years.

My heart has had to say it’s, you have a funeral for a living person, living people, my children. I had seen that he had been working on our older daughter for a long time. That relationship I helped to mend. Lots of lies. And so when I would talk to her, I would be very careful, very careful because everything was going back. So it’s hard to have a relationship.

The same thing with my youngest. I see now based on the things she would say, she would say, my dad says you abused me. Why does my dad say that? And I would say, well, what did you tell him? And then in the summer when she had taken some space from him because he was trying to adopt his step sister’s daughter who was an adult and he was trying to get my daughter to help him tell her, you should let my dad adopt you. And she just thought that was, she just couldn’t do it.

So when that all happened, she would say like my dad told me this family member was scary and my dad told me. So now when I look back, I wasn’t the first person, I was actually the last person he turned. So she lost, not only is she an orphan once, his actions have caused her to lose a second, like whole family. And when she was not wanting to talk to her dad because he was demanding things and telling her things and continuing to tell her, I’m not the one who abuses you. She was, you know, open with trying to relate with his family, but they wouldn’t see her without him. They were, you know, and that was not the case. You know, like nobody’s protecting me.

Her speech therapist, said to her, know, hey, are you going to be here? Are you going to be your mom or your dad’s on Wednesday or whatever? And she said, I’m not going to be at my mom’s. she said, oh, why? And the therapist was asking because she would miss sessions when she was at her father’s and she was always consistent when she was with me. At 22, she was still in speech three times a week. That tells you the level of disability that I was advocating for and managing.

She said, I’m not gonna be at my mother’s house for a long time, she’s an abuser. And the speech therapist was aghast and said her name and she said, what are you talking about? She’s like, you love your mother. And that was the last time she ever went to speech. He pulled her from speech just like that. And the speech therapist kept saying, I don’t know, this must be just a teenage thing. She’s like, she has always just loved you. She’s been frustrated with her dad. Just hold on, just give her a week. And I was like, no. And she kept checking in six months later and she was like, I feel so bad. She lost her services. She’s like, was so shocked.

Many people have said the same thing, I deferred my hope for other people to hold that. But as far as I hope, I will probably never see my children unless he dies.

Ruth Perry (42:14)
It is so heartbreaking and as a mom, I just can’t imagine what you’ve gone through and I am so sorry, Tracy. I’m so sorry.

Tracy (42:22)
Thanks. Thanks. It’s important from a grief perspective. I do, you for 20 plus years, although I left the mental health world and I’m in leadership coaching and I do lots of change management and high level leaders. I have a specialty in grief and I sit with lots of leaders in grief, right? We grieve more than 40 things in life.

And that’s been a really difficult thing to reconcile because how you move through grief when somebody is alive and you’re constantly feeling, it doesn’t end, the grief doesn’t It’s been hard to know how to navigate through grief, to live grief and to be in the isolation that is grief.

Ruth Perry (42:59)
When you Google Benjamin L. Corey, you learn that he is a writer known for his view about nonviolence. But the story that you’ve told me is about severe violence against you and against his daughters and his other family members and former relationships. I mean, it is just inconceivable what a double life that is and how dishonest that is. And it’s heartbreaking and it’s not an uncommon story. I read an anonymous Substack a couple of weeks ago about someone talking about a man in the progressive Christian faith who really scared her in advances towards her that she wasn’t expecting. She was looking at him as a safe person that she looked up to. And then there’s a story of Tony Jones and his separation from Julie McMahon and the progressive world just swarming to protect the abuser.

Tracy (43:59)
Yes, yes, yes, that happened here.

Ruth Perry (44:02)
You can relate to that story, Tracy?

Tracy (44:04)
In fact, I have a story about that. When Julie’s story first broke, his first response was, can you believe it? And total disbelief, my thing was, people don’t make up stories like that, right? And there’s a risk. But it was then that I realized I was in trouble. I still wasn’t identifying as someone who was being abused because that was cognitive dissonance for me. But I remember him, the antics that he played and the storyline that he chose and of course he believed the abuser. But also he let me know all the people that he had on his side, that nobody would ever believe me. Noted, duly noted.

Ruth Perry (44:52)
I’ve always believed you, just from knowing you both personally and him for a very short period of time, but just feeling like when I met you and met Ben, I connected with you as an in-person relationship. It was genuine and authentic and sincere. And you do have a faith that is really beautiful and does show the fruit of the spirit.

And I just want to let you know, Tracy, I believe you and I’m very, very heartbroken and sorry for you that this is what your wild and precious life has had to experience. I thank God that justice rolls down one day, that, you know, we all have to face up to what we’ve done with our life. And what you’ve done with your life is love people and care for people and advocate for people and go out of your way and sacrifice. And you have a beautiful Christianity that I look up to, Tracy, and a beautiful life and you’re just a beautiful person. And I hope that if people need a leadership coach or a grief coach that they’ll reach out to you. How can they get in touch with you, Tracy?

Tracy (46:03)
Yes, while I’m doing a relaunch, tracy at tracydowning.com is my email. And you know, my reason really for sharing this story and there was, we went off on some tangents and we didn’t circle back. But my reason for, you know, when we chatted for sharing this was that if my story helps one person feel less alone, then I have served well in the world that we live in of injustice and silence in the face of injustice, that my story being my own and if somebody else is to feel as isolated and as alone as I have, sharing my story means they feel a little less alone than I’ve done that. So tracy at tracydowning.com is the best way to reach me. You know, grief is more than death, it’s religious abuse and it’s the normal and natural reaction to loss or change of any kind. And I sit with people in grief from a professional and personal experience.

Ruth Perry (46:59)
Thank you so much for sharing your story here today, Tracy. God bless you.

Tracy (47:03)
Thank you, God bless you too.


Thanks for being here for this important conversation. Believe survivors.
You can Subscribe to The Beautiful Kingdom Builders Podcast on YouTubeSpotifyApple PodcastsAmazon MusicSubstack, and more! If you find our conversation helpful, please share it with a friend, rate and review, and subscribe so you never miss an episode!