Tag Archives: abuse

024 I Dorothy Littell Greco: For the Love of Women, Uprooting and Healing Misogyny in America

Welcome back to The Beautiful Kingdom Builders Podcast for Season Two!!! I have incredible conversations in store for The Beautiful Kingdom Builders audience, and cannot wait to share each episode with you this fall.

In this season opener, I am thrilled to share my conversation with Dorothy Littell Greco about her book ‘For the Love of Women,’ exploring misogyny’s systemic presence in society and the church. She shares personal stories, biblical perspectives, and practical steps towards healing and empowering women within Christian communities.

As Christians, we are called to love our neighbors as we love ourselves. Misogyny is ultimately a failure to love women. Addressing Christian misogyny is essential for faith communities.

You can learn more about Greco and her work on her website,
and follow her on Facebook and Instagram and Substack. Her book is essential reading
for anyone who purports to love women.

Please enjoy this episode of The Beautiful Kingdom Builders podcast on YouTubeSpotifyApple PodcastsAmazon MusicSubstack, and more

TRANSCRIPT:

Ruth Perry (00:15)
My guest today is Dorothy Littell Greco, who wrote the amazing book, For the Love of Women, Uprooting and Healing Misogyny in America, which I devoured. My copy looks like it’s been through the wringer because I was twisting it all sorts of ways so that I could write and take notes and I just loved

Dorothy Greco (00:32)
That’s great.

Ruth Perry (00:32)
it so much. It really spoke to me. I know that women who read it will really speak to them because we know this and I hope that men will take the time to read it as well and really engage with the subject matter because it really matters that Christians love our women and girls and care for them really well. And so just to start off, what compelled you to write this book and how has your own spiritual journey shaped the tone and vision of this book, Dorothy?

Dorothy Greco (00:58)
It does. Yeah, so I have, since the time that I can remember as a three to four year old little girl have not been sort of the typical feminine little girl. Like I wasn’t into Barbies. I wasn’t really into dress ups. I really loved to be off in the woods, exploring, investigating. I love sports. I started competitive sports when I was five, if you can believe that, and played Division 1 college field hockey all the way through all four years.

And then after graduation, I found myself in a very male-dominated field. I worked as a photojournalist primarily doing professional sports. So it was often me and maybe two or three other women sitting around the court of Boston Celtics while there were 20 or 30 men, or at football games or baseball games. So I had to figure out what does it mean to be a woman?

I was never sad or grieved that I was a woman, but…What does it mean to be a woman and to exist as a woman in a world that is dominated by so many men and often led poorly by those men? When I became a Christian in college, I think it was really disorienting to me because my initial time in church or parachurch organizations, they were more complementarian, meaning that there were very defined gender roles for men and for women.

And so here I was someone who felt a great deal of agency and autonomy and then was being told like actually you have to really get smaller and submit yourself to the men in your life. I, you know, there weren’t any men in my life at that time as a single woman. So I had to work out like how does the gospel really, what does it mean to me? What does it mean to be a woman? What does it mean to walk in my gifts?

So there was all that personal stuff. And then coming into the last probably 10 years in American culture, it just feels like there’s a misogyny epidemic. There’s so many examples of the ways that misogyny is playing out. Everything from the abuse of the American gymnasts by Dr. Larry Nasser to the women who have been abused within the Southern Baptist denomination. The ways that the current president is maligning women publicly, calling reporters piggies and I won’t say the word because I don’t know whether that’ll get us in trouble, but witches with a different first letter.

And I thought this can’t be what it’s supposed to be like. This can’t be what it’s supposed to be like, particularly for those of us who are following Jesus. So I felt like there was an invitation in a sense from God. It wasn’t like an audible invite with a here’s an RSVP, but there was a sense of the Lord drawing me in and saying, I think that you have something to say here and would you like to partner with me in writing this book because I think you could do it. So it really was just saying yes to that inspiration and that invitation and wanting to speak into the ways that I think that women are devalued and not loved, in the ways that I think that the Lord would have them be valued in love.

Ruth Perry (03:50)
Can you share what your definition of misogyny is that you start your book out with?

Dorothy Greco (03:55)
Yeah, I felt like I needed to stretch out the book definition and the definition that, you know, we can find in the dictionary is simply the hatred of women. And that feels way too narrow because it’s easy for men to say, well, I love my wife or I love my daughters. I love my mom. I love my sisters. Therefore, misogyny, this conversation about misogyny doesn’t apply to me and then just move on. And that just feels way too easy.

So I wanted to be able to define it in a way that stretches it out and makes us more aware of the systemic nature of misogyny because it’s not just an individual thing. There are systems that keep it in place. So this is how I define it in the book. Misogyny is a persistent, insidious belief that men’s ideas, wants, needs, and experiences are more important than women’s, and that legal, religious, and social systems, as well as intimate relationships, should uphold this principle. This belief system subsequently influences the laws, policies, practices, and ethos of a given culture.

Ruth Perry (04:50)
Yeah, that’s so good. And you emphasize that this isn’t just a women’s issue. That misogyny is also a men’s issue. Why should men care deeply about this?

Dorothy Greco (05:00)
Yeah, I think that they should care about it on several fronts. One is misogyny harms them too. You know, I’m the mom of three sons and there were so many times when we’re in a public setting or in a church religious setting and all of our kids were very emotionally attuned. Both my husband and I think of a pretty high emotional intelligence. So obviously that was important that we teach that to our kids. And there were situations where you know, our son would be crying about something that was legitimate. And somebody would say, stop crying, boys don’t cry.

So that kind of constraining of male emotions, in particular, vulnerable emotions, emotions that are around hurt or pain or sadness, really makes their emotional palette quite narrow. And oftentimes then the feelings come out as anger, like because that’s the only acceptable emotion in American culture for men, they can be angry and they can be really angry, but they can’t cry. So we think that there’s that component which really harms men. But also being in relationships where there’s equality rather than hierarchy is just better for everybody because if it’s a hierarchical relationship then the one on top always has to be exerting energy to control the person underneath of him.

While that clearly has some payoff, some benefits to it, in the long run, it’s exhausting. And there’s a lack of true intimacy that happens in those kind of relationships. So I think for those very personal reasons, men need to care about misogyny. And for those men for whom they would say that they are followers of Jesus, it’s pretty clear in scripture that they are called to love women and that they’re called to serve, they’re called to treat others with kindness and with dignity and with compassion. So there’s that, larger, I think, ask that scripture makes of us.

Ruth Perry (06:47)
Yeah, and I also think what happened at the fall was that we became disconnected from that intimate relationship that we had with God and with each other, and that we all do better when we all do better. I think our culture is so independent and individualistic that we can think that we can be an island of one. But we really do depend on each other and need each other and when we care for each other and we are all doing well, we all do better.

Dorothy Greco (07:15)
Yeah, the goal should be mutual flourishing, like organizing our lives, organizing the world, organizing our churches so that we’re paying attention and helping everyone to flourish rather than just the people at the top.

Ruth Perry (07:27)
How does misogyny intersect with power and nationalism and then the fear that we see in public discourse today?

Dorothy Greco (07:33)
Yeah, that’s a big topic and we could spend an entire hour just talking about that. Lots of people have written about that. I haven’t written a whole lot about it, but I do talk some of it, about some of it in the book. think in David Fitch has a great book, Reckoning with Power, and he talks about two kinds of power, worldly power and godly power. And the former, worldly power, is finite. It’s very prone to abuse. It’s exerted over top of others.

And godly power is infinite and it is never used to force or to coerce or to manipulate anyone. So if men are relying on worldly power, and it is mostly men, not only, but mostly men, are relying on worldly power to get what they want, to influence, to coerce, to control, to manipulate, to be in charge, there is a limited amount of that kind of power and they fear losing it.

And I think that’s why we see the fear flare up like what happened in Washington on January 6th. Those folks were afraid that they were going to lose their power, their connection to power. So they abused their power in an attempt to protect their status. In my opinion, nationalism is a lot about fear, fear and pride, like the sense that we are better than other people. White folks are better than other people.

So there’s a fear of losing the majority, a fear of not having the kind of privileges that they’ve had. And that obviously plays out within the church, it plays out within marriages, it plays out through misogynistic systems where one person is afraid that they will lose control and so then they double down to try to make sure that they can get what they want.

Ruth Perry (09:08)
Yeah, that really resonated with me when you talked about worldly power versus Godly power. So then you systematically break down and with great research show how misogyny is present in so many aspects of our life from healthcare to the workplace to government, media and entertainment, sexual relationships and in the church.

As I was reading that first chapter about healthcare, I mean, I could spend an hour just telling you different ways that I’ve experienced misogyny in healthcare. And most recently, in October, I was bit by a black widow spider three times. And I felt it bite me. I had red welts where it happened. And I went to my local doctor’s office and showed the bites and said, I was bitten by something. I didn’t see the spider, so I didn’t know what it was and she told me I was having a panic attack. It took my body nine days to get all that venom out and I was in excruciating pain. But she just saw a woman, and I told her I’m in excruciating pain, and she told me I was having a panic attack.

Dorothy Greco (10:06)
Wow, wow, I’m so sorry. I’m sorry to say that that is not uncommon. That kind of treatment is not uncommon.

Ruth Perry (10:10)
But I thought it was particularly important that we talk about how misogyny in healthcare especially affects women of color and poor women and marginalized women. Could you share some of that?

Dorothy Greco (10:21)
Yeah, the word that’s often used here is intersectionality. both misogyny and racism sort of overlap each other in this space. Women of color are often seen in our culture as less than, as not credible witnesses, even to their own lives and their own experiences. So when they come into the ER, for instance, they’re more likely to be ignored or mistreated.

And I could share multiple stories that friends have shared with me, women of color, but it’s not simply anecdotal. Like there are stats that back this up. And I’ll just share a couple: that the US has one of the highest maternal mortality rates among all industrialized wealthy nations. Three women die every day of causes that could be avoided just here in the US. That’s not worldwide, that’s just here. And the rate for black women is three times higher than for white women.

Black women are more likely to be refused pain medication when they need it because there’s this appalling myth that somehow they should be able to endure more pain than white women. Black women over the age of 55 are twice as likely as white women to develop diabetes and that’s a complicated issue, right? There’s genetics, there’s the ways that poverty factors in and there’s not as much good food oftentimes for folks of color.

But then there’s often the reality that they’ll go in with symptoms, just like you did when you had your spider bite, and say, this happened to me, this is a real thing, this is an experience that I’m having. And then the response is to dismiss them, to ignore them, to tell them they’re lying even. And as a result, if you don’t treat diabetes early on, the consequences are horrifying. Loss of limbs, and even loss of life.

So yeah, there’s just so many examples of how women of color within the healthcare system in the United States get even worse treatment than other women.

Ruth Perry (12:11)
I also thought it was pretty shocking how many more studies they do and research they do into erectile dysfunction versus PMS, which affects 90 % of women and just the horrible experiences of women with endometriosis. I know a lot of my personal friends have that and how painful that is.

Dorothy Greco (12:29)
Yes, and the fact that they haven’t prioritized funding to research that. Apparently it can take between eight to 10 years to get a proper diagnosis, and then there’s no protocol for how to treat it. How is that even possible that there are so many women who suffer from this, and yet it’s not bumped up high on the list as something that needs to be studied? Yeah, it’s tragic.

Ruth Perry (12:50)
One of the more vulnerable sections of the book was about sexuality and relationships. How has misogyny distorted the way that many Christians understand intimacy and consent and mutuality? And then what would a healthy mutual honoring relationship between a man and a woman look like in a Christian perspective that would differ from that experience?

Dorothy Greco (13:09)
I opened that chapter, which I think is chapter six, with a very vulnerable verbatim story from a young couple. And he, the husband, entered the marriage still struggling with pornography. Had made progress, but it was still an issue for him. And perhaps more significantly, having been taught that once he got married and was able to have sex with his wife, that he wouldn’t have a pornography addiction anymore.

And this led to a tremendous amount of pain for his wife in particular, and ultimately for him once he began to realize the cost of his entitlement, the cost of demanding sex whenever he had the anxiety that would promote him or that would push him towards pornography use, right? Because the woman is not the answer to the problem of a pornography or any addiction. Like that goes way deeper than being able to have a sexual release.

So the entitlement that’s often part of marriages where there is misogyny is so toxic. It’s that sense that the man is more important, that his needs are more important, that he has the right to expect sex, he has the right to expect his wife to do whatever it is that he feels like he needs in that moment. That includes a lack of consent.

This goes way back to ancient English law. think it was in the 1600s that there was something called coverture that was established and then it became part of the American legal system whereby when a woman said, do, she was giving up all her rights to say no to her husband’s sexual advances. And that’s part of why it wasn’t until I think the end of the 20th century, beginning of the 21st where intramarital rape was actually a crime in all 50 states. So it’s shocking to me that that took so long for the legal system to realize that no, wives can be raped by their husbands as well.

And all of that contradicts so clearly what the gospel is all about, right? Which is not to elevate men and to diminish women, but that we are all equal before the Lord, right? That’s what Galatians 3 is talking about.

And so in a marriage where both the wife and the husband are seeking to follow Jesus, they’re gonna endeavor to create a mutual relationship. Yes, sexually, but in all facets. They’ll be asking questions like, there anything I can do to help you to flourish? Is there anything else that you need from me so that you can really thrive as opposed to the husband being the only one who matters, like his dreams, his desires are elevated over the wife.

In a marriage where there is mutuality, there is a lack of hierarchy and a lack of control, which is just so much better for everybody involved, particularly the children. When they can see that kind of equality and that kind of respect that’s going back and forth between their mothers and their fathers, then they begin to have a healthy understanding of what a marriage looks like that is a place where people flourish and where they love each other deeply.

Ruth Perry (16:01)
Your chapter on the church may be especially painful for many readers. Why do you think can become deeply entrenched in Christian spaces?

Dorothy Greco (16:09)
Yeah, and I’ll just add that that chapter was the most painful chapter for me to write. I was alternating between tears and anger as I did research for that. There is a very long, I don’t even remember how many parts it was, five, six parts, the Houston Chronicle did on the abuse that happened within the Southern Baptists. And to read through that whole series was infuriating. Just the level and the depth of abuse and the cover-ups that happened were appalling. So it was a very, very difficult chapter for me to write.

And you know, it’s very complicated, it’s multifaceted, and if we’re honest, we can say that men and women working together to lead, to pastor, serving alongside someone who sees the world very differently than you do is more work, right? That requires more compromises, more listening, more slowing down, more empathy, more kindness.

And like one of the things that I was considering, think about parenting a two to three year old. I don’t know if you have any kids, but in that timeframe, I can remember we lived in New England, that there were times when we were getting ready to go outside in the snow. And it was excruciating for me, who tends to move quickly, to wait for them to put their own boots and coats and mittens and hat on. Like I wanted to just do it. I wanted to force them into it so that we could get outside more quickly.

And I think that that’s just like a picture of how we often look at the American church. Like we’re so driven by particular metrics and the metrics. are all connected to the size, how many people are sitting in the church, what is the collection, what’s happening with the collection, how many people raised their hand to get saved.

And those sort of things, I’m not saying that they’re unimportant, but if we rush into what it means to be a Christian, if we imagine that the only thing that matters is how many people come to church or how much money is being given, then we’re not necessarily focusing on what does it mean to mature? What does it mean to become Christ-like? What does it mean to really love each other like Paul wrote about in 1 Corinthians 13?

Like all those things should be every bit as important, if not more important than how big the church is getting. So there’s that. And then there’s also the church systems, denominations, individual pastors who function as if what the Bible is saying is that men are supposed to be the leaders and women are supposed to submit. And it’s all flattened out into that, you know, sort of sound bite.

Then, you know, the Mark Driscoll’s, the Joel Webbins, the Doug Wilsons, et cetera, who believe that women, their primary goal is to support their men and to have babies. Then that really reduces and shrinks what women’s lives are to be all about. And what about the single women?

You know, what about the women who are divorced or the women who have lost their husbands? Like there’s not even an option of how they’re supposed to live their life. And then layer on top of that, the fact that scripture does talk about dying to self and being sacrificial. So if you have a, if you have men who were entitled and then a system that’s both patriarchal and misogynistic, and then teaching that elevates being sacrificial and dying to yourself, I think it’s just a fertile environment for the abuse of women and children. And so women who don’t have confidence in their own understanding of scripture, women who were raised in a high authoritarian church culture and believe that it is their role to submit, then wow, I mean, that is just a total setup for an abusive system. And that’s what we’ve seen again and again and again.

Ruth Perry (19:46)
I’m reminded, I was just recently having coffee with a friend who’s a woman evangelist and someone that she knew sat down next to us but they didn’t know each other in church relationship and so my friend said she was an evangelist but she wasn’t a feminist. She wanted to clarify that she wasn’t a feminist. She felt like God called her to that but that’s not the kind of woman she was.

And then the woman that she was speaking with started talking about how much damage militant feminists have done, really turning off men towards wanting have equal rights with women. And she was saying, that’s why men were further behind. And I just interjected, but it is a problem that the most dangerous place for a woman is in her home.

Dorothy Greco (20:29)
Yeah.

Ruth Perry (20:29)
And she was like, well, I can’t even talk about that because I have personal experience, so don’t mention that, please. And I was like, where’s the disconnect where we’d be more angry about feminists than we would be about the abuse that occurs?

Dorothy Greco (20:41)
Right, right. And that is exactly how things played out like in the Southern Baptists, where when the women started to come forward and to say, this is what happened to us, they were vilified. I mean, the people who were the men who were the head of the Southern Baptists, the things that they said about those women, they called them demonic, they called them satanic, as opposed to being horrified about what happened to them, as opposed to saying, my gosh, I’m so terribly grieved that you had that experience in our church denomination. Like that wasn’t happening. And to me, that is really telling because that’s about entitlement, that’s about worldly power, that’s about men somehow believing that their sexual needs are greater than a woman’s autonomy and a woman’s right to an existence. Like it’s so warped from what the scripture really says.

Ruth Perry (21:33)
Yeah, it seems like once you see it, it’s hard to not see it, but it’s really hard to your brain around not seeing it. Although I was there myself, so I get it. What are some misogyny waste messages that women absorb when they’re in Christian spaces?

Dorothy Greco (21:47)
Mmm, there’s a lot. So where to start?

That you don’t belong here. I think that gets communicated both verbally and non-verbally. When it’s all male-led and there’s no seats at the table for any women, that’s a pretty clear communication. That your needs don’t matter, that your gifts don’t matter, that you don’t belong here, that in God’s created order, you’re not as important, you’re secondary, and that if you want to lead or if you have an opinion that’s different from your husband or from the male pastor that you’re in sin, like all of those kind of things are so wrong, but also they so mess with women, particularly those who have callings where they should be teaching and they should be preaching and they should be leading. Yeah, it’s very damaging.

Ruth Perry (22:39)
How have patriarchal church structures impacted not just women but men and then the broader body of Christ as well?

Dorothy Greco (22:46)
Well, I think the sense that when there’s so much control and there’s so much hierarchy and there is the message that women are less than, I think that that gives men a buy for growing up. It somehow allows them to feel like, I don’t have to do the hard work of maturing and the hard work of figuring out what does it mean to be a co-equal? How do I really listen to my wife or to my daughter or to my co-leader?

And pay attention to the experiences she’s had and the things that she wants to bring to the table. It’s much easier to just try to control someone, though in the end you will be exhausted and you won’t have the kind of intimacy that I think we were created for. Like I really believe that God wants us to be known. He wants us to be fully known by the people who are trustworthy in our lives. And so if men institute the system where they’re the ones who can call the shots and the women are less than,

And if that carries over into their marriage relationships, they’re going to lose out on what true intimacy really means. You know, the men who feel like they should have the right to be able to have sex whenever they want. I can pretty much guarantee you that at least most of those wives are not enjoying their sexual relationship with their husbands. And if they were willing to give up control and if they were willing to give up entitlement, and they cared about women’s experiences.

I think women would probably enjoy their sexual relationships more, which would benefit the man, but they’re not doing that work to get that far.

Ruth Perry (24:15)
I was also curious if you could distinguish the difference between honoring scripture and weaponizing scripture. Can you talk about how that happens on this issue?

Dorothy Greco (24:24)
Yeah, and I feel like I have to be really careful of this too. You know, anytime I have the opportunity to speak or to teach, I don’t want to use that platform as a bully pulpit. I don’t want to, you know, pluck out certain sections of scripture that support my argument or my beliefs and not pay attention to the other ones.

So for me, if we look at like the full arc of scripture from the beginning in Genesis all the way to the end in Revelation, what it’s talking about is redemption. What it’s talking about is reconciliation. What it’s talking about is us really being able to love again in the way that Paul wrote about in 1 Corinthians 13. That’s what it’s all about. That’s what we’re being called to. We’re not being called to hierarchies. We’re not being called to racism. We’re not being called to Christian nationalism. We’re being called to love passionately, sacrificially in a way that is actually quite difficult.

So whenever I have conflicts with somebody about what scripture is saying, it feels really important to me to be able to be mindful of the whole. Like not just this one particular passage, but what is the whole, what is the redemptive hermeneutic of the entire scripture? And how can I apply that to whatever conversation happening? So when I consider the words of Joel Webbon or Mark Driscoll, those sort of men who I do believe weaponized scripture. I do believe that the folks in the 1800s, the American Christians who were using the scripture to defend racism, I think they were weaponizing scripture. They were taking it out of context. We know that slave owners cut sections of the scripture out so that their slaves would not have any understanding of the ways that the Bible really does speak of freedom.

It speaks of not of slavery, but of freedom and of equality. So I really don’t think that if somebody is serious about their faith, that they can use the Bible to say women are less than, women are not equal to men, or people of color are less than white folks. Like that is weaponizing scripture. And I think they’re gonna have to answer to the Lord for those choices that they’ve made.

Ruth Perry (26:30)
Amen, absolutely. If the church truly embraced the gifts and leadership and wisdom and voices of women, how do you think that it would change our witness in the world?

Dorothy Greco (26:39)
I think we’d be a lot more believable. Yeah, so my husband and I happen to be in relationship with a fair number of people who would not consider themselves to be Christians. And when we’ve had conversations about why my husband and I are, their main complaint is like, if Christianity was real, then more people would act like Christians, to which we would say, yeah, we feel the same way. So I think it’s when people take the scripture seriously, take Jesus’ call seriously, take it seriously to really be changed people, to be transformed people, to be transformed into the image of Christ. That’s when the gospel gains traction in the world.

It’s not simply the talk, it’s not simply what kind of worship you have on Sunday morning, it’s how radically are you loving people. Our little church is very connected to the local government’s foster care system. So we have an unusually high number of families who foster in our church. And to me, I don’t think I could ever do that. I don’t. I have too many control issues and not enough empathy at this point in my life. Cause it is hard.

Like we have walked with these folks and to say that is really hard work, but that’s just one of the ways that they’re seeing. I have this capacity. We have space in our house. I have space in my heart. I see that the Lord cares about these children, so what can we do? And those kind of witnesses to the truth of the gospel, to me, are very impactful.

Ruth Perry (28:09)
Well, what I really appreciate about your book is that you don’t stop at just naming the problem. You also talk about healing. What does healing from misogyny actually look like for individuals and for communities?

Dorothy Greco (28:21)
Yeah, first I think it is individual in terms of what we as women have to deal with, have to walk through if we have been harmed by misogyny. And most of us have, and there’s a spectrum from those who have been raped or repeatedly faced abuse within the context of their marriage versus other women who maybe have just had a boss who was verbally abusive or have been catcalled as they’re walking down the street.

But I think first we have to name it. We have to be willing to say this happened and then to call it for what it is rather than dismissing it or rather than simply saying, you know, that happened a long time ago, so it’s not a factor for me. As they do research, you know, we’re learning how much our bodies carry the traumas in them. It may have happened a long time ago, but our bodies still remember and our bodies know what happened to us and they carry it until we’re able to process it and it’s not move beyond it, but move through it, I guess is the best way to talk about it.

So first is reckoning with what happened, talking about what happened with trusted people, whether that’s a professional therapist or friends who have been through the similar situations who can really listen and who can be empathetic witnesses. It’s grieving. There’s a lot of grief involved. When I was writing this book, I did a lot of grieving both for myself and the ways that I’ve suffered from misogyny, but corporately as a whole, the way women have been so deeply, deeply wounded by misogyny. Paying attention to our anger.

For women in the church settings in particular, people don’t like it when we get angry. We are silenced and shushed and criticize when we express anger, but anger is really important to this process. We have to really understand what is the anger trying to teach us. So I think that that’s an important component for healing and then being willing to move towards forgiveness and that is a very organic process for each one of us.

And I don’t think it’s ever one and done. I really believe that the seven times 70 that Jesus talked about is true for all of us, that we forgive, we make the conscious choice to forgive, but then there are so many different layers that come up as we’re triggered or as we remember things that happened. And we have to then just revisit and say, okay, I guess that I have more work to do here.

And then for men, for those of us have perpetuated misogyny, it’s different for them. I think it’s really important that they acknowledge the ways that they have harmed women. And I think that that acknowledgement should be both to the woman, if it’s an individual woman, and also corporate. I really would like to see more pastors from the front saying, I have been thinking about the ways that we as a church have been maybe a little bit misogynistic and here I’m gonna name them and I want to take responsibility for that. That would really go a long way, I think, for women to feel seen and heard and for the experiences that they’ve had to be named because so often it’s denied and we then have to just think like, did that really happen? Is that what happened in that situation? But when somebody can name it and own it, I think that that really is very useful to us.

And then men being willing to say, I am going to do whatever it takes to make sure that the women in my congregation are thriving. And I want to have a conversation. I’m going to invite you women to come and have lunch with me after church for the next four weeks. And I want to hear what you have to say about the ways that you have been shut down or the ways that you have not been invited in. I’ve been going to church for 45 years and nobody has ever done that, ever, and I would love to see it. All you pastors out there, I’d love to see that.

Ruth Perry (31:59)
I think it was 12 years ago my husband and I went through a church planting assessment with Converge. And I was the only female candidate. Everyone else there was just the male was going to be the pastor and then the wife was there to support. And
Converge at the time was, you know, women could be pastors too, but they were partnering with Acts 29. And so the experience of that weekend was like, I’m the odd duck around here.

And I remember them asking me if women using their gifts in ministry was a hill that I wanted to die on. And I said no at the time. It wasn’t. That was 12 years ago. But as I’ve experienced these obstacles in me fulfilling my calling, I’ve come to realize that it absolutely is abuse when you don’t let women use their gifts, and be who they are and who God made them to be. If you’re trying to stuff them into boxes that fit your norms for your community and that’s all they can be, that is abuse as well, I believe.

Dorothy Greco (32:55)
Yes, and it can lead to religious trauma.

Ruth Perry (32:58)
Yeah, yeah. I did get some EMDR therapy recently and I realized I have religious trauma. It hadn’t occurred to me, but it was really helpful to go through that therapy.

Dorothy Greco (33:08)
Yeah, yeah, I did some EMDR last summer too as I was writing the book because there were so many things coming up for me.

Ruth Perry (33:15)
For women who have experienced harm and trauma in the church because of misogyny, what would you want them to hear the most?

Dorothy Greco (33:21)
Hmm. I think that healing is possible. It’s totally a journey and it’s gonna take work, but healing is possible and Maybe more importantly that God loves women like I believe that with all of my heart that the Lord loves women I think when we look at the ways that Jesus treated women the ways he listened to women the way he respected women the way he invited women in. The ways that he healed women. I can’t come to any other conclusion other than the fact that you know he was portraying God’s heart to women. And I really believe that if the church and if the culture treated women in those ways, that there would be just an incredible amount of healing and an incredible amount of joy that we could experience as a culture if that was in fact how we were treating women.

Ruth Perry (34:10)
How can women begin reclaiming their voices and gifts after years of being told to stay small?

Dorothy Greco (34:15)
Yeah, that’s hard work, isn’t it?

Ruth Perry (34:17)
Yeah.

Dorothy Greco (34:17)
I think that that is part of the healing journey and then being willing to start to take risks, you know, to start to push back. I think a number of years ago when our senior pastor was preaching a sermon about David and the way he phrased it was that David and Bathsheba’s affair. And I remember just in that moment thinking like, whoa, that was not an affair. An affair is consensual, an affair is mutual. And so rather than just sit on those feelings, you know, I had a conversation with him. Didn’t do it right after the sermon, because I understand how vulnerable people are when they preach, but waited a couple days and then just wrote a very thoughtful email to say, here’s some research, here’s some things that I’ve learned over the years, and I don’t think it’s really fair to call it an affair. I think that it was rape. It seems pretty clear to me that it was rape.

So taking, like finding the courage in those moments, to do just little pushbacks I think makes a difference. It gives us a sense of empowerment and voice, which is not to say that all of those conversations will go well or will be heard. But then really I think reckoning with am I in a space that is going to allow me to thrive and to flourish? And if not, is it time to think about finding a different church? Obviously that’s a much more complicated question when it’s marriage, right?

But for some women that is the story that if their partner is unwilling to listen, he’s unwilling to hear, if he’s unwilling to value, if there’s ongoing abuse, then I think that that is a question that’s worth asking is do I need to leave in order to be able to speak and in order to be able to find my voice. think Tia Leving’s book, The Well-Trained Wife and her new book as well, which is I Belong to Me, I haven’t finished that one yet, but she talks a lot about what what it’s like as a woman who is clearly super smart, very articulate, to be in a system that routinely shut her down, that routinely said she had no right to speak. And so both of her books talk about what it’s been like for her to find her voice and to journey out of those oppressive systems.

Ruth Perry (36:20)
Let me just ask a couple more questions before we close. What does the phrase, For the love of women, mean to you now, after writing and discussing this book with readers?

Dorothy Greco (36:28)
Yeah, originally the title was Love the Women. And then as we were working on both title and subtitle, was about a year and a half ago now, my main editor, Kyle, said, you know, I think that a more invitational title is for the love of women.

And I agreed with them. I thought yes, you’re right. I think that that that is a better title So I think when we consider what are the things that need to happen in order for women to feel valued respected loved in order to thrive I think it it really is about for the love of women like what can we do for the love of women? How can we change systems and cultures and churches for the love of women? So it is an invitation and I think that

This is only going to change if a lot of people are willing to come alongside of those who have these feelings and who have the level of conviction so that we can move forward. When you think back to the ways that racism had one of its falls, certainly it’s still there and we’re seeing that a lot within the Christian nationalist movement.

There was some real clear movement that happened in the 1960s. And I think that there was just like a groundswell of people who said enough, like I am just so tired of seeing this, of experiencing this. And then that collaborative effort, and there was a lot of prayer. I mean, there was a lot of prayer that happened during that time. So it has to come through a desire for transformation, both personally and corporately and there has to be a sense of it’s time. It’s time for us as a culture to stop oppressing women and to figure out what it looks like to really love them so that they can thrive and flourish.

Ruth Perry (38:13)
Yeah, I just think that’s such a profound and simple thing. But as Christians, we’re called to love God and love our neighbor as ourselves. And are you truly loving someone if you’re controlling them and dominating them and having expectations for them? Yeah. And then I think of all the one another commands throughout the New Testament. If we applied that to our relationships with women in the church, would we treat them the way that we’re treating them now?

Dorothy Greco (38:37)
Right? Right?

Ruth Perry (38:38)
If readers walk away remembering only one thing from this book, what do you hope that it is?

Dorothy Greco (38:43)
I think it just goes back to that last question is that God loves them and they are worthy of being loved. There is nothing faulty about them because they’re women. We have gotten that message again and again and again that we’re less than, that we should be smaller, that we should be quiet, that we shouldn’t get in the way. And I don’t think that that’s truthful. think honestly, if I’m really being honest, I would say that’s a lie from the pit of hell.

That’s exactly what the enemy would want. The enemy would want us to make women subservient, to make them less than, to keep them down because if women are fully themselves and fully thriving, watch out.

Ruth Perry (39:20)
Well, thank you so much. Your book is For the Love of Women by Dorothy Littell Greco. Your website is DorothyGreco.com, and where else can people find you?

Dorothy Greco (39:29)
Yeah, so Substack is a great place and I’m under What’s Faith Got to do With It. I don’t post a ton, like maybe twice a month, but really solid articles in there, sometimes excerpts, and then I’m also on Instagram.

Ruth Perry (39:43)
You have two marriage books as well, right?

Dorothy Greco (39:45)
Yeah. The first one is Making Marriage Beautiful and that was published in 2017 by David C. Cook and then Marriage in the Middle, which is really about marriage in the years of between like 40 to 70 in terms of our age, not the number of years married. And that one, I really love that book. There’s nothing like it out there. It really talks very honestly about the challenges that we face in midlife as we’re married.

Ruth Perry (40:09)
Well, I’m 45 so I’m gonna pick it up. Thank you so much for being here today talking with me, Dorothy. Let me give you the last word before we sign off.

Dorothy Greco (40:18)
Yeah, just am appreciative that you care about this and my hope is that more and more people will read the book and will share it with other folks and the conversations will snowball so that we can really make some progress on figuring out what it looks like to love women.

Ruth Perry (40:33)
It’s a really amazing book. I highly recommend it. Thank you so much. God bless.

Dorothy Greco (40:37)
Thank you.


Did you enjoy this episode? Please subscribe, rate or review us on YouTubeSpotifyApple PodcastsAmazon MusicSubstack, and more! Your support means the world. God bless!

017 I Jenai Auman on How Church Systems can Marginalize and Harm

In this insightful interview, Jenai Auman discusses her book ‘Othered: Finding belonging with the God who pursues the hurt, harmed, and marginalized.’ She shares her personal journey as the daughter of an immigrant and surviving an abusive pastor as a church staff person. She explores the impact of trauma, and offers a trauma-informed perspective on healing, belonging, and systemic change within faith communities. This is a powerful resource for the hurting as well as those who are hoping to prevent and mitigate the effects of harm in their own church communities.

We talked about all kinds of behavior health science stuff, from family systems, to power dynamics, identity and group belonging, enmeshment, intersectionality, and to person-centered therapy. Be sure to follow me on a social media platform to catch reels from our convo with some of my favorite bits! In our conversation, Jenai mentioned the work of Kimberlé Crenshaw, Carl Rogers, and Henri Tajfel. She also mentioned her friend Rohadi Nagassar’s book, When We Belong: Claiming Christianity on the Margins and Paul Kingsnorth’s book, Against the Machine. And Jenai gives a great example of slowing down to care for the person in front of you from the newest, must-see Knives Out movie: Wake Up Dead Man.

Othered by Jenai Auman – https://amzn.to/4s4wBF0
Jenai’s website: bio.site/jenaiauman
Jenai’s Substack – Othered | Jenai Auman | Substack
Jenai’s Social Media: Instagram and Facebook

Please enjoy this important conversation on YouTubeSpotifyApple PodcastsAmazon MusicSubstack, and more

TRANSCRIPT:

Ruth Perry (00:15)
My guest today is Jenai Auman, the author of Othered: Finding Belonging with the God Who Pursues the Hurt, Harmed, and Marginalized. It was a fantastic book. I’ve listened to it two times on Audible, and I have to say your voice is like made for radio. It’s like butter. It’s beautiful. I was really glad I got Audible just to hear it in your voice. Your book explores how people are othered in church systems drawing on your experiences as a biracial Filipina American and from working in a toxic ministry environment. And your book offers a trauma informed path toward healing and belonging in God. It was fantastic. So thank you so much for being on the podcast today, Jenai!

Jenai Auman (00:56)
Thank you for having me Ruth, I’m so glad to be here.

Ruth Perry (00:58)
I resonated a lot with your book. I have spiritual trauma in my background from unhealthy church system that chewed up and spit my family out and kicked us while we were down. And so in my mind, your book is extremely important for Christians to read. I think it’s a sadly common story in the culture that we’re in for some reason, American Christianity. And I think one of the critiques that a lot of people feel with a book like yours is that it’s criticizing the church and they don’t understand that it’s coming from a place of deep love for the church and wanting the church to be what God wants it to be. And so how do you feel about that, Jenai?

Jenai Auman (01:35)
Yeah. Yeah, I, listen, I was a long time, even as a kid, I was a long time people pleaser. And even as a church staff member, I was a people pleaser to a fault, detrimental to my mental health. And I think a part of my healing journey, and I think that includes like, I did a lot of, you know, my own internal work before I wrote the book, that’s what I recommend for all people, do a lot of your own internal work before you write the book. I would say that I realized that you can please people all you want, especially in a church environment, and they will still subjugate you and subject you to horrible treatment.

I do care about loving people, certainly. I don’t know if you do Enneagram. I’m an Enneagram too. But I tell people I’m a two with teeth now because I needed my teeth to help me and to protect me. I’m okay with rustling a few feathers, but that’s also because I think that is a part of what it means to be the church. So I am critiquing the church by and large. I am also a part of the church.

And so some of the critiques are critiques of what I perpetuated. Some of the critiques are systems that I was a part of that I benefited from for a while until I couldn’t see it until it hurt me. And it was hurting me for probably longer than I acknowledged. And so now I’m okay. I understand if some people don’t like the book. I still think it is a part of the conversation. It’s not the entirety of the conversation. And I know that sometimes to make a more holistic, shalom-oriented community, you have to be willing to rustle a few feathers of the people in power. And I think I’m okay with that.

Ruth Perry (03:18)
Before we talk about your book, can you take us back and tell us about your background and your faith journey?

Jenai Auman (03:24)
Yeah, yeah, I tend to tell people I’m a spiritual weirdo in that I wasn’t raised in the church. I was feral as a child, meaning on Sundays we actually had like culverts and ditches in our front yard where I lived in the boonies. And I would be probably, I know we shouldn’t have done this, but playing in the ditches after it rained, skimboarding, doing you know, purely feral stuff as a kid and for that part of my childhood, I did love it. I Filipina. My mother is Filipina. She immigrated to Texas in the 80s and I was born in the 80s. And so I was baptized into the Catholic Church, which is a part of like Filipino cultural norms. My mom, I would say isn’t a practicing, she’s not a practicing Catholic. But baptizing your children is something that was very important to her. So she baptized me, baptized my brother. My dad, he was raised Southeast Texas. I don’t know if people know Southeast Texas very well. I mean, most people know Houston, which is where I am today. But I was born very close to the Louisiana border. And so what happens in that area, there are Catholic churches, but also Southern Baptist churches.

And also a lot of Pentecostal churches. And I’m talking about not only like the charismatic, sometimes you’d see somebody in a tambourine go around the sanctuary or something like that. But Pentecostal in the way of like they don’t cut their hair, they wear long skirts, things like that. So that is kind of the ecclesiological makeup of Southeast Texas. So I wasn’t raised in the church, but I was raised in an area where there were a lot of those three types of churches.

My dad, he had a beef with God. He had a beef with God since before I was born. So he was kind of culturally agnostic, vacillated between agnosticism and atheism. Sometimes he would say like there is no God or sometimes he would say, I don’t know if there’s a God. But antagonistic toward just the idea of God or toward anyone trying to pray over him or proselytize him. So that is my childhood. I remember my dad quoting Gandhi to me. I don’t even know when the first time I heard like the story of Noah in the ark, you know, and I feel like that’s a pretty standard church that kids learn about in Sunday school. I heard Gandhi and the quote was “I don’t have a problem with your Christ. I love your Christ. It’s your Christians that I have a problem with because they are so unlike your Christ.” My dad would quote stuff like that at me during elementary school. So a kind of strange cultural makeup. I think what I encounter in a lot of the deconstruction spaces or even the decolonization spaces is that a lot of people grew up evangelical. I grew up kind of adjacent to evangelical culture, but I wasn’t swimming in it.

When I opened the Bible for the first time, I didn’t know how to pronounce a lot of those words in the Bible, I didn’t know how to pronounce Isaiah and things like that. So I came to faith and I converted, I usually use the word converted. I think it’s less a Christian-ese. I came to faith, but I converted when I was 17. I kind of had like a traumatic, series of things that happened when I was later in my teens and at 17, I drove to the church that my grandmother was previously a part of and it really was kind of an effort to be close to her. Like she went to church every day. And so I thought I’ll go and I had lost her. She passed. And so I wanted to be near her. And so I drove to the church to be near her more so than to be near God at 17. So I converted to Christianity and I would say maybe, I don’t know, five years later, three, five years later, I had some semblance of like a trusting faith in the God of Christianity. So that’s kind of a, I guess a 30,000 foot view of my spiritual makeup.

Ruth Perry (06:55)
That’s interesting about your dad quoting Gandhi. in such a formative time of your life to have that perspective, then it gives you the lens when you are in the church of how the world is perceiving Christians, that maybe some people who are just always in that bubble aren’t even thinking about that on that wavelength.

Jenai Auman (07:13)
Yeah, I would say that my dad, you know, he deconverted probably in the 70s, maybe earlier than that. I don’t really know. He passed, I want to say 15 years or so ago. And my dad and I had a tumultuous relationship. So perhaps a lot of the reason why I didn’t listen to his advice was because I was actively rebelling against him. And so I know though, if he were here today, it would be the biggest, I told you so, you know? And it would be well deserved. I would get it. And in hindsight, I have a lot of empathy for what my dad suffered and weathered and how it was connected to his, like how his own wounds were connected to his church experience. yeah, I am, yeah, it’s such a full circle moment for sure.

Ruth Perry (07:55)
So your book is titled Othered. Can you tell us who are the othered?

Jenai Auman (08:00)
I didn’t want to name it an introduction. I wanted to name it an invitation. So the introduction is called An Invitation for the Othered. And I’ll just read the first few sentences. This book is for the othered, the abused, exiled, excommunicated, scapegoated, and marginalized, the misfits, the grieving, and the angry, the shunned and forsaken. This book is for those pushed out of faith communities and for those on the precipice of making the hard decision to leave. Or maybe you haven’t left at all, but you’re quietly existing on the margins because you’ve been hushed and bullied into falling in line after seeing too much. The words of this book are for you who do not know how you got here or what to do next.

So for me, the othered are the people who don’t fit or who have seen something in the cultural norms of the systems that they’re a part of and they no longer think that those norms are good for them at the very least or for the community by and large. And those norms usually aren’t good for people because it comes with abuse, because it comes with toxic relational dynamics. It comes with some sort of harm with racism or xenophobia or homophobia any any any harmful norm that is normal in a cultural system the othered or those who see it and are either actively resisting or trying to figure out what to do next or whether they feel free enough to resist so it’s a pretty broad category and I wanted it to be a broad category because I don’t think it’s just one particular group of people. It certainly includes those who’ve experienced spiritual abuse, but sometimes that language is not accessible to people. They haven’t quite named that experience for themselves or maybe they feel like spiritual abuse doesn’t name their experience. Maybe they would overtly call it racism or maybe they would over at which I would say racism, xenophobia, homophobia, trans, those things in the church are spiritual abuse. So I wanted it to be a broad term that invited many people who I think have a common experience, although it may look very differently from context to context.

Ruth Perry (10:11)
And can you share the moment when you first realized that that word described your experience in the church?

Jenai Auman (10:17)
I, like cognitively, I would say I believed pretty early on. I don’t think I use the word othered, but I remember in like talks and conversations, articulating specifically, I feel very other right now. And I kind of used the imagery of a table. Well, actually it was physically at a table. We were at a table with, it was me and my husband and then the six pastors who were pushing me out and thinking cognitively and I believe saying, this is not a round table conversation there’s one side of the table with the six of you and then another side of the table with my husband and I and so we are not there is not equal power here there is not equal value here I am other so it’s very early on that I latched on to being the other. And that is a long understood philosophical concept that other philosophers have studied for centuries. So I’m definitely not the one to coin that term. But as a title for the book, or just a title for people who have been harmed in churches in general, I would say about two years later I realized othered is a really broad and welcoming, kind of like an all-inclusive term for people who have just felt this sort of exile and ostracism from the church.

Ruth Perry (11:37)
How did your own experiences of being othered, both culturally and spiritually, shape your understanding of belonging and exclusion?

Jenai Auman (11:44)
Oh my gosh. so, Well, let me ask you, have you ever stepped into a room and you were like, I don’t fit here? How did you feel? What goes through your mind the moment you think I don’t fit here?

Ruth Perry (11:56)
You feel exposed and vulnerable and unsafe and not sure of how to proceed or maybe exit. It’s disorienting.

Jenai Auman (12:07)
Yeah, well, I would say I felt that feeling very early on in life. So I tell people whenever you have a parent who’s immigrated to the States, who doesn’t speak English as a first language, who barely spoke English by the time I was entering into kindergarten, Think about the time when you were entering kindergarten or elementary school. And you have your mom or a present parent who is explaining to you what it’s like to be in school, like what are the cultural norms of school? And so my dad by and large was not present in parts of my life. And so my mom was my primary caretaker for the early childhood. And I did not have a parent who could explain those cultural norms to me. So as far as being othered, being the daughter of an immigrant that’s like strike one, that was already a resource that I didn’t have. And so I from the from childhood would walk into rooms and not know what’s normal. I wouldn’t have been able to put the language to this but immediately trying to figure out how am I supposed to behave in this situation, what’s culturally acceptable? What’s what’s normal? What do I need to do?

And remember, like, I’m an enneagram two what do I need to do to get people to love me? And I don’t know what those things were. So yes, exposed, unsafe, vulnerable. That’s like the trinity of scary and afraid, like as a kid. And so I felt that at pretty young age. Obviously I grew up and I kind of found my teeth, figured out where my footing was. But still, would walk into situations. I’ll give you a, this is a funny anecdote. I’m a very tattooed woman and I wear Black. I have dark eyeliner on. I wouldn’t say I’m goth. I just like dark colors and I like this aesthetic.

And my husband is not this way. He is an Enneagram nine. He doesn’t know style. He’s just gonna wear the blue button up and the khakis to work as an engineer. Like that’s just what he’s going to do. And I remember the first few months at his job, maybe the first year at his job, I’d never met his coworkers until a Christmas party. And I, in my head kind of go through like, do I show up with like long sleeves, hide my tattoos at this, you know, professional Christmas party? Or do I just show up authentically? And I have chosen to show up authentically. And I think I surprised his coworkers. Like I clearly didn’t fit. And I thought, I think it’s funny now. I mean, it was like a harmless situation. And my husband came up to me later and he said, my coworker thought that I was married to someone. He was like, he wasn’t expecting you. And I was like, well, what, who was he expecting? And my husband told me Joe was expecting someone that looked like Laura Ingalls Wilder. And my husband was like, who is that? And I was cracking up and I’m a reader. So I know books. And I said, Little House on the Prairie. So they were expecting your wife to look like someone from little house on the prairie. And I show up tattooed with like almost a full sleeve and I love that. I love being weird now. Like I’ve embraced that part of myself.

And I think that is a part of belonging is learning to walk into these rooms where you don’t fit and maybe you don’t belong I know I don’t belong in certain cultural context now I know that I can walk into even a church even a church that says come as you are we welcome all parts of you; even a radically inclusive church I can walk in and still feel like I shouldn’t belong here, but I do belong to myself And so I have learned over the course of my life. that so often I abandoned myself and if you’ve read the book that you know this I abandoned myself and my preferences the things that make me laugh the things that delight me, but also my safety my sense of trust in myself trusting my gut I abandoned a lot of those things in order to belong in certain spaces. And so I think my experiences both in the church and out of the church have led me to this realization of like what it means to belong to myself, it means to have this inner sense of stability such that I trust my internal resources and I trust I have those internal resources that will say, hey girl, you need to leave, you are not safe here.

And so belonging, I think does include a people group. And I have that inner discernment that knows when I am truly welcomed into a space. And I have been in those spaces and I believe it’s beautiful. And when you know, you know that all of you is welcomed. I think all of us experience not fitting and we can either use those experiences as fear fuel to scare us into complicity or to compliance or obedience or it can be the inner well of wisdom that helps you better discern places that you want to be and show up and take up space in the future.

Ruth Perry (16:52)
Something I appreciated about your book, each chapter you give a biblical example of a character or a story that related to what you’re talking about. I know you talked a lot about how you related to the story of Joseph being betrayed in your personal story with your church trauma.

I’m a pastor and so I’ve been preaching through the lectionary for almost three years now. And this past Sunday, the text was from John chapter nine about the blind man who was a beggar and Jesus healed him with spitting in the dirt and creating a mud and sent him to the pool of Salome to wash. then instead of celebrating his entire community freaks out and they interrogate him basically. The neighbors don’t even recognize him anymore now that he’s healed. And the Pharisees keep saying, we know that you are a sinner or you were born in sin and we know that Jesus is not from God because we know from Moses. And they keep using the word we know, we know they’re so certain about their system. So I talked about systems in my sermon.

Could you explain to us, what does the word system even mean? What does it mean when you’re talking about a system and the church or in the church? And then how is othering a typical part of a church system?

Jenai Auman (18:06)
Hmm. Yeah, I am a seminarian. I’ve studied theology. I am not a biblical text scholar. So I usually leave that to my friends that I trust. But one thing that I learned from another friend, his name’s Rohadi, he wrote a book, When We Belong. And in his book, he mentions that there actually is a word for systems in the Bible. It’s the Greek word cosmos. And I think You can find it in Ephesians, “For our battle is not against flesh and blood, but against like the rulers and the principalities.” And there’s the word like the systems of the world. or the somewhere in there. And he says cosmos can be translated kind of as a system. I mean, the universe, the actual cosmos are a system, they’re systems of systems of inter like planets that rely on on gravity and proximity to one another.

And so whenever I talk about the word system, my undergrad is in behavioral health. And a part of my behavioral health science degree was learning about family systems. I thought I was going to become a licensed therapist, and that did not happen. But I do appreciate my education. And one of the things we learned in family systems is that everyone kind of has a role to play in a family system. And whenever there is some sort of harmful family dynamic or if there’s even an addiction within a family, you can’t just treat the person with the addiction. You actually have to treat the whole family because somehow, especially over the course of time, there are micro adjustments that people have made in their behaviors such that they’ve enabled a particular addiction or a particular behavior. It doesn’t even have to be an addiction.

For instance, if dad is never expected to do any of the housework and it’s falling all on mom or all on the other spouse or all on the kids and it’s wearing people down and like relationships are breaking down, well, the system needs to adjust because there have been micro adjustments over the course of years or decades that have allowed for this maladaptive behavior to foster. And so whenever I talk about systems in the church, I talk about something similar. Have you ever used family language of churches before?

Ruth Perry (20:14)
Absolutely, yeah.

Jenai Auman (20:15)
Yeah, and I would say in the same way a local congregation has adapted to certain behaviors. So you expect these certain folks to serve in the children’s department or the children’s ministry. You expect certain people to be preaching. You expect certain people to X, Y, and Z like be the ushers to pass out or distribute communion or take up the offering, whatever your norms in your congregation are, you have a certain family system happening. And my use of that language is that in toxic systems, there’s actually someone who’s dictating what the system looks like. They have a lot of the power that enables them to structure the system. And then people in power in a toxic system have none of the responsibility to execute the labor of the system.

And that is where I believe it gets toxic because you put a lot more undue stress. The load, the weight that everyone is shouldering and carrying is very unequal. And so when you have a lot of people that have a lot of responsibilities but no power to change the system, I would say that creates undue stress and lots of relational dynamics. There are fraught relationships. And so I tend to use the word system in that way, kind of in the family system way but for anyone who is familiar with, other like therapeutic modalities, there’s internal family systems. So, if you’re familiar, there’s the parts language of like a part of me feels this and a part of me feels like there’s just a lot of moving parts in a system, particularly in a local congregation.

Ruth Perry (21:49)
In your writing, you talk about how churches sometimes cause harm instead of offering refuge. Why do you think faith communities struggle to recognize when they are harming people?

Jenai Auman (22:00)
I think they struggle to recognize that they’re harming people because they haven’t done the work on the front end to acknowledge harm is eventually going to come. Like they haven’t done a lot of the proactive work of protecting the vulnerable. And when your cause of your organization, your mission statement or whatever is supposedly altruistic and someone is bringing forward an allegation that they were harmed under this organization and it goes counter to their mission statement and their mission statement is probably in their bylaws. It probably is how they drive donors and there’s a lot of reasons why a church would not want to help like foster repair.

And I will also say there are some churches, I believe, that are fostering repair. And I think a lot of them who are able to do that are acknowledging we needed to do work on the front end. Before there’s a crisis, you need to have a plan. Because if you try to construct a plan in the middle of a crisis, you’re going to hurt a lot of people. So many and I don’t subscribe to this anymore like the doctrine of original sin and we’re all sinful Like if you believe that then you should inherently believe that you’re gonna, even if accidentally even if unintentionally harm someone then have a game plan But those who I think there’s like an identity thing in churches again. It’s the family family dynamic of like, I’m a proud member of this church and almost proselytized to the degree of like bringing people into this church. What does that do to my identity when the leader of this church has caused a lot of harm? It not only hurts the organization, but the identity of every member of that organization. It’s almost too risky.

And usually in enmeshed systems where like identity and group think is so enmeshed. It’s hard to think that your altruistic, goodness, gospel driven mission could actually hurt someone and I think there are some people who do knowingly hurt others And I think they they also spiritually abuse their congregation in a way to manipulate them to perpetuate the hurt onto a particular victim. And also I think that there are churches that are unintentional about their hurt and they weren’t wise enough to do the proactive work on the front end to mitigate risk and actually center the vulnerable, center the poor in spirit, center the pure in heart, the peacemakers. They haven’t done the work of like, this is what it looks like for us to center these things. And I think it’s just easier to just sideline the hurt person instead of actually doing the work of changing the system.

Ruth Perry (24:29)
How does power factor into church systems and how can people with power other others?

Jenai Auman (24:34)
Well, and I think I mentioned this in the book, I don’t think I elaborated on it as much as I would have liked because of space, but power dynamics change and shift. So I do concede in the book that some pastors can also be spiritually abused. I think some people erroneously think that I’m always attacking pastors and that’s not necessarily the case. I think some pastors are spiritually abused by other pastors.

I also think that pastors, in a small church context, and I’m talking like very small church context, congregationally run, meaning they vote in and out and they decide your salary. I think the power dynamic shifts to a more social power. So whoever has the power to change the system, the power dynamic is in their favor. Whether that’s one man in a mega church or whether that is a handful of congregants who have the financial pull to make decisions and to vote someone in or out. Because I know there are different church systems that do things differently. Some pastors are appointed, some pastors found their own churches and it is built around them. Those are usually centered on the pastor. And then there are congregational situations where the congregation has full sway. And maybe not all of the congregation, but a few members of the congregation has full sway. So power dynamics change.

That’s why I love the work of Kimberlé Crenshaw. She’s a Black woman who’s, believe, a sociologist. She coined the term intersectionality. Intersectionality takes into account of different power dynamics among different groups. So for instance, there is this idea that intersectionality exists between the Black community and the white community. But you need intersectionality to acknowledge that the difference between men and their power and women. And that’s is women on both sides of the Black and white spectrum. so intersectionality takes into account all of these compounding identities of marginalization. And the more marginalized identities you have in a particular context, the more likely you are to be sidelined and ostracized. And so it’s not as the power dynamics change, they are intersectional.

For instance, women’s suffrage, in the early 20th century, late 19th century, I have been telling people that’s white women’s suffrage because women of color didn’t have the right to vote until much later, much later, not until like the Civil Rights Act. And so I tell folks like there was no intersectionality then it was really only white women who could vote because they didn’t see the intersection of race as an issue. And so power dynamics changed because the context changes.

And so it’s just important to learn and educate yourself more on power dynamics so that when you enter a new context, when I enter a specific space, I can kind of see who the power holders are and it gives me information on what I want to do with that. Do I feel safe here? Do I want to spend time here? And so, yeah, it’s so confusing and so complex that people study it. And I will say to anyone listening you can read about it and I write a little bit about it in the book.

Ruth Perry (27:40)
And on your substack. What is your substack?

Jenai Auman (27:42)
Yes, it’s jenaiauman.substack.com. It’s actually gonna get a rebrand soon. It’s gonna be a very fun rebrand. It’s like gentle and kind of orthodox, but then a little like spicy. I feel like that’s kind of the niche that I’ve kind of made for myself, but I do write a lot on sociological power dynamics and the politics of respectability, again, that is work done by Black women that I’ve learned from on the politics of respectability, how we all play the politics of respectability, and how I suspect that most people who don’t have very much power in their context don’t like playing the politics of respectability, but they feel like they have to. So yeah, I write quite a bit on that and I, yeah, I invite people to join me on Substack.

Ruth Perry (28:23)
So you’ve talked about how systems protect themselves rather than the wounded. What are some signs that a church culture has become more invested in self-protection than in healing?

Jenai Auman (28:33)
There’s this great work by a Psychologist named Carl Rogers, I don’t know if anyone’s familiar with him, but he coined the term person centered therapy Meaning what a particular person needs in their own therapeutic space like a client needs in their therapeutic space might be very different than what you as the therapist have been trained in or how you would maybe normally use one particular modality with a client, with this particular one, you may need to go a different direction because it’s not helpful. It doesn’t foster healing. It doesn’t matter that the other modalities have research on research about how they’re beneficial and adaptive and helpful 90 % of the time. If that’s not true for this person, you can’t go with the research, you go with the person. So I think in a church culture, they, they go off of numbers, kind of like research. This is what we’ve we’ve seen when we preach on this, we have less attendance, we know that people show up the most on Easter and Christmas. So like a lot of the decision making factors have to do with numbers, And that’s quantitative. I was an engineer early in college, obviously, I’m not an engineer anymore, but I retain some of it.

But I did quantitative analysis and that is strictly numbers. Like what do the numbers say? But healing for a person is qualitative. Person-centered therapy is a qualitative treatment. What is the quality of care look like for this person in front of me? And sometimes qualitative treatment is very costly. It is not profitable. It takes a lot of time. It takes a lot of energy. And I will also add, we live in a capitalistic society. So we have high emphasis on, you know, pick yourself up by your bootstraps. And we tend to devalue people who are unable to pick themselves up by their bootstraps, let alone acknowledging the fact that some people don’t have boots. And so qualitative care is very costly. It slows down the system.

I’m reading actually from a writer right now, his name is Paul Kingsnorth, and he has a book that recently came out called Against the Machine. And he talks about how the machinery of our societies, the mechanisms of industrialization of capitalism actually don’t see us as human. And when that machinery gets ingrained in the culture of the church, you see people who are hurting as obstacles that are in the way of the machinery of the church and slowing down to care for them is a problem. The recent Knives Out movie, what’s the name of that?

Ruth Perry (31:09)
Was it Wake Up Dead Man? Yeah.

Jenai Auman (31:11)
Yes, that one with Josh O’Connor as the priest and they’re trying to solve this mystery and he’s on the phone. I’m trying not to spoil it for anyone but he’s on the phone with someone who’s like chatty Kathy. And for anyone who has worked on a church staff, you know that those people exist. They’re just chatty. sometimes you enjoy it and sometimes they’re in the way from getting you back on track with the investigation. And then in the movie, this chatty Cathy hits Josh O’Connor’s character pretty hard with some real stuff and if you watch his face, it switches and he’s like, I need to care for this person. And Daniel Craig’s character, the detective is like, man, like we were solving a case and Josh O’Connor goes into another room to talk to this woman who’s going through something legitimate and real and cares for her.

Like caring for a person is costly when currency exists. I think money is made up. Money is a system we’ve created. But time is truly the only thing that we have and it’s dictated away. And he gave his time, his presence to a person, even if over the phone. And it cost him some time on the investigation. And I think some churches aren’t willing to take that time because whatever reason, whatever goal that they’ve created for themselves, not saying that an investigation for a dead person isn’t important, because it is, but caring for the person in front of you, I think that was like the most Jesus-like moment, like positive portrayal of Christianity in a long time, and especially from the Catholic Church. And so I think that is a good illustration of like why churches sometimes don’t care is because people are in the way rather than being viewed as people to love and human beings to care for.

Ruth Perry (32:52)
Yeah, I love that movie. And I do think the, if you think about it, the American church today does run like a business instead of like a family, even though families can be dysfunctional too. But I mean, we’ve become the temple system instead of being the harbor and the refuge for hurting people that drew so many people to early Christianity. And now we’re just hemorrhaging people and so many of them are walking away from their church experience with hurt and pain and it’s really heartbreaking to see that.

Jenai Auman (33:25)
Yeah, it really, it is, heartbreaking. But then I also know, number one, I don’t try to fix it. And I don’t try to fix anyone the book, but I also know like they’ve got to walk their own journey. And my hope for them is that they find something about themselves that they can reclaim along the way.

Ruth Perry (33:42)
Something that really often happens when someone has experienced harm or abuse and then they tell someone else and they expect to be heard. A lot of Christians have a very hard time believing allegations of abuse. Why is it easier to disbelieve allegations of abuse and othering and harm? And then when someone is disbelieved, how does that affect them?

Jenai Auman (34:06)
Hmm. Well, it’s kind of like going back to the machinery language. It’s easier to disbelieve them because nothing for the system changes. Like if I choose to say, I don’t believe you, then the system can keep going. There is actually a Polish psychologist, He’s a Polish Jew. His name’s Henri Tajfel. He was in the concentration camps or maybe prisoner of war camps, but he fought during World War II. And he survived. He came out of that experience. He decided he wanted to study in-group and out-group dynamics. And he eventually coined, I think with a student of his social identity theory, meaning how do we socially organize ourselves? And not only did he study that, but how can one particular in-group like Nazi Germany, hate another out group, like the Jewish people. And so he studied these things and how even the church was complicit. And a lot of it had to do with social identity, meaning who I am as a person is intrinsically tied to who this group is and how this group kind of congregates. Are you a sports person?

Ruth Perry (35:11)
I have a sports son, so I’m slowly learning.

Jenai Auman (35:14)
Okay, well, then we are not the people to be having this conversation, but I’ll use it as an example for people who are listening. I am not a sports person. I do not care. Like go without me. I will not feel like I’m missing out. If everyone in a group starts talking about a particular college sports, basketball, whatever, basketball does pique my attention a little bit. But other than that, I like go into my own happy place in my brain when that conversation happens.

Because I live in Texas people argue about sports in Texas, which is probably why I’m over it. When you are a diehard Cowboys fan and someone in your presence says something about the Cowboys negatively, like it is a fight because, and I think this is true, their identity as a human being, there is pride and a good pride. Or maybe a bad pride, I don’t know, behind the idea that I’m connected to this particular sports team. Such that there are people who have decked out their entire garages. They no longer park inside their garages in Texas because it’s become their man cave with their sports jerseys on the wall. I’m not even kidding. This is for real. And their identity is almost to a core personhood level, interconnected with being a particular sports fan or team fan.

I think something similar happens with the church. I think that’s how you get Christian nationalism. There’s something within the core of you that connects with this particular group identity, whether it’s the values they say that they value, whether it’s the sort of camaraderie that is established, how you laugh together, how you find quote unquote joy with one another, there there is an identity aspect. And to Henri Tajfel’s point, there was incredible identity among Nazi Germans. And if you’ve studied World War II documentaries or learned all about that stuff, you kind of know that Nazi Germany came out of a time when Germany was suffering after World War I, and then there was economic depression. And so they were trying to survive. Nazi Germany identity, I mean, it was formed for many reasons, but it was appealing for a lot of people. It provided them security in a way that they needed security.

And I think the church does something similar today. It provides a security for something within us that we need security for and so when somebody comes up with an allegation that challenges the group with whom we identify? They are not only challenging the system. Just by making the allegation it touches the people of the group, their insecurities because that thing that they so desperately cling to, it’s been destabilized by this allegation. And so it’s far easier to say, we don’t believe Emily anymore, or we don’t believe John because he’s not in unity with us. He proved that he was disloyal. That destroys a person. How much it destroys a person varies.

If a person has a strong support system outside of the church, I think that they have some stability. But if the church, if that group was their stability and they’ve been cast out, it is detrimental. It is detrimental to a person’s health. And that was the case for my family. Our families didn’t live close to us. Our church family had become what I would have called our found family. And to be disbelieved was to be annihilated. I didn’t know who I was anymore because that identity, again, it was an enmeshed identity that wasn’t healthy, had been taken away from me. And so it is detrimental, for sure.

Ruth Perry (38:51)
Your work is deeply trauma-informed. How did studying behavioral health and trauma shape the way you approach faith and spiritual healing?

Jenai Auman (38:58)
Well, I think it’s made me a space maker. So I’m not a clinical therapist, like I thought I would be. I love having a lot of friends who are clinical therapists, because I get to witness their wisdom. And then I am recipient of just this tremendous multitude of learning. And so even with my education, there’s so much I don’t know. But what I do know is that trauma is complex, again, person-centered. We all went through the pandemic together, but It’s affected us very differently. Some of us have very different like lungs now some of us have very different X, and Z now and so my education both in behavioral health, but also in seminary and Exegetical understanding it’s made me more spacious toward different perspectives. It’s made me less fundamental like you have to believe X Y and Z or if you don’t, then you’re not a true follower of like the best way of Jesus or whatever. I don’t do that anymore.

I understand now also that oftentimes because of trauma and wounds and the pain, if you don’t want to call it trauma, if you just say that you had a young adult experience, if you had a painful childhood, that religion and faith can be a stabilizing factor. It can not only be like a true essence faith, it can also be a coping mechanism. And so it’s just made me more spacious in understanding like there’s a lot that I don’t know. And perhaps the best gift I can give a person is not more information or education. It’s just to sit with them. And Ruth, that’s exactly what Jesus did. He just gave people wounded people his time and attention.

And so I actually realized that a lot of trauma information is found sometimes in just the way Jesus treated the marginalized and the oppressed and the wounded and the heat, like the people that needed healing. And so it’s just made me slow down and to resist the ways in which the machines of culture and the systems of culture have required that I speed up. Sometimes resistance is simply slowing down and paying more attention to the person in front of you.

Ruth Perry (41:01)
That’s so good. I know a lot of people, when they experience church harm, they feel like they have lost God in the process along with their institution. How do you help people disentangle God from their experience of church harm?

Jenai Auman (41:15)
Yeah, I think the how I would edit that question from like a trauma informed perspective is does that person want to disentangle God from their experience because they don’t need me telling them what they need to do or not do. I don’t feel like I need to defend God. That’s one thing that I’ve learned is God is so big (Also, not a man. So I try not to use he pronouns for God.) God is so big and so much more grand than we could ever realize. I don’t think God needs Jenai Auman from Southeast Texas to defend God when people are angry with God. So my question is really like, what do you want to do with your faith? What do you want to do? Like, where do you want to go?

And what do you want to process? Like as a friend, what do you want to process? We can process that. I had a friend come to me fairly recently asking me, hey, someone’s asked me to be a part of this group and X, Y, and Z. And I told her, I have opinions about this group. I’m not going to tell you what those opinions are. Again, person-centered. So I asked her, what sort of person do you want to become?

And could these people be a part of that? If you envision yourself living your best life or flourishing, what does flourishing look like for you? And what sort of people do you need around you to help you flourish? In the same way, I would ask like to your question, like your understanding of God is probably very informed by a particular worldview right now.

Like, what do you need to do to become the sort of person that you need to become? And if they want my opinion on a more expansive view of God, I’ll certainly give it to them. One of my professors, and he was quoting someone else, he said, you can’t teach someone theology in the middle of a storm. So if someone’s going through some stuff, like real life stuff.

You can’t try to throw deep theology that requires space to think about and process. You can’t give that to them because they don’t have space. They’re containing too much in their story. They don’t have space in their container for theology. And so my responsibility is just making space for them. And if there is one day space in their container to talk about theology, I certainly will do that, but I wouldn’t impress that upon them. That’s my perspective anyway.

Ruth Perry (43:30)
Yeah, no, I really appreciate that. That’s really good. I think for me, my very first really traumatic church experience was 15 years ago, For the past 15 years, I’ve read books and listened to people and gleaned things here and there and here and there. And I’ve learned to find my belonging within myself, like you talked about. And I’ve learned not to be so certain and fundamentalist about what I believe, but to have open hands because I’m probably wrong about things that I believe right now. And if God is love, then God loves me even in the areas that I’m wrong. And so a lot of those little pieces of my spiritual formation have healed over 15 years. But what I appreciate about your book is all the little lessons that have taken me 15 years to learn. You have in this little story, woven in with your personal story and with the Bible, just so much language that’s really helpful to heal. And so if anybody resonates with anything we’ve talked about today, I really encourage you to pick up by Jenai Auman and give give it a read. Listen to her read it to you on Audible. You’ll really appreciate that experience as well. And you have another book in the works, right?

Jenai Auman (44:45)
I do. I’m in the weird stage of what I want to do with it and how I want to write it. And I’m going slow. I’m also graduating seminary, in May. So part of me is like, girl, I need time. I need space. But again, it’s a part of my journey because of what I’ve experienced, I’m very active in activism spaces, social justice, because I have a mother who doesn’t speak English as a first language. And people look down on people who can’t speak English perfectly, I’ve learned since the Super Bowl, which is very frustrating for me. I am active in activism because of my lived experience, but how can you be active in activism and also like, it’s from that space within you where you become like a holistic activist. And so I’m kind of, I’m writing that book, but I’m also writing on Substack. I’m going to play with these ideas on Substack. I’m also on the internet and you can find me. I’m accessible. That’s how you and I found each other. So ⁓ I would love to connect with people. I am on Instagram too, but primarily heading over to Substack. Yeah.

Ruth Perry (45:39)
Yeah. I think it was what you wrote after the Super Bowl that I was like, I got to get her on my podcast. That was really good. And then I listened to your book and I’m just so grateful that you have spent this time with me this morning, Jenai, and that you’ve created this really excellent resource for people. And I hope that even if you don’t resonate at all with this language. I hope that you read it because you never know when you’re gonna be at odds with the system that you’re in. I mean, it’s a tenuous situation where you could be ejected at any point of departure from the social norms of that system. And it’s a really common experience, I think.

Jenai Auman (46:26)
Yeah, and again, I wrote it primarily for people who are trying to heal from this sort of thing. I’ve also wrote it for people who are walking with people and they don’t know how to navigate and you can read it along with them. And I think it’s a resource. I think it will be, unfortunately, timely for a while. I don’t think the issues of toxic systems and toxic churches is going to go away anytime soon. Although if it did, would be the biggest cheerleader. But yeah, I hopeful that it’s a resource for other people. I tried to write it to be a friend to others who didn’t have many friends in their lives.

Ruth Perry (47:01)
Well, you’re a beautiful person with a beautiful soul. Thank you so much for blessing others with your work, Jenai. God bless.

Jenai Auman (47:08)
Thanks


Please be sure to follow The Beautiful Kingdom Builders Podcast on your favorite platform: YouTubeSpotifyApple PodcastsAmazon MusicSubstack, or more! Thank you for being a part of this important conversation today, and God bless you.

006 I Rev. Dr. Matthew McNutt on Abuse in New Tribes Mission / Ethnos360

In this conversation, Ruth Perry and her brother Matthew McNutt discuss their experiences as missionary kids in Tambo, a boarding school in Bolivia, South America, focusing on the rampant abuse that occurred and the institutional failures to protect vulnerable children. They explore the long-lasting effects of these experiences, the importance of believing victims, and the need for accountability within church and parachurch organizations. The conversation highlights the challenges faced by survivors and the necessity for change in how abuse is addressed in religious contexts.

Visit ⁠matthewmcnutt.com⁠ to find more detailed information about Matthew’s experiences at Tambo in Bolivia, and his work on a recommendations panel during IHART’s investigation into abuses in New Tribes Missions (now Ethnos360). And visit GRACE (Godly Response to Abuse in Christian Environments) at netgrace.org if you need resources regarding abuse prevention and response.

Enjoy these nostalgic pics from our time in Bolivia:

You can watch our episode on YouTube or find it on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music, and more! Please help us spread the word by subscribing, rating, and sharing with a friend.

TRANSCRIPT:

Ruth Perry (00:15)
My guest today is my much older brother, Dr. Matthew McNutt. I’m very pleased to have you today, Matthew.

Matthew McNutt (00:23)
I was pleased to come on until the much older, the, see, ⁓ yeah, good, good cover. That’s, we’ll see.

Ruth Perry (00:26)
much older and wiser, I should say. Yes.

And do you prefer to go by Reverend Doctor or can I call you Matthew?

Matthew McNutt (00:35)
Call me Matthew.

Ruth Perry (00:36)
I invited you on today because one of the things that is on my heart for the church is to care for our most vulnerable members. And we had the opportunity as missionary kids, to see how that can go sideways and all the wrong ways if the safety of children and the vulnerable is not prioritized in an organization. And so our topic today is rather heavy. And I just want to mention that before we dive in, because a lot of people have experienced spiritual, physical, sexual abuse in their lifetime. And so this might be an episode that is challenging for you or that you might not even want to listen to.

Particularly, we’re talking about a missionary boarding school in South America, but I think this was across the world in this organization and other organizations as well, that this was a common problem in these missionary boarding schools, that there was rampant abuse.

So Let’s share our experience. We weren’t always missionary children, but in 1989, our family moved to Bolivia and I was going into fourth grade at the time, but you were going into high school, right?

Matthew McNutt (01:46)
I was going into 10th grade. It was actually the fall of 1990. I guess this being much older and wiser helps me remember it. It helps that I kept a detailed journal too.

Ruth Perry (02:00)
I was thinking I was nine. I was born in 1980, so I was thinking I was 89.

Matthew McNutt (02:04)
89 was my freshman year of high school, 89-90. So 90-91 was the school year that we moved to Bolivia with New Tribes Mission, now known as Ethnos360. But yeah, we moved to Bolivia. Our parents were associate mission staff with New Tribes Mission, which means they were short term. They were going down for a two year commitment. It ended up becoming three years working at the boarding school as third and fourth grade teachers as part of that staff for the first year and half. Then they were transferred to Paraguay for a little over a year before coming back to Bolivia in time for my high school graduation. And then we returned to the US where they jumped into training to go full time with the mission before eventually leaving a year or so later and accepting a call to the church in Maine.

Ruth Perry (02:57)
Yeah, so moving to South America was very exciting. My dad had been an associate pastor at a church in Washington state and had been leading short-term mission trips. And he had been to Bolivia and really was blown away by his experience there. So that’s how we ended up moving to be short-term missionaries there. And so I think our expectations were very high that this was going to be extraordinary.

And it was in many, many ways. It was an extraordinary experience. And I’m really excited that we have that as part of our childhood. I heard Gabor Mate recently talk about how different siblings do not have the same childhood. And one of the ways that that’s true between you and I is that while we were in South America, I always lived with my parents. But the school pressured mom and dad to put you and Danny into the dorms. And so you were living in the dorms at Tambo. The school was very remote. We would get there by bus. I think it took 12 hours from Cochabamba or what was it?

Matthew McNutt (03:55)
Yep, from Cochabamba, six hours from Santa Cruz. The mission, when they had built the school decades before, had intentionally landed it in the middle of nowhere because they did not want missionary kids to have access to movie theaters and the other temptations in the cities, which is wild. As a youth pastor now, I’ve been a youth pastor for 25 years, and it is wild to me that it was more important to have kids hours and hours away from the temptations than it was to have them close to hospitals and emergency care. Like students died at that school over the years, but it was more important to be remote and away from temptation than it was to have access to health services.

Ruth Perry (04:42)
They had a typhoid and a hepatitis outbreak while we were there. And then in the surrounding area, there was a cholera outbreak. And we’re talking about a very short time that we were there, three years.

Matthew McNutt (04:49)
Yeah. Yeah. We called it the HEPA-CHOLEROID OUTBREAK because that was crazy year. That was our first year in South America.

Ruth Perry (04:59)
Yeah. I got an intestinal infection. So while everybody else is getting hepatitis and typhoid, I’m dealing with something totally different, but they kept treating me for hepatitis or typhoid. And so I nearly died our first year there.

Matthew McNutt (05:12)
You mentioned Danny and I were put in the dorms. He was in middle school, I was in high school. If I was in 10th grade, he was in sixth grade. And there was enormous pressure from the established staff that kids should be in the dorms. Which is funny because the guy that put the most pressure on our parents, Al Lotz, did not have his kids in the dorms. They were in his home with him. But, whatever. There was enormous pressure. you were close to death. Dad had hepatitis at the same time. And so the two of you were rushed into the city. Both of you had really severe cases and there was enormous pressure on mom that she could not leave the school to be with you guys because the task was so much more important. And these boarding schools were a way to get the kids away from the parents because the mission task was the most important thing.

Trust God with the kids but what people didn’t really talk about is where they tended to get their best teachers was through the associate program short-term staff who were then unable to really make much change because if they made waves, they were asked to go home early. And if they played nice, they could stay longer. But most of the long-term staff at the school were there because they didn’t fit in well in other places in the mission field. When you talked about we showed up with rose-colored glasses, I was not happy about moving to South America. I was 15. I liked my life. I had a best friend.

I had stuff going on. I was not happy to go. In hindsight, I loved that I spent years of my life living abroad. It really changed my perspective on a of things, but that first year was a really rough transition. But one of the things that was a shock for our parents was finding out the number one reason that most of the missionaries would leave the field at least at that time, was because they didn’t get along with other missionaries. Everybody had the same call, but man, just like there’s a lot of conflict in churches in the US, there’s a lot of conflict on the mission field, and it’s a lot harder when there’s only three families out in a remote base. If you don’t get along, it just gets bad quick. And so…

It’s so hard to find missionaries to begin with. It’s even harder to find missionaries who are able to raise their support and get to the country that once you get missionaries down there, if they don’t fit into what they were called to, man, there’s a desperation. We gotta put them somewhere.

Right? Like we can’t waste these bodies. And so we had dorm parents and teachers with no formal training that did not go to the field for that. I remember one couple wildly racist. They hated Bolivians, but they were missionaries to Bolivia.

Where do you put a missionary couple? Like, well, put them with the missionary kids and make them dorm parents. We had other people that had all sorts of conflict in other places, couldn’t fit in anywhere. Well, then they can be dorm parents. They can be teachers. And it was just a weird mix of dysfunctional career missionaries that couldn’t fit in in other places. Very few of them were at the school because that’s what they went to Bolivia to be missionaries for. Which right away creates a really dangerous groundwork for who’s gonna be working with kids.

On top of that, there’s been a handful of psychologists and counselors out there that specialize in boarding school counseling. A lot of it actually comes out of England because there’s a real boarding school culture there, not Christian but just boarding school in general. And one of the interesting things to me is I was in recent years processing some of what we experienced and what could have happened differently is those counselors would say, it is virtually impossible to have a boarding school without physical and sexual abuse. The schools just in general, secular, Christian, whatever, are going to attract predators because they’re gonna have access to kids with a lot less supervision.

Even if you have every perfect adult, there is going to be student on student abuse, sexual and physical and verbal, because it is impossible to provide the kind of supervision that a child would have at home with their family. Even where we know families don’t have as much communication and supervision as they probably should have. If you stick 15 or 20 high school guys in a home together with one set of parents, even if they are the best dorm parents in the world, there’s no way for them to adequately supervise and protect 15 to 20 high school boys even from each other. And so yeah, our boarding school had tons of abuse.

When we first went down, just in the three years that we were there, there were several missionaries kicked out of the school and off the field for sexual abuse of kids and students. And I remember for years thinking to myself, that must have just been a really weird three years in Tambo’s history. Like just bizarre, like how could that possibly be whatever?

And around 15 years ago, 16 years ago, one of my friends from Tambo who had rejoined the mission was stunned to find out that his abuser, who was not kicked out while we were there. She was still there when we were there as students. I think you had her as a teacher, Susan Major. Yeah, I’ll say names. I mean, even as students, she was no longer allowed to spank kids because she had so viciously beat and left scars on kids for the most minor offenses. So it was known, she was a known abuser. He was stunned to find out that she was still in the mission, that she had just been moved to a boarding school in Mexico.

And so he was like, she should not be in the mission. She needs to be gone. Like this is outrageous that she’s been in the mission at that point for decades and decades abusing kids. And they were like, well, you know, the Bible says you can’t have just one person bring an accusation against the leader. There needs to be two or three witnesses. And, you know, he was kind of stunned because it was already a known thing by the time we had shown up in South America. He was my age at that point, but as a fifth and sixth grade student, he had had her and in the years since she wasn’t allowed to beat kids anymore because it was such a known thing.

And so he started a Facebook group and just grabbed every former missionary kid from our boarding school that he could think of and was just like, hey, I need one or two more people that were abused by her to be willing to come forward or she’s gonna keep abusing kids in this mission. And so some people did come forward. They did finally remove her and fire her from the organization.

But what happened in this Facebook group is it exploded with other MKs going, well, I wasn’t abused by her, but I was abused by so-and-so, or I was abused by so-and-so, or I went to the school 30 years before, and so I have no idea who she is, but I was abused by this other person. And so it just became this chorus of voices.

I’m kind of convinced that social media really forced the mission to attempt to acknowledge abuse that they had been covering up for decades and hiding for decades because victims were finally going, if you’re not gonna talk about it, we’re gonna talk about it. We’re gonna put it out there. We’re gonna reach out to news organizations. If you’re gonna refuse to do anything about this, then we’re gonna sue until you acknowledge what happened and name these abusers. And so out of that came some responses by New Tribes Mission.

When he started this Facebook group of Bolivian missionary kids, this was after New Tribes had already contracted with GRACE, organization at the time. He was part of, think he’s retired from it since then. But they had contracted with them to investigate one of their other schools already. So it wasn’t a completely new idea that there could be an investigation that something could happen. But again, that was an investigation that happened because abused missionary kids who had become adults. Studies show most people, isn’t until their 30s or 40s that they really become willing to talk about their childhood abuse and start naming names.

A lot of it has to do with about the time you have kids, the age of when you were abused is when you start to go, wait a minute. I know for me, looking at my oldest son when he turned 15, about a decade ago, was a moment for me that I was like, yeah, no, this is outrageous. The way I was being treated, the abuse that was happening, the things that happened to me that were said to me. And I’m just like, I would never be okay with a fraction of that happening to one of my sons. Like they are children. So it’s just kind of your own memory kind of why it wasn’t as bad to me or it wasn’t.

But yeah, it was the same kind of thing. Missionary kids from this other country one of them had started a website where people could leave comments and leave stories and they had put pressure until New Tribes finally hired Grace to put together a response.

Ruth Perry (14:45)
Well, I’m thinking back about just how widespread corporal punishment, like as one type of abuse, the physical abuse there was widespread because I even had the first year we were there, I had my parents as my teachers in the third and fourth grade classroom. So overall, besides almost dying from an intestinal infection, the first year was pretty positive. And one big striking difference to the positivity of it, though, is that next door to us, was a first and second grade classroom. And in between our classrooms, there was a little closet with access from both classrooms. And so the first and second grade teacher would bring in the little kids and beat them So we could all hear the little six and seven year olds who are separated and so isolated from their parents being regularly beaten by their teacher.

And then I had Sue Majors in fifth grade. Danny had her his first year when he was in sixth grade and she was a very unstable person having meltdowns in the classroom where she would just start screaming at everybody and then we all had to comfort her and tell her that it was fine. Once they stopped letting her personally beat the children, she would just send them off to Al Lotz who would do it happily for her.

Matthew McNutt (15:52)
Yeah, he was the director of the school and what was supposed to be the solution to her beating kids, was send them to him and then he would evaluate whether or not a spanking was actually justified. Like for reference, one of times Danny and some of his classmates were sent to get a beating because they were taking a test and they were supposed to keep their pencil on the paper the entire time. And he and a couple of the other kids had accidentally lifted the lead off the paper to go to the next question and so they got sent for being defiant and disobedient and to Al. Now any reasonable person would have heard that and been like yeah no this is this is not justify a beating.

The problem was Al Lotz he was my dorm parent my first year student. When I was put in his dorm, just a bully, you know, when they finally did the investigation, he was the person I named for physically abusing me and spiritually and emotionally abusing me and New Tribes said, yeah, no, he did. They sent me a letter saying, you know, agreeing and when I named him on my blog, a bunch of other students reached out to me and said, yeah, he was their abuser too. But he bragged to us. I remember being shocked as a 15 year old sitting down in our first dorm meeting. It was me and 17, 18 other high school guys. So like we’re ninth through 12th grade. I think the last time I had had a spanking, cause we had parents that spanked us. I think by the time I was 10, that was over. I got other disciplinary measures, but I remember sitting there going, I’m 15, this is over at this point.

And he told us all, I believe in spanking. I don’t think any of you are too old. and I do not believe in four or five sissy swats. He pulled out, he had a wooden paddle. It was a big wooden board. And he said, I believe in a minimum of 15 to 20 full force, everything I’ve got, swats. Which our dad, when he found out about that reported that to the executive committee in Bolivia and and they acted shocked and horrified that that was an excessive amount He didn’t believe in spanking on the butt because he was like there’s too much padding it’s got to be on the back of your legs where it’s gonna actually hurt and so guys would compare Who was more black and blue from the back of their knees to their butt. Just from these minimum of 15 to 20 swats, full force, and that was gonna be the punishment for pulling a pencil off of a piece of paper in class. It was just wildly disproportionate.

Our dad reported that and the executive committee acted horrified. They told Al, hey, the maximum you can do is five swats. Five swats is reasonable, whatever. But they didn’t notify parents. They didn’t tell any kids. Nobody was told, hey, here’s the new rule. So that happened my 10th grade year. My junior year, he beat two of the high school guys. That same excessive number of swats, he was still swatting middle school kids, that number of swats, because nobody had been told otherwise. And there was no enforcement. And at that point, our parents had been transferred to Paraguay because they had already been labeled as troublemakers for going and reporting this abuse.

Ruth Perry (19:16)
They were also replacing a missionary who had been molesting the Native children.

Matthew McNutt (19:20)
Yeah, who was molesting native kids in Paraguay. The other thing my dad had done that had labeled him a troublemaker is that first year, Rich Hine the director of the school, who would just beat kids and came out over the Christmas break that he had molested a kid. Originally, Al Lotz’s decision was he can stay, he just can’t be the director anymore, he can’t be a dorm parent anymore. You know, he’s found out molesting a little boy and the answer was, well, let’s move him into a house at the edge of the property by himself and let him stay on as a teacher and a staff member, but he can’t be the director anymore.

And they didn’t notify any of the other staff what it was he had done. They didn’t notify parents. They didn’t notify kids. It eventually got out because the executive committee in Bolivia did find out what he had done. And while they agreed with not notifying parents or kids to see if there were other victims, they did talk to all of their own kids that went to the school to make sure none of them had been abused. Those kids came back, told their friends, who told their parents, some of whom were staff. So it eventually got out.

When it got back to the US, the headquarters, they gave him 24 hours to get off the property and one week to be out of the country. He was sent back to England, because he was a missionary from England. But once he was there, they didn’t notify his church, they didn’t notify anybody there, they didn’t notify authorities, They just fired him from the mission and turned him loose. And I know that because I went to the New Tribes Bible School in England and I inadvertently started attending his home church three years after he was kicked off the field. And the pastor who had been the pastor at the church for 12 years at that point. So he was Rich Hine’s sending church and sending pastor was like, wait a minute, you came from Bolivia? And I was like, yeah.

And he’s like, do you know Rich Hine? And I’m like. Yeah, He was like, you wanna see him? I can, you know, get you guys connected. And I was like, no, no, I I don’t really know. and then the pastor goes, you know, it’s really strange. said he came back about two, three years ago from Bolivia and it’s like nobody at the mission wants anything to do with them.

Because the mission the British headquarters were there in that town and he was like they just he’s just kind of here in the community He doesn’t hardly come to church anymore He’s like I’ve never really known why and I remembered thinking

It’s like, is not my job. Like, this is not, I should not have to be the one to, and I regret now, I didn’t tell the pastor what he had done. In hindsight, I wish 19 year old me had had the courage to tell this pastor exactly what had happened. But I didn’t and at that point, you know, we had been in South America for three years. Our parents had been in the training for a year.

Now I was in the Bible school, so at this point I had been connected to the mission for about five years, and it was really ingrained. We were not allowed to talk about Rich Hine. They literally told us that when they told the kids, hey, he had a sin issue, they weren’t gonna tell us what, but he confessed it, we forgave him, it’s all good, and you are not allowed to talk about it ever again, literally. And so, yeah, five years later, I was like, I’m not allowed to talk about this.

Ruth Perry (22:41)
He also had on his way out that day, he came into the lunch room where the entire school was eating lunch and took the microphone and cried and made himself out to be a victim. so.

Matthew McNutt (22:53)
Al Lotz, yeah, Al Lotz gave him the mic and told him he could say goodbye and he was sobbing and he was like, I don’t understand why this is happening. I was told it was okay. And so, I mean, there is a certain reality. They did a disservice to him by minimizing what he had done by telling him it was okay. So it was a shock to his system. I have no sympathy for him whatsoever, right? I have no, you know, he was an abuser that was judged by other abusers. So of course what he had done did not seem like a big deal to them. yeah, he went on, all these kids in the room are crying, like, oh, the executive committee in Florida is so mean, why would they do this? He couldn’t have ever done anything to deserve this.

And meanwhile, the victim, that had had the courage to tell their parents what had happened, right? The vast majority of victims don’t speak up ever. A very small percentage do. So this victim has the courage to speak up, to say what had happened, to tell their parents. The parents actually say something, the guy gets kicked out and so now this victim is sitting in this room while all of their peers are crying and going like, this is awful. Why are they doing this to him? How could this happen? Poor Mr. Hine. You know, I remember 15 years ago when I met with the investigators telling that story, that’s the part of the report that I broke down talking about because it was just so abhorrent to me to think that there was a middle school child in that room watching everyone feel sorry for Rich Hine because this kid had done the right thing and told and got help. Right? And then people wonder why victims don’t want to come forward because they don’t get protected. They don’t get looked out for.

And New Tribe’s entire response has been to cover up and hide what is done, to drag their feet at naming anyone, to not want to tell people what happened or why.

Ruth Perry (25:10)
What would have been the appropriate response from the executive committee in Florida to the news that they had a pedophile working at a school with a bunch of vulnerable children? Like, tell me step by step what you think they ought to have done and where they failed.

Matthew McNutt (25:27)
Well, they failed on every level. They still continue to fail. In the example of Rich Hine, the moment they knew what he had done, especially since he admitted to it, right? When he was confronted, he admitted that he had done that. The reality is they should have assumed that the odds of his one and only victim coming forward are ridiculously small. There’s no way he didn’t have other.

Especially as a as dorm, like he just had access and he had authority I don’t know this for a fact, but when I named him on my blog, others have reached out to me and told me that he was transferred to Bolivia from Paraguay because he had abused kids in Paraguay and there had been issues there. And this was kind of his second chance.

If that wasn’t part of the story, if all they knew was this one kid, the moment they’ve known that, he should have been immediately fired. I think he should have been reported to Bolivian authorities because he molested a kid in Bolivia. They should have reported him to US authorities, because this was an American citizen. They should have reported him to British authorities because he was a British citizen. His supporting churches should have been notified, hey, he is being removed and this is why.

Now, I was told when I told the mission years ago, you need to notify, well, that opens you up to lawsuits and liability and all that and I was like, well, first off, if somebody is gonna sue because you say this, well then you simply get to pull out, I was like, what lunatic is gonna sue over this because then you get to bring out the evidence to prove why you’ve made this accusation, right? You get to defend yourself and then it becomes public record. But furthermore, sometimes you just need to do the right thing and maybe that comes with risk, but it would be better if they got sued by a couple abusers than all of the victims that have been suing them to try and get them to name names.

The first thing they should have done is notified every single parent that had a kid at the school the entire time Rich Hines was at that school. So that they could have conversations with their kids to be like, hey, did this ever happen to you? Do you know that this happened to anyone? They should have notified the entire student body, right?

Instead of telling us, he did something, he apologized, everyone forgave him. It’s okay, Nobody’s allowed to talk about this ever again, right? Well, now they’ve closed the door on conversations. Talking about Rich Hine is now something that can get you in trouble. They should have had a conversation, age appropriate, right? Because it was a kindergarten through 12th grade school, but they should have had conversations on every level of, hey, this is horrific this happened. And I know some of you are gonna find this very hard to believe because the reality, abusers are so good at creating a great reputation so that when accusations come out, other people find it impossible to believe.

But they should have had conversations across the board and just been like, man, if any of you know of something, have heard something, have experienced something, had something inappropriate or uncomfortable or that you’re not even sure about. Please come tell us, right? To find out the fullness of the story. I mean, this is why, you know, a few years ago, Ethnos360 finally decided to release the names of sexual offenders who were still alive because they said you know, hey, they could still be out there sexually assaulting kids. what was explained to me is we don’t need to do the physical abuse ones because most of those were beatings and they probably can’t beat kids anymore anyways because of laws and whatever. So that isn’t probably happening anymore. Like in their rationale, they only needed to name names of things they thought might still be happening to protect against that happening again. And then they release the names on a buried site, part of their website that you can’t find, it’s in a PDF, you can’t Google.

But again, that’s lacking the concern for other victims out there, right? Because the most empowering thing to a victim is to know that, if there are other victims of Rich Hine out there, having him named, gives them the courage to go, I’m not crazy. I’m not misreading the situation. I didn’t cause this to happen in some way. It wasn’t me leading him into temptation, that it wasn’t on them, it was on him and having other stories released gives validity to them and gives them the courage and strength to come forward and say, hey, actually, this happened to me. They feel like, I might get believed more, but instead, by refusing to name dead perpetrator, honestly, it helps keep the list really small of who did what.

When you give such a tightly controlled, we will only name people that are alive and that sexually assaulted kids. It keeps the list small. And I think New Tribes they don’t want to admit that in their mission organization of thousands of people, there are dozens, if not hundreds of abusers that they know about. And, you know, one of the things that was pushed back on is, well, you have to keep in mind the culture at the time. The culture at the time would have reacted differently.

No, because the culture at the time, was horrified to find out Al Lotz was beating kids more than five swats. People were already being arrested for this kind of stuff. They were already reporting things in practice in the US. So it was very much culturally understood. This is unacceptable. There is a response protocol that should be happening.

Ruth Perry (31:04)
They’ve shown through working with victims that not being believed or having their experience minimized is re-traumatizing, almost to the same or sometimes more traumatic for victims than the initial abuse because it’s so hard to just say this happened to me. And then that’s a critical time where you need to number one, I think the church needs to be educated about abuse. We need to grow our empathy, not be afraid of empathy as many seem to be nowadays, where we can weep with those who weep and hold the pain and sit with the pain of others and witness it.

And so what is your advice to people, how should we respond if someone discloses abuse to us?

Matthew McNutt (31:50)
I think we should believe victims, right? Because the response is always, hey, what if they’re lying? What if they’re making it up? When they’ve done the studies, it’s something like over 90 % of the stories that come out are true, right? So if you err on the side of believing victims, statistically speaking, you’re probably, you’re believing the right thing.

You’re taking the right side. There is absolutely a lot of truth to coming out with the abuse and not being believed or the response being poor is very traumatizing. I was 15 when we moved to South America.

Al Lotz physically abused me. I didn’t even get one of the beatings. I think he was too afraid of Dad to ever actually beat me because I think he knew Dad was one of the few guys that would have come beat him up.

There were things I saw, there were things I heard, there were things I saw happen to my friends. Early on in my 20s, I started talking to counselors. I’ve done that off and on over the years. by the time in my 30s, when this conversation really started happening, I was a lot more comfortable talking than a lot of missionary kids were.

And so when New Tribes announced, at the time New Tribes, now Ethnos360, they said they were severing their relationship with GRACE because they didn’t like that Boz when they commissioned them to do this report, he released the report publicly, naming names of abusers. At the same time, he gave the report back to New Tribes, and New Tribes was absolutely caught off guard by that. They were furious that they could not control or filter or have a say in what the report would say.

And so they severed ties with GRACE, and what they announced was that they had contracted with IHART, I-H-A-R-T, an outside investigative service that was led by Pat Hendricks. And they wanted people to come forward with their abuse stories from all of the different boarding schools to reach out to Pat. And so I did. And I was a loud advocate to other missionary kids that, know, hey, we gotta talk to these people. Like, this is the opportunity.

New Tribes is finally listening. They’re going to do the right thing here. They’re going to investigate. And I legitimately thought there is a lot to win for New Tribes in addressing this because it was stuff from decades before. By the time they were launching this investigation, they largely didn’t have boarding schools anymore.

Most missionaries were homeschooling. The stuff that had happened in the past, there were enough people that quietly knew about it that they just weren’t, you know, they had better protection things in place. The people in leadership of the mission were not the ones that had covered up and hidden things decades before. And so I legitimately went into it going like, they’re gonna do the right thing. They can own this. It’s gonna be an awful chapter of their history, but they can name these abusers and make things right. And I advocated hard for people to talk. I was the first missionary kid from Tambo that the investigative team interviewed.

They sent four interviewers. Usually they did it in pairs. They would send two investigators of the same gender of the victim to talk to them. They sent four to me. They asked if that was okay because they were like, you seem like you’re comfortable talking about stuff. Would you be willing to talk to more of us just so we can learn more about the school in general before we talk to people that are gonna have a hard time? I was like, yes, let’s do it. And so they flew in, they met with me in my office here.

They said, you know, where are you gonna feel the most comfortable? was like, my office feels comfortable. And so we had a conversation for just hours and hours. And it was really good. And Pat had hired a lot of retired abuse investigators, law enforcement investigators, and put together this team. And so then over the next couple years, they were interviewing more and more missionary kids. I was telling people, you got to do this. It felt so empowering to me to finally be heard and listened to. I was like, this is such a good thing.

And then I was recruited to be on the first recommendations panel that Pat Hendricks formed for the first report that IHART was going to issue. And I was part of a team of six or seven, eight people that we were all recruited because of different backgrounds. There were a couple counselors, there were some missionary kids, there were missionaries, former missionaries. They wanted pastoral presence. And so part of what they liked about having me on this panel was that I checked off multiple boxes. I’m a youth pastor, so I’m a professional youth worker. I was a missionary kid. I’m a pastor. And so I served on this panel. We met up in St. Louis. And I had gotten hundreds of pages of witness statements and reports ahead of time to read through just sickening stuff that had happened in this mission field. And to children and just horrifying things.

And so we met and we talked about it. And we looked at these reports and came back with recommendations that really caught New Tribes Mission off guard. Because we found a lot of leadership in the country, culpable. We also found a lot of leadership in the Florida headquarters culpable which is one of the things that had shocked them when Boz had done his report that he found leadership in Florida headquarters culpable for abuse that happened because they had covered it up. There’s just document trails showing they knew stuff and they were aware of it and didn’t respond and We made a series of recommendations and I came away from it,

It was painful. It was hard. It was emotionally draining. It was horrifying. Part of why I’d been on that panel is I had no connection to that boarding school or that country. So it wasn’t people I knew, but it was certainly similar to stories I had seen in Bolivia. And at one point I even asked Pat Hendricks because that report I felt like it was a small number of abusers named. And I said to Pat Hendricks, and to the investigators, did not many people come forward from this country?

Or was it just, I was like, as horrifying as this to say, did they just not have that many abusers there? And she goes, well, what do you mean? And I was like, well, I could name off this many abusers from just my three years at Tambo. And that school had existed for decades and decades. Tambo was the first boarding school that New Tribes had started. And she said, no, Tambo is just way worse.

And said, what do you mean? And she Tambo had the most out of all the boarding schools. So much so that at that point she wasn’t sure how she was going to handle doing a report. Did she break it up into multiple recommendations panels and multiple reports to try and deal with all of it adequately because it would be too overwhelming to have one team.

And as shocking as that was, was a part of me that was like, that makes sense because there were so many just in our three-year window there. And so I came away from that hopeful New Tribes had heard all these things and then the report was issued and it was so sanitized what it was that New Tribes released. They released a document that was supposedly the recommendations that our panel had come up with. They wrote up a completely different set of recommendations. They were completely inadequate. Victims were rightfully outraged at this anonymous recommendations panel because they were like, how could they hear the stories and come up with the, well, they weren’t our recommendations. They released a set that was supposedly from us. They were not. I still have our recommendations, right?

And then, I was invited by Pat Hendricks to be a part of a second recommendations panel for a second country. And as we were getting ready to do that, New Tribes lawyer, Teresa Sidbotham got more and more involved. She started being on these calls and telling us what we could and couldn’t do and what we could and couldn’t read. And it was really confusing to me. And I was like, I don’t understand why is there a lawyer on this call? Is this lawyer acting on the behalf of the victims? Is this lawyer acting on behalf of the mission? Because it feels like they’re acting on behalf of the mission. And around that time, New Tribes fired Pat Hendricks from IHART. And I remember going like, how in the world is this mission able to fire the president or the leader of an outside investigative service?

Well, that’s when we found out that IHART was not an outside organization. It was a process started and owned by New Tribes Mission. And they fired Pat. They got rid of her investigators. They hired other teams. They put Teresa in charge of it. She sprinted through the reports, released, again, this second panel that I was a part of what was released did not reflect what we had read or said. And what was released about Bolivia was a joke.

And once they released it all, they rushed it all out. And then they changed the name of the mission organization. Right? So all of the reports were issued in the name of New Tribes Mission, about New Tribes Mission. And then the mission became Ethnos360. And they said it was because they were renaming to reflect to how they had changed over the decades and the mission and reaching the world and changing language. But it really felt like the timing was, oh, you sprinted out all these reports, said you were done, and then changed the mission’s name.

As to your question, I felt tremendously victimized by the betrayal I felt from the leadership, misrepresenting our words as a panel, you know, that I had trusted them when they said they had hired this outside organization only to find out, no, it was their organization and they could fire and screen and filter and change the words however they wanted. That was far more infuriating to me, far more damaging, far more hurtful than what happened, you know, when I was a teenager.

And I think what it is, is there is a part of me that understands, man, Al Lotz is a physical abuser. He enjoys beating kids and he beat a lot of kids. And he wrestled and he said inappropriate things and he did inappropriate things with kids. And there is a part of me that gets like as horrible as that is.

It makes sense that he helped cover up for Rich Hine because they were friends and they were both abusers. And if you’re an abuser, you don’t think another person’s abuse is that bad, right? What is far more horrifying to me in some ways, because again, some of what other people suffered is far more traumatic than what I suffered.

I felt like I betrayed other missionary kids by advocating for them to go through this process. I felt like I set other people up to get hurt by telling them that they could go and share these stories and New Tribes was going to actually do the right thing. It’s crazy to me that, 15 years later. They are still burying names.

dozens, hundreds of names of sexual and physical and spiritual abusers that are still just out there, able to get jobs at schools, to live, you know, Bob Fisher was a sexual predator of kids that they did not name until a couple years ago. It was shortly before his death. They wouldn’t name him now because he’s dead.

He was living across the street from a middle school at one point, if he had ever been named, if he had ever been appropriately investigated at the time, there would have been things put in place to protect him from having this kind of access to kids going forward, but they didn’t. And so for me,

You know, where 15 years ago, I had all this hope and felt like, the leadership of Ethnos360 has an opportunity here to do the right thing, to cause healing, to look out for the least of these countless children that were beaten, that were molested, that were raped, that were they were told they were liars, were told they were going to hell, that they were going to send other people to hell if they said anything. For years I was the one that felt shame and embarrassment and I felt like I couldn’t say anything. Al Lotz should be the one that feels ashamed and embarrassed and afraid.

But because they never said anything, he’s the vice president of another mission that specifically does children and youth ministry. That’s outrageous. They had an opportunity to speak up for all these children that were entrusted in their care, they didn’t. And so that’s why there’s a part of me now that goes, the leadership of Ethnos360 is culpable for the silence, for enabling. I am not one of those victims that feels like burn it all down. It all needs to go away. I think the majority of missionaries with Ethnos360 are probably great people. Great hearts, I’m friends with some of them. I know they care deeply about the Great Commission and about reaching the lost. But man, the leadership? Disqualified, for covering up for being unwilling to name the abuse to take responsibility for it out of fear of getting sued. They got sued anyways. But a lot of those victims that sued would not have sued if that wasn’t what it took to get their abusers named.

To go back to your question, Christians need to believe victims. And this is real. The Bible does call us to forgive. There needs to be a path for forgiveness, restoration, but the Bible also tells us to not be like a dog returning to its vomit and to be as wise as serpents, innocent as doves. Like we need to forgive, but we also need to take steps and do the right thing. And what seems to be happening in the culture at large is that the church, that Christianity, that these missions organizations are the least likely to name and expose abusers, that they’re far more interested in protecting the organization than they are in protecting and advocating for victims.

And what they actually end up doing in that case is advocating for and protecting abusers. Not naming Rich Hine is advocating for Rich Hine. Right? It’s not advocating for his victims. It’s advocating for his reputation and advocating for the people that will feel uncomfortable knowing that the person they supported or liked did this. It’s wanting to protect the reputation that missionaries are up on a pedestal. A lot of missionaries are really great, kind people with incredible hearts for God.

Ruth Perry (46:13)
Yeah.

Matthew McNutt (46:35)
But just like every organization out there, just like every church out there that has dysfunctional people as well or leaders in sin, there are missionaries in sin that need to be named, that need to be brought to light. Because, hey, like you cannot have an organization with thousands of missionaries and 100 % of them are gonna be sinless, perfect. Like, no, we’re all fallen people.

And it says a lot more about us, how we respond. Years ago, a friend of ours, a mutual friend of ours actually, was gonna be checking out our church and it was right after one of our pastors, something had come to light.

And it was a really ugly situation and we were going to be addressing it to the church. And I said to my Hey, I got to be honest. This is going to be a really uncomfortable Sunday. I don’t know if this is the one that you want to come check out our church with. Right. And his response was so true because he said, actually, I think I can learn a lot more about your church in seeing how it handles this. And I mean, that was coming from a guy who had worked in ministry where some bad stuff had gone down.

I think some people rationalize defending abusers as, we need to minister to them, and yes, there are steps there, but there’s also things that need to happen if you’re choosing the perpetrator over the victim, which tends to be more comfortable for everyone, right? Because then we get to all pat ourselves on the back of, look, like he did this horrible thing and we are helping him become a good person again. Like we are loving him so well and we’re embracing him and we’re showing the love of Christ. And meanwhile, we’ve chased the victim off and we’ve communicated to any other victims out there, hey, this is not a safe place.

That was a long winded way of saying, yeah, I felt more betrayed by New Tribes and Ethnos360 in the response than I did in what happened 35 years ago.

And, I think that continues to be a black stain on that ministry and a black stain on their leadership that needs to be acknowledged fully and, and finished. And that’s why there are still victims hurt and upset and posting things online and trying to bring awareness. I should not have felt like I needed to be the one to write a blog post about Al Lotz.

New Tribes should have taken care of that. I should not have been the one that felt like I needed to write a post about Rich Hine. That story should have already been told.

Ruth Perry (48:59)
And I think that what we’ve talked about today is just one case study of many, many organizations. And it’s kind of drilled into us as Christians that we need to make our church seem, we don’t want to make it look bad to people. So we need to just always put the most beautiful picture forward about who we are. And then also attending church, we get that same message of like, you need to put the most beautiful picture of who you are attending church. And so I think the people who get burned and hurt, they don’t feel safe, because they know that everybody’s wearing a mask. And that’s not a safe environment. The truth is what feels safe to people who’ve experienced this kind of abuse.

Matthew McNutt (49:41)
Yeah,

Ruth Perry (49:42)
We’ve covered a lot, Matthew. I’m sorry for what you experienced at Tambo and what you experienced again through the process of trying to bring accountability. None of that was your responsibility. I mean, it just is heartbreaking what’s happened to you and to others. And I just pray that if anyone is listening who has experienced abuse in a Christian environment, I pray for your healing and for your comfort and your peace. And I pray for accountability and justice for you. The GRACE organization, it stands for Godly Response to Abuse in Christian Environments. That’s a great resource to reach out to if you need accountability.

Matthew McNutt (50:18)
Their model, yeah, and their model for handling these kinds of things is probably one of the strongest out there. The Bible talks about how we can use our suffering to be an encouragement to others. And so part of why I have wanted to advocate over the years is I feel like I have had a unique combination of experience and understanding as paired with my vocation as a youth pastor, the training that comes with that, my masters in pastoral counseling. It’s given me some access points to process and talk and be a voice that I want to be for redemption in this area and for transparency and on behalf of victims. But man, we’re not anywhere near where we need to be yet.

And you my specific context or our specific experience in connection to history with New Tribes, now Ethnos360, just paints a picture, I’m still deeply disappointed. Their response is not yet where it needs to be. And I’ve blogged about that. You my blog is MatthewMcNutt.com All you have to do is search New Tribes or Ethnos360 on there and you will find my posts where I’ve documented some of that stuff a lot more thoroughly than what I can say in a podcast format.

Ruth Perry (51:37)
Yeah, check that out, matthewmcnutt.com And thanks for being on The Beautiful Kingdom Builders podcast with me, Matthew. Do you want to add the last word here before we sign off?

Matthew McNutt (51:44)
Yeah! I mean, that would be a first. Sorry, I went so long without any sibling rivalry. No, I’m excited you’re doing this. I’m excited to be a part of it. I’ve enjoyed watching, I think over the years, this has become an unexpected platform for you. I think it’s been interesting. There were a lot of years where we were separately
processing and navigating a lot of different theological things and coming out of some really conservative and fundamentalist backgrounds that in recent years we were kind of surprised to find that we’ve both ended up on a lot of similar pages theologically but separately.

Like just kind of navigating there through our different experiences and stories. And it is funny that you can grow up in the same house, but have very different experiences there too. And very different experiences in the church and on the mission field and in school and all of that. And so, yeah, I’m excited. I’ve been loving listening to the other episodes that have come out so far and can’t wait to hear who else you’re going to be talking to in the future.

Ruth Perry (52:59)
Thanks for your support, Matthew, I love you.

Matthew McNutt (53:02)
Love you too. Bye.

Ruth Perry (53:03)
All right, bye.


Thanks for visiting The Beautiful Kingdom Builders! We’re excited about our new podcast and hope to bring light to the darkness through these conversations about gender, abuse, justice and healing in the Christian Faith. Follow along here (you can subscribe by email on the right-hand menu under our page description) or on your favorite podcast platform and social media: YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music, Facebook, Instagram, Threads, Bluesky, Pinterest, and TikTok!