Tag Archives: Community

020 I Becky Garrison on Gaslighting for God: Recognizing Spiritual Narcissists and Cultures

Find all of Becky Garrison’s books on Amazon at this link.

I had a lot of fun and a lot of “A ha!” moments reading religious satirist Becky Garrison’s ninth book, Gaslighting for God: A Satirical Guide to Save Yourself from Spiritual Narcissists. Garrison formerly wrote for The Whittenburg Door, a Christian satire magazine. Her social commentary is so insightful. In our conversation, Garrison discusses the intersections of narcissism, gaslighting, and spiritual abuse within religious communities and broader culture. She shares personal experiences, critiques of religious and political figures, and offers guidance on recognizing and resisting narcissistic dynamics. This is a very timely resource and is well-researched and comes from deep expertise.

Key topics in this episode:
Narcissism and spiritual abuse in religious communities
The role of humor and satire in exposing narcissistic dynamics
Personal experiences with narcissistic family and church systems
Connections between political figures like Trump and broader cultural narcissism
Strategies for recognizing and resisting narcissistic manipulation

Here are links for you to follow Garrison’s work:
Buy Gaslighting for God
Becky Garrison Website
Becky Garrison on Substack
YouTube Channel of Becky Garrison

Please enjoy this episode of The Beautiful Kingdom Builders podcast on YouTubeSpotifyApple PodcastsAmazon MusicSubstack, and more

TRANSCRIPT:

Ruth Perry (00:15)
My guest today is author, journalist, and religious satirist, Becky Garrison, whose most recent book is titled, Gaslighting for God, a satirical guide to saving yourself from spiritual narcissists. Thank you so much for being here today, Becky.

Becky (00:26)
Thank you for having me, much appreciated.

Ruth Perry (00:32)
I just finished your book yesterday and I was really amazed by it. It was really powerful. It wasn’t what I was expecting in some ways and then it was so more deep and insightful than I was expecting in other ways. And so I highly God anyone who wants to learn more about gaslighting and narcissism and how this intersects with the Christian church in America. It’s really fantastic.

But as I was reading your book, one of the thoughts that I kept having was, have producers or writers of the show, Righteous Gemstones, reached out to you, Becky? I think you’d be a great writer!

Becky (01:05)
No, they have not and in fact, I mean that show my only quibble with that show is that in real life Prosperity Gospels would never swear in public. We use words like sugar instead of other words. So that that was my only quibble and I don’t think they would have been quite as sexually up But that’s the Danny McBride did. He likes to have men walking around doing things and he did that but other than that he really captured I think the essence of someone even Eli and even his wife, they were still so caught up in their own narcissism that even the sweet, precious, matriarch, she was still narcissistic as all get out. It was more overt versus covert. But there was clearly an evidence that they never really cared about their congregation. They cared about the numbers and the pews and that’s what I think the ultimate definition of a narcissist versus someone who’s self-absorbed. I mean, we all like attention.

You know to be it’s nice to be recognized. It’s nice to get validated. And sometimes when you have a book coming out or another project and you can get full of your own But you can get a little too full of yourself, but then someone can call you out and say hey, wait a minute knock it off. That could not happen with the Righteous Gemstones. They lack empathy. They lack compassion. They had no self-awareness whatsoever of how their actions were impacting others. There’s also a grandiose sense of self. I am better than you. I am a better human being than you. I am smarter than you. If it’s one of those mean girl things, I look better than you. Whatever it is, I am better than other people. Not just I’m for myself, but I’m full of myself a little bit on times.

Ruth Perry (02:36)
I did appreciate towards the end of your book, you did talk about how it is important for us to take some pride in our work and to enjoy the process of creating things and putting things out there and creating community. And because in the back of my mind, I always have this little niggling thing, like I don’t want to be narcissistic, And sometimes,

Like now starting this podcast, I feel really passionate about putting alternative narratives about Christianity out there rather than the toxic forms that are so pervasive. But I don’t want to be narcissistic. And so I really did appreciate that at the end of your book, how you talked about how taking some pride in your work and like enjoying that process is good.

Becky (03:09)
Mmm. Typically, if you’re asking yourself, am I narcissistic? Odds are you’re not. The kind of celebrity who humblebrags, we’re all a little narcissistic or, I just might be narcissistic about that. Yeah, that person’s a flaming narcissist trying to deflect. But a lot of us, it is something that you struggle with. And I think it’s a legitimate struggle. How do you have an open conversation and admitting your humanity? You might look at your podcast when we can go, damn, someone’s doing better than me.

That’s normal, that’s okay to do. It’s acknowledging, it’s an inability, not there’s another human being on the other end and that person matters and they don’t matter as someone who can give you volunteer hours, who can give you their money, who can give you whatever you need from them, the affirmation, the accolades, et cetera, et cetera. But we all have that it’s important. It’s called either high self-esteem healthy narcissism. That’s what gets me to keep going up and keep going. I believe in what I’m doing. I believe in my work. I believe in it passionately and I will defend it and that might maybe come off as a bit of an a-hole. But that’s the difference between that and a narcissist.

Like if someone’s being kind of rude to me and kind of a jerk and I’m a little bit rude back, that might be justified in my behavior. I’m still going to feel a little something. I hurt someone’s feelings. I feel bad and I should feel a little bad because I hurt someone’s feelings. And what am I going to do to make that better? So I can become more regulated so I don’t snap at someone.

Ruth Perry (04:45)
How do you employing humor impactful when you’re having difficult conversations like this?

Becky (04:52)
Well, there’s role of the satirist, if you think of it. He functions as the court jestor. We keep the king honest. I’m thinking, one of my childhood influences was Monty Python. I was a prenatal Episcopalian. My late father was an Episcopal priest and a sociology professor. Do the math, do the ecclesiology. Yep, I was prenatal Episcopalian.

And so the way in which they lampoon the lunacies, you all can laugh at something collectively. And once you can laugh at something and say, my God, this is absolutely ridiculous. It helps break the energy down. And it really gives us a chance to see, because the point of a satirist is if we can break the idol, smash the idol, you can then see the glimpses of God or goodness underneath, but you first must smash the idol. And we’re in a period right now of a lot of idol smashing and that’s where you’re getting a lot of the pushback is that from the most extreme fundamentalist to the most enlightened guru, everyone has their idol and they love it. I mean, the people would love it. The Wittenberg Door, the progressives. I say this in the book when I would satirize a televangelist, all of a sudden we would satirize Jim Wallace, Tony Campallo, Brian McLaren, the whole emergent church gang. And all of a sudden you would have thought that we committed Harry Carrey on.

You know, it was like, and that’s why I did not understand that versus someone like Jerry Jenkins. So I mentioned the book. We satirized him. How can you not satirize the Left Behind series? You have to do that. It is ripe. I we had the plumbers edition, the Cleft Behind, everything. And he wrote us back and said, Hey, this is funny. I’m open for an interview if you’re up for it. And I did it. And we do not agree on probably anything theologically.

Or very few things we would agree on. But we had one the most pleasant conversations because he was a decent human being. You know, he was not a narcissist. He was kind, he was generous. And we had a very pleasant interview. Other people that I’ve agreed with on almost everything, theologically, and then all of a sudden I’ll just critique them and you would have thought that I did something horrible to them. They just go absolutely like Tasmanian Devil Ballistic.

Until the research in the narcissism. I had no clue what was going on. And now I can watch the news I can watch certain progressive pastors and their conservative counterparts and go yep. That’s a narcissistic meltdown. Okay, I don’t have to take that person seriously because you cannot have a dialogue with a narcissist. You can enjoy their entertainment If there’s no abuse involved, I want to make that clear if there’s abuse you should not be supporting this. But if the person is just a full-blown narcissist and you happen to like their music, you like their performance, go see it. It’s enjoyable. Just don’t expect anything beyond the evening’s fun. I think that’s where especially Christians, we’re looking for a form of a community. You cannot have that with a narcissist. And that’s what you have to give up is the hope that you’ll ever have a community with this person.

Ruth Perry (07:40)
So you have developed a very finely tuned narcissism detector, it seems. And then you also say in your book that coupled with that, you have an intense desire to speak truth to pastoral power. So before we dive into the content of your book, I was curious if you would share what is your personal background and experiences that have shaped you in that way.

Becky (07:45)
Okay. I was born to a hippie father from a very old, genteel southern family. He was the black sheep, to put it kindly, who was, I later discovered in my teens was an alcoholic. I’ve now since realized he was also a narcissist. And I realized that the majority of my extended family were narcissists. He married an enabling earth mother type, both of them died from their addictions in the 1970s. And at that time, the research was not there for alcoholism. So there was a lot of blame, a lot of shame. These were the bad people. And the family was displacing them. And I was also the family white elephant spotter, so to speak, in that I would say, why is so-and-so drunk? Why is this happening? I’m seeing something. And I would continuously be told, you’re making that up. That isn’t true. No, you’re not.

So I now have through the research learned that often the oldest child is the one scapegoat, because they’re the ones who can see the truth. My younger brother was the golden child. My younger sister was the golden beauty and I was the loser dreamer. So I was scape. So this dynamic came from my childhood, but yet my father in his research, I mentioned this in the book, he was studying how to reach those on the fringes. He was researching why were some kids joining SDS and others joining JAPUZA. What was it that was attracting these kids to these radical movements? Neither one of which we now have learning was really proven to be very healthy, but why were kids drawn to wanting to make a better difference? And that put them up to be easily manipulated by people that had more nefarious agendas. So that got it started.

When I discovered the Wittenberg Door, was the perfect outlet for all the anger that I felt about the church I mean I did go to divinity school because there’s a side of silly me thought I wanted to be like my father. Until I realized had I done that I don’t think I’d be here today. The church would have crushed me. I see a lot of my friends that have a similar spirit to me and the institutional church just crushed them. They do so much better when they’re outside the church doing their own thing instead of trying to function within what I would say is a highly narcissistic institution that I’m convinced that the institutional church is dead. I think there’s some individual churches doing some great work, but I think their institutional structure is just too necrotic. And through the Wittenberg Door, we began to satirize that. And that led to a lot of things. I did a lot of the faith and politics stuff. I also started when God’s Politics blog became a best seller.

That’s when I started critiquing the progressives and all of a sudden all the progressives that loved the Door, they loved how we went after the conservatives, that’s when they started to hammer us. They could not accept the fact that there could be narcissism in their midst in a more covert form. As one who grew up with the frozen chosen, as you call the Episcopalies, I would say hell yes, it’s rampant.

Ruth Perry (10:47)
I had a friend on, maybe a month ago to share a story of being a survivor of a marriage with a narcissist and her husband is Benjamin L. Corey, a progressive Christian writer about peace and nonviolence. But then in his personal life, just super controlling and passive aggressive and very much a narcissistic sponge, feeding off of my friend. And I’m just at a loss of how does someone like my friend get any justice? For right now, she was alienated from her children because of litigation after their separation. She can’t even see her children. And so it’s such a frustrating situation.

Becky (11:24)
It is and I don’t have an easy answer. I’m not a lawyer. I can’t give legal advice. I did notice that what was interesting I’m thinking about Phillip Yancey, there’s another case that came into play and that was very frustrating in that revelations came out that he had an affair. There was something involving his assistant that sounded a little nefarious. I mean, she died kind of suddenly in a freak climbing accident in a gym.

Ruth Perry (11:33)
Yeah!

Becky (11:47)
Which if you’re an experienced climber, almost never happens. So I’m still, there’s something a little fishy there. I’m just saying, I think in that case, he would never accept your responsibility. He never, he just said, I’m so great. He viewed the women in his life as pawns. And I think the best we can do is you just speak your truth to power. And I’ve been in that situation that she’s been in. When I saw abuse within the US emergent church movement in 2006, I spoke out.

And I got hammered. I got doxxed. I got cyber bullied. I was not was a very unpleasant situation. And the more I learned, I taught myself what gaslighting was and what scapegoating was, I understood the dynamics of what was happening. I learned how to do gray rock. ‘Cause in the beginning. I appeared crazy.

I would be like, what the, you know, what do you mean? I am not jealous. I am simply pointing out the fact that you claim that you’re inclusive and you have one female speaker. And then once the female speaker got on board, she immediately became just like the men because she had to preserve her place of power. So I was simply saying, you’re promoting religionless Christianity. And there’s a hierarchy. There’s a lot of abuse within this system. There’s this private networks that are spreading all kind of stuff. And because I had not

done enough work on myself and my own trauma triggers, I came off as crazy. I’m not going to recreate how I came off, but it was not to my best interest. So the first thing I say to anybody is get your own self together by finding whatever somatic therapy works for you. For me, it was EMDR. If I had not had EMDR, I don’t think I could have written the book because I would have been too triggered by bringing up past traumas. And I think that’s the first thing I would say is have you done your oxygen mask, taking care of yourself. And the second is what did not exist in 2006 that exists now are support groups. When Tony Jones tried to re-emerge as another emergent church speaker, other people all of a sudden started calling his crap out. That did not happen in 2006. Everybody was still part of, I want to be part of the cool kids crap.

Your friend now has other women who have been through something similar. You know Tia Levings has an excellent list of trauma resources on her page. Her book I Belong to Me is coming out in May. I would give it to her as a gift, you know What do you need to do for yourself? And once you get to that point, I think you’ll be in a better place. Your kids are gonna see a different mother They may be so poisoned in top that that you can’t control but you can control your response to a situation and find other people to support. When I had an experience, my first revelation of the narcissism, I had gotten to a professional and personal relationship with a mindfulness therapist who I’d later discovered is a narcissist. A malignant narcissist at best may even have some psychopathic tendencies. I couldn’t tell if he enjoyed inflicting his pain or he just didn’t care.

But I joined a narcissistic support group and I realized, this is 2016, so the research was much newer than it is now. And I realized I’m not alone. Other women have the same experience. This is a pattern. I could not see the pattern because I believed in the promise of whatever this person was preaching. I believed in the goodness. I had a good heart. I’m an empath and my God, we’re magnets for narcissists.

I’m now narcissistic resistant. Narcissists don’t approach me like they used to. You can become narcissistic resistant. They will go to somebody else. And you have to also get over your fear of missing out. And I’m also over my hypervigilance. If I narcissist, someone that I know has extreme narcissistic tendencies, hurting someone else, I’ll just point it out, but I’m not going to try to rescue people. We’ve made so much progress.

We’re in the narcissistic research right now where alcoholism was in 1980. I started the recovery movement actually in 83. And it was very nascent. There wasn’t a whole lot out there, but we were starting to understand that alcoholism was not a mental illness. It was a very complex dynamic that impacted the entire family. And how was I impacted? Being raised in an extended family of alcoholics who I now realize are many of were narcissists, including the ones that aren’t alcoholics. I mean, it was pretty much, I can count on one hand, the number of extended family members I know that are not narcissists, to be honest. And I began to realize a lot of that. And I think for people, find other people, they exist and you’ll develop a network and you’ll discover you’re not alone.

And once you realize you’re not alone, that eliminates so much of the anxiety and pain that you’re feeling. At least that’s been my experience.

Ruth Perry (16:16)
It does seem like narcissism is such a systemic and widespread issue in our culture today. And just listening to you speak, I’m a pastor’s kid as well, although my parents were teetotalers because they both came from alcoholic families. But that same dynamic was still in the family. also ⁓ dynamic those in my family that you name in your book is manipulators and martyrs.

You were quoting Brad Sargent’s friend, Linda O: “Manipulators and martyrs go together in matched pairs,” and I was thinking about how women are conditioned in the church to make ourselves smaller and to be quiet and meek and gentle and so we’re just trained from a very early age to be the martyr. And then we end up in, a lot of us end up in relationships like this where there’s a manipulator. And part of that is the culture training men too, to be this way where they feel entitled to things and they feel special.

Becky (17:00)
Mm-hmm. And then there’s people like me that just push back from the get-go and we’re always excluded. And it’s taking me a long time to develop sympathy for what I call the mean girls. I’ve been thinking about this and I began to realize that, my sister was a classic mean girl. And what it was is she from the beginning was ranked based on her beauty. She was ranked based on her looks, her ability to present. She never did the beauty pageant cheerleader thing.

But that is one of the dynamics, is that we want our women to look a certain way. We want them to appeal to the male gaze. And if you don’t, in the 70s and 80s, you’d be called lesbian, you’d be called, worse, which was really absolutely horrible for women that actually preferred same-sex relationships. To me, to use that term as a slur is just absolutely god-awful. And I kept telling them, no, I’m not a lesbian. I just don’t want a guy that’s going to be like the husband you guys married kind of thing. You know, and you tell people that sometimes you make a conscious decision that given my family dynamics, I decided it was best that I remained unmarried and without children. just decided that is the best. I cannot give a kid a decent family life. And I also need to do a lot of work on myself so I can now find a lot healthier relationships.

And so I made a conscious decision not to involve innocent humans in my family’s dynamic, which was not an easy decision to make, but it was one that I realized I needed to do because it was not be fair to an innocent third party. I think with the me girls, I just realized they got ahead by using their sexuality. They’re the ones that Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein, other women preyed on. They wouldn’t have preyed on me because they could tell by looking at me, I wasn’t going to be that compliant. My attraction to narcissism was more the spiritual guru promising this. That’s where I would be attracted to people. But in terms of just the whole mean girl persona, I I resented those women like crazy for quite a while because they could make your life miserable. If you were the little nerdy writer, those kind of women can just make life hell.

And even today, I encounter them sometimes. I’ll do spirits reporting and beer reporting. I’m often the only woman there, so it’s no big deal. But if I do wine reporting, some of those women can just be absolutely mean girl central. And some of the publicists, and and I used to be worried about that. I used to get really like, I don’t fit into these women. Now I realize we’re all going through something, even these women, these beauty queen patterns. You you see these 24 year olds that are dating 60, 70, 80 year olds, it’s not healthy, but they’re going through something on their gotta be something going on, because a lot of the mean girls are not happy. Because if you are really pleased and content with yourself, you don’t need to be an outraging bitch to other people. You don’t need to do that.

What is it about you that makes them feel like in order for them to affirm you, they have to put you down. And over time, I think these women develop a narcissistic core. I don’t know if my sister, she didn’t start out that way, but over time she became more and more self-centered because her looks, that was her currency.

Ruth Perry (20:08)
When I started reading, I thought that you’d talk a lot more about Trump. I was surprised that you didn’t. And the way that evangelical and conservative Christians have embraced him, even though he appears to many people to be a Machiavellian, like the worst kind of just really dark triad personality type narcissist. What connections do you see between spiritual gaslighting and broader cultural patterns in politics and patriarchy and nationalism and all of those intersections.

Becky (20:37)
I had an agent try to sell this book in 2018. The original book proposal was Trump focused. Publishers didn’t want it. They said, we’re done with Trump books. We have enough books. Steve Hassan did the case against Trump. There is the book, Dangerous Case, Bandy Lee edited a book on the dangerous case of Donald Trump, lays it out. She ended up getting fired, by the way, for diagnosing someone which was very questionable, but still you’re not supposed to diagnose.

I believe that Trump is a symptom. We’ve growing up as a kid. Do you remember Lyndon LaRouche? Do you remember these we’ve always had crackpots. We’ve always had nutcases. The question for me was why in 2016 when they were presented with a slate of reasonable Republican candidates The voters chose Trump that is the question that I wanted to answer it to me. That’s a deeper question that was you brewing for some time now. When you look through his story, we’ve had these church splits that have been simmering and simmering Trump is just when it look at 1979, that’s the year the Episcopal Church first ordained women.

It’s also the formation of the Moral Majority. And it was not founded on abortion. Abortion came out in 1973. Naveen Jeltsin did not give a hoot. Jerry Falwell was quoted, That’s a Catholic issue. But they were really upset about was interracial dating and that’s why they really formed. But they pretty soon had to do, we have to do a family-friendly thing because even in 79 you couldn’t say we’re the white party. You just could not say that and get elected in 79. So we had the Moral Majority.

And then you look at the year I started writing for the Wittenberg Door, 1994 was the year the Republicans took over Congress with the Christian Coalition. And we thought, wow, that’s going to be… And then you found Clinton in 96. In addition to the Monica Lewinsky scandal, he also formed the DLC, which really started to alienate a lot of progressives. You can see a lot of these shifts starting to happen in a lot of years.

We thought in 2008 when Obama was elected, he was the first president to acknowledge atheists at the National Prayer Breakfast. We thought we’re hitting this progressive revolution. in 2016, I was really excited. The DNC put up the most diverse list of candidates ever. We had people of color. We had a gay man, more women, this dynamic lineup. The DNC stacked the deck and gave us Hillary.

And that was the moment I said, we’re going to get President Trump. And my friends who are progressive said, you’re wrong. I said, no. The will of the people were ignored. You have enough Bernie bros that want change. They’re going to vote for change. They did. And that’s how we got Trump. And then in 2020, the Democrats again, had a pretty good lineup, not quite as diverse. They gave us Biden, who we did not want. I felt that the progressives kept stacking the deck and further frustrating. And when people get frustrated and they feel like no one’s listening to them, that’s when they’re susceptible to cult dynamics. That’s when they’re susceptible to saying to they’re not listening to you.

Because guess what? They weren’t. And if people feel that no one is listening to them, they will go to someone who is telling them exactly what they need to hear. That is the moment when people are the most susceptible to joining cults. I think that’s what happened in 2020. And then in 2024, well, we’re going to give you Biden again, even though you don’t really want him. And then at the last minute, we’re going to switch aroo and give you Kamala, who never won a primary, she was never the most popular candidate. And then boom, Trump gets elected again.

I’m looking at this from a broader perspective. I also think that people did not realize in 2024 how bad it was going to get. I think they thought they were taking a malignant narcissist who didn’t care about anybody, but he was going to keep America out of war. He was going keep America first. He was going do something with sensible immigrant. don’t know if sensible is not the word I’ve used, but I think people thought it was going be a continuation of the first term. I don’t think they thought that you could get worse than Sarah Huckabee Sanders. I don’t think they thought you could get worse than Jeff Sessions and Richard Barr. I don’t think they could get worse than whoever was his defense secretary. I mean, the moment Pete Hegsath and they changed his Department of War, this is when I felt it went from malignant narcissism to Machiavellianism. Because in the beginning, I do think there’s a sense that, and anybody who lives in New York City knows this, he does not care about anybody but himself. He’s mobbed up.

The media wanted this conflict circus. I think if we had investigated his ties to Roy Cohn, for example, really thoroughly, this was scary. Roy Cohn was Joseph McCarthy’s lawyer. That was Trump’s lawyer. Roy Cohn repped several mob families. He introduced him to these mob families. And the media didn’t investigate that because I think they wanted the Hillary Trump matchup. That was great for ratings.

putting Biden against Trump, that was hysterical. I mean, that was like watching a really bad Saturday Night Live sketch to watch those two men debate. I was watching this going, no matter who gets elected, we’re either going to be screwed or absolutely completely effed. And in 2024, when they did the switcheroo, I said, this is not, we’re going to get Trump again. And I just knew it. I didn’t know how bad it was going to be.

What people might want to realize is that there’s a difference between a malignant narcissist and full-blown cult. The distinction is a cult leader by nature is an extreme narcissist. They’re also a psychopath, meaning they enjoy what they’re doing. A narcissist doesn’t care a psychopath enjoys. That’s how I distinguish it. And the Machiavellian nature is they want to take over the world. They want domination over their entire universe.

Whereas in our society it just wants to be number one. They don’t feel the need to dominate. They need to be the center of attention, but there’s not this need for the world domination that you see now. And we’ve got ourselves into this pickle and I don’t see the Democrats and the progressives offering candidates that are really going to get us out of it. At least on the presidential level. On the local level, yes, that’s why I’m shifting my focus somewhat, I think we could help rebuild at the local level. How do we care for our neighbor? There’s a difference between Trump and MAGA, and I make that distinction. And where we go from here, I’m not gonna be a politician, I’m not gonna be a fortune teller, but that’s why I didn’t make it Trump specific because this is gonna continue when he’s gone. MAGA is gonna be here. And there are also ardent progressives.

And I think it would help to look at what were legitimate concerns that people had the progressives ignored. And that’s the beginning of a step of healing is to look at that component. Like how many women who were MAHA, they just wanted alternative treatments for their kids. A lot of them, they were not full blown MAGA, but all of sudden they felt the Big Pharma was telling them how to rule their lives.

The Big Pharma was calling them idiots or education was calling them idiots for wanting to homeschool their kids. They wanted to do alternative things that were legal and justified and they were not allowed to do it. You know, women were trying to give their little kid who has epilepsy, giving him CBD and discovering it worked and then being told they couldn’t give it. They had to give the kid pharma drug that A, they couldn’t afford and B, cause their kid to be sick. What would have happened if the women who were interested in natural health had been taken more seriously, would they have gone full blown? So you always have to think of what could you have done? Were you so full of your own hubris and your own self-righteousness that you didn’t listen to what other people were asking and demanding? And I think that’s where I’m seeing the progressive movement is, is are they willing to listen to alternative views?

There’s a large group of people that I think are dissatisfied with everything. What are they going to do about that dissatisfaction? Where can they put that?

Ruth Perry (28:17)
So what is it narcissistic personalities that both woo and wound people?

Becky (28:23)
I would call it the Jekyll-Hyde syndrome. They can be incredibly charismatic. They’re also very tuned into when you’re vulnerable. You see this with certain rather nefarious dating coaches is I will give you what you’re looking for. You’re looking for women empowerment. You’re looking to explore your female sexuality. You’re looking to do better your business. You’re looking to be a better mother. Whatever you are looking for that you’re not finding, they have the answer. And they will just love bomb you to bits. They will give you everything you want. And to the point where you don’t realize how much money you’re spending, how much time you’re spending, because you’re getting that fix. You’re getting that high. You’re getting that adrenaline rush, that oxycutin. You’re getting that, ooh, that dopamine hit. It feels so good to finally be recognized, especially if you come from a background where you haven’t been recognized.

And then the moment, the nanosecond, you disagree. The moment you say, I can’t afford to pay it this month, I need to take some time for myself, I need to step back a little bit. Whatever, you have just drained them of their narcissistic supply. The moment you cut it off, they will turn into to Mr. Hyde and do what is called narcissistic collapse. They will go completely irrational. I think for a lot of us, we do get disappointed. If someone cancels on you last minute, you’re going to be disappointed. But that’s different than someone going completely ballistic. It’s someone saying, I’m disappointed that we’re not making this projections right. What can we do to make this better versus I’m disappointed in you for failing?

After you have a narcissistic collapse hit you, you sit there going what the hell just happened? It’s not as simple like I need to have a talk with you about your work performance or we need to discuss you being a bit cleaner or bit whatever. It’s complete annihilation of you or all of sudden they get with a one out of you, you wrote those three articles I needed you to write to make me feel good, okay, bye, I’m gone. They took what they needed from you and then they left you. Just bye. And you’re starting going, what the hell just happened here? And their words don’t match their actions. And after a while, you start to find yourself going crazy, which is why I find it very helpful to identify the pattern because it keeps you from going crazy.

Now I can identify it and I go, okay, that person’s having narcissistic collapse. I’m going to treat him like a three year old, a toddler. Just walk away. I’m not going to engage. You cannot rationalize with a toddler. You cannot be reasonable. And if you give him his binky or his Nobel Peace Prize, it’s not going to solve anything. It’s a temporary, it’s like a pacifier situation. They’re going to continue to escalate. This is not going to stop until you walk away and then let them find somebody else. And over time, it starts to crumble. And that’s what you’re seeing now is the starting of the crumbling.

Maybe I’m too naive to think that, but I do believe, and I’m looking at the Epstein files to me as the beginning of a revelation of we’re finally starting to see a lot of stuff start to crumble. And that’s a good thing. I say, hallelujah.

Ruth Perry (31:14)
What is the connection to and sex abuse in these kind of high control groups?

Becky (31:20)
Because they can. I do not understand the attraction to children. I do not understand why any man would want to have a relationship with someone who’s not age appropriate. I don’t get it. And I think that some of it is these men do not want adult relationships. They want relationships they can control. Men have always wanted, some have wanted significant younger women, and there’s always women who are willing naive enough.

In the case of children, you start to tell a kid who comes from a very broken home who’s never had any kind of love. They’re so susceptible to being loved bombed. And all of a sudden they’ve never had anything. Wow, I got a couple hundred dollars just for doing this little act. Can’t be that bad. And then before they know it, they’ve been trafficked beyond their beliefs because they didn’t understand what was going on. They didn’t understand the dynamics. An older woman would walk into that and go, what the hell?

But then I’m dealing, like I’m looking into something, as you might have there was a UMC minister in Missouri and she the executive assistant and then the grounds manager for Epstein Island. claims she didn’t see anything. At the time she was studying to be a minister, as I understand And the UMC has suspended her pending investigation because they feel that her involvement this case went against the UMC’s code of ethics around treatment of women. Hallelujah for small victories. However, I’m very shocked that she claimed she saw nothing. I mean, you see the photos of the house. You didn’t think it was odd there was a dentist chair in there. You didn’t think it was odd there were photos of underage girls. There was like Lolita on steroids.

You’re a pastor and I don’t expect a pastor to be a complete intuitive, because we all have different personality types. But if you’re a pastor and you don’t think there’s something wrong with unaccompanied minors getting off of a plane to meet a group of old men, if your spidey sense doesn’t do anything and you claim you saw nothing, then you’re not qualified to be a minister because at a basic core. A minister needs to notice when something that serious is going on. I would expect a pastor to know that youth minister is getting a little too handsy. Yes, that volunteer is being inappropriate. If you can’t even see something as blatantly obvious as underage girls, unaccompanied often with a lot of older men, and you think this is just a pool party, you’re not qualified for ordained ministry.

And the fact that she got called out on it, I’m glad the UMC is doing the right thing. What no one has figured out is how did she meet I want to know how did a UMC minister from Missouri meet Jeffrey Epstein and get offered that job? So always interested in looking at the connections because Epstein has made some referrals. He referred Eric Metaxas’ book to somebody.

Ruth Perry (33:59)
Yeah.

Becky (34:02)
No, I take it back, Ken Starr referred Eric Metaxas’ book to him. And then there was an instance where he forwarded on Rick Warren’s newsletter. Well, okay, what is Ken Starr doing referring the book written by the guy who was one earliest Trump supporters? Eric Metaxas was supporting Trump before anybody else did, just about. So he was a key figure in helping Trump get elected. Why is Ken Barr recommending this Bonhoeffer book, the book is terrible. Every scholar said it’s terrible. Then you have other, references like that. Epstein recommended Dobson’s Dare to Discipline book to a young survivor who was having problems with her family. These are very evangelical books. How are they getting into that network? So far that’s the only Christian connection I’ve been able to find.

Deepak Chopra is another thing. He claims I didn’t do anything inappropriate. And you’re sitting here discussing how, you know, God is a construct, cute girls are real. And I would never go to a guru that said that. That is disgusting. I mean, that is just the way he’s discussing about girls. Like, did you bring me girls? Did you bring me girls? You’re a grown adult male who is responsible, thanks to Oprah in large part, for bringing in all of these concepts of the East to the West. Oprah basically, now that we’ve realized, was a walking show for predators. She gave us Dr. Phil, she gave us Dr. Oz, she gave us the anti-vax movement. She supported John of God. And if you Google John of God in Brazil, he is in jail bizarre medical experiments and pedophilia.

So I think we have to look at ourselves and why did we ever trust Oprah? She’s not trustworthy. Look at all the people she’s introduced us to. She never took any responsibility. She also introduced us to the secret of Dr. Lisa Rankin is someone that I would recommend your listeners check out. She’s one of the people that spoke on Deepak’s stage, one of the few people speaking out. All these people that stood and profited by being connected to Deepak have not spoken out. And yet she did. A few people are speaking out. There’s some outliers who are saying, I’m willing to risk my book contract. I’m willing to risk my speaking, my place on the center stage. I’m willing to do what needs to be done to make this right. Now, why they didn’t speak out before is another story, but they’re speaking out now. And I think this is similar to the Weinstein in the Cosby case. It takes a while to convince people that someone this powerful is this evil.

Ruth Perry (36:24)
I had a funny interaction. I met Eric Metaxas seven or eight years ago. I was homeschooling my children by day and waitressing by night. And I live in the vicinity of Liberty University. And he had a group of conservative influencers at dinner at the steakhouse. And they were there for some event at the Falkirk Center at Liberty. And after the dinner, Eric Metaxas was standing up and he asked me if I knew who he was. And I said, I do know who you are. And he said, that’s so nice. I’m going to let my wife know that you said that. What did I say?

Becky (36:57)
I interviewed him for The Door and this is before the Wilberforce book. He was anti post veggie tales, not quite the best selling author. And it was one of most worst interviews of my life. It’s just all the oxygen in the room was sucked out and he was incredibly full of himself.

But what I appreciate about that was that I could get it, I knew to stay away from it from get-go. It was the progressives. Like I was drawn in to Nadia Bolz Weber, Pete Rollins, that more progressive line of thought. And actually I endorsed some of their stuff in the beginning, because in the beginning it sounded really good. So then all of sudden the moment they became bestselling authors, or if not bestselling in the case of Rollins, the moment they got their little click going.

It was just all of a sudden, ooh, wow. I mean, they were just as obnoxious as Eric Metaxas, but in a slightly subtler way. And it can be really when someone writes something that you believe and then you meet them and you go, crap. And so I’m telling people, take what’s good. Okay, if they wrote something that you enjoy, acknowledge that. There’s nothing wrong with you for taking someone’s words and saying, that word’s really…

Move me but just know that person didn’t live out those teachings, you know and try to find people that did live out those teachings They exist. I mean Henri Nouwen, there was never anything about him and he’s someone that I continue to rely on yes, there were some abuses within the community for him, but it was after his death. He had nothing to do with that There are a lot of good spiritual thinkers that don’t engage in this. So the question is don’t kick yourself, but then look and say where can I find better fruit?

Where can I find fruit from people who like that? Which is why I continue to recommend Tia Leving. There’s a lot of people in the religious trauma field that I tell people, be careful. Similar to the recovery movement. There’s people out there wanting to make a name for themselves as deconstruction coaches, religious trauma coaches, whatever you want to help someone with their faith. And that’s why I say I’m a writer. I mean, have an MSW.

Actually clinical social work is going to be particular, but I’m not licensed right now and I am going to sell myself as a writer. I am not going to sell myself as a life coach. I’m gonna stay in my own lane, I’m gonna leave that up to qualified trauma therapists who are working currently in that field and I will provide the education to hopefully give people the awareness that yeah maybe that kind of help would be helpful for me. But there are, a lot of people out there trying to sell you their own shtick and there’s some really good solid voices. And it’s important to kind of distinguish between the two of them. And it takes a while. I mean, to me, one of the biggest things is do you get a sense of community around them? Do you get a sense of care?

Or it’s all about them and their accomplishments and what they can do and what their success rate And we’re kind of in this gray kind of new frontier. The research in the narcissism is only about 10 years old. You still have a lot of therapists that think religious trauma is BS. They don’t think that you get trauma from a religious experience. So there’s a lot of education that needs to happen. Similar to where I said where alcoholism was in the 1980s.

Ruth Perry (40:00)
I also had EMDR therapy because I realized been reading about religious trauma for a long and it didn’t ever occur to me that I had religious trauma. But then it kind of clicked in place after many years of like myself just trying to make sense of all the different things I had experienced in the church and often very painful and things and having that EMDR therapy was extremely helpful.

Becky (40:26)
Oh yeah, and it’s not the only form of therapy that could work. There are other somatic forms. There’s brain spotting, emotional isometrics, a lot of different treatments. And you find a therapist that works for you. How I chose my therapist for EMDR is I began to ask and see, did she really listen to me? Like I described to her that I didn’t want to get married. I didn’t want to have kids. And I was describing my relationship status and whatnot.

I look to see in her eyes, was she judging You know, is saying that whatever choices, if I make healthy legal lifestyle choices, those should be mine. Like if you want to legally choose to be a sex, if you want to become a sex worker, that’s your personal decision versus being coerced into something. So I’d say when you go to a therapist, how does that therapist treat you? Do you get any kind of a creepy vibe? Get the hell out of there.

Find another therapist. There’s plenty of therapists that do EMDR, that do somatic work. And a lot of that is for women. Your gut is such a good tool and we don’t use it. We kind of just say, I’m not feeling good. I’ll just go take some Pepto-Bismol. We don’t tune into why are you feeling that? No, don’t medicate that. Don’t drink it away. You don’t need a glass of wine to deal with this. Think of why you’re feeling this way.

And that tells you something isn’t quite right. Now, this therapist might be right for somebody else, but it’s not right for you. Not everything is narcissistic. But something just might not be right for you. The more you’re in tune with what you need and what you want, you’re not going to be coerced into just doing and going along with what everybody else says.

And you also don’t hear what the mean girls say, which for women, I think that’s something that we really need to focus on because a lot of the mean girls got ahead and those of us who weren’t mean girls didn’t get the job. But what I’m starting to realize now is they paid a price for getting that job. They have had to sacrifice their looks. I mean, we can make fun of Maro Lago face all we want, but those women had to subject whoever they are to so deep inside of them that it’s almost like there’s not a person there anymore. I don’t know if they were born that way, I don’t know a lot of their childhoods, but they’ve become an incredibly self-centered narcissistic person that can only think of themselves from their own lens of beauty. And they’re doing whatever they can do to maintain their place of power. That is clearly a narcissistic move. I don’t know how many of them started out that way.

I suspect it’s like my sister that they were told from a very young age, they’re beautiful. Were never told they were smart. Were never told they could do whatever they wanted to do. So they began to focus primarily on developing their looks. And as they got to be in their thirties and forties, it got even harsher. You know, they had to continue to maintain that persona.

Ruth Perry (43:02)
Well, your book is a very helpful guide, social commentary that you give and your insight and how well you understand what is going on and how well you describe all these terms mean. Narcissism, gaslighting, the echo chamber. There’s so many different things that you describe and explain and it seems like you’ve read a hundred books in the process of writing this book.

Becky (43:24)
Well, it helps to read all the research that’s out there. And in fact, a lot of the narcissism books, what I didn’t like about it was they were focusing on dating, or parenting, which I think is an important thing. But it was also having a black and white view. And I take a gray view, which is why I said, if something’s risen to the level of malignancy, like what I was finding in the U.S. Emergent Church world, then I feel it’s wrong to participate in that group’s activities because you’re supporting an abusive culture. But if someone is just a full blown self-centered narcissist, but yet you enjoy their comedy show, I we don’t evaluate musicians or actresses or we say we like the show. And I found that by looking at something like, okay, I like your show. It really changes how I feel because I’m not looking to form a community.

I’m looking to have an enjoyable evening enjoying the social lubricant because we all need some degree of social lubricant. We have a loneliness epidemic. But I’ve also learned it’s okay to be alone. It’s better to be alone than to be trying to get the approval of a narcissistic system, a narcissistic community. And I was one of these Uber volunteers. I love to help. And for me, just pulling back and saying, nope, not going to do it. That’s been life changing for me truly.

And you can find communities that care. I go to tasting rooms like Misara, this winery run by a Persian winemaker and have an incredibly connected experience. At Kristoff Farms, Nick Kristoff and his wife, they do cider and community building conversations through cider and their Pinot Noir wines. There ways, even though you can say, oh, this one aspect of the industry is very narcissistic and superficial and only cares about wine scores and who’s this and who’s that. There’s another side that’s really connective and really community and grounded in sustainability. And I tell people, my reporting, I look to do stuff that’s reporting on sustainability, community, spirituality. And I consciously look for things that have those elements. If they don’t have it, I might say, this is a nice evening. Nice dinner, nice glass of wine, nice music, nice show. But I’m not gonna expect that to be my community connective place. I’m gonna go to those community connective places that really care about me. And it’s life changing once you can learn to make that shift. And I wish the best for everybody. But take care of yourself, for your friend and find other people.

There are other people like you. This is emerging as more and more of us start to come to these awarenesses. We’re finding other support groups. Tons of podcasts. I’ve been on a number of them and you know, there’s a lot of conversations happening, how to find authenticity. I think people are searching for that in this world. And I don’t think you can find it at the national level, but I think you can find it at the grassroots level.

Ruth Perry (46:02)
Thank you so much for all the work you’ve done to be a guide to others into this more hopeful and healthy way to live. Where is the best place for people to find you online and find your work?

Becky (46:12)
Well, it’s available to any online, most online retailers. My sub stack is, you Google Becky Garrison or Gaslighting for God. It’s my sub stack. That’s where I post a number of pieces. I also have a Facebook author page, Becky Garrison writer, and then an Instagram is Becky underscore Garrison. I’m also on LinkedIn as Becky Garrison and there’s a YouTube channel. So, but I don’t use the latter two that frequently. I’m also moving more and more towards Substack because I find out can have more substantial conversations there. The noise in Meta Universe is just not helpful and I’m not going to pay to play with Mark Zuckerberg. He does not deserve my money.

Ruth Perry (46:49)
Well thank you so much for being here today Becky. Would you like to have the last word before we sign off?

Becky (46:53)
No, well, just thank you for the work that you’re doing as well. I have not lost my optimism that first drew me to narcissistic energies. I just am now being far more discerning. I would say to them, be an optimist, but also be a discerning optimist, not a naive.

Ruth Perry (47:09)
Alright, thank you so much. God bless, Becky.

Becky (47:11)
You too, thank you so much.


Did you enjoy this episode? Please subscribe, rate or review us on YouTubeSpotifyApple PodcastsAmazon MusicSubstack, and more! Your support means the world. God bless!

011 I Kathy Escobar on Reimagining Faith for a New Day

You can find Kathy Escobar’s books on Amazon: https://amzn.to/4kBXsG4 or on her website, KathyEscobar.com

I’m so delighted to share this conversation that I had with Kathy Escobar, writer, pastor, advocate, speaker and spiritual director. You can find out more about Kathy’s work at KathyEscobar.com and find all of her books here.

I read her book in 2016 and shared a review here on the blog exactly ten years ago. As I prepared to interview Kathy, I remembered the trend going around right now of sharing pictures of ourselves in 2016 and reflecting on how much we and our world have changed in that time. We’ve been through a lot, my friends. Kathy’s book, “Faith Shift”, is as relevant today as it was to me ten years ago, as I was grappling with the cognitive dissonance of spiritual trauma and deconstructing my conservative Baptist upbringing. We talk through all the stages of a faith shift together in this episode: Fusing, Shifting, Returning, Unraveling, Severing and Rebuilding (or Reimagining, if she could write it again today.) We talked about co-dependency and being a “Good Christian Woman” vs. an “Ex Good Christian Woman,” which I blogged about in 2015 here. We talked about embodiment and activism and finding church and ministry outside of evangelicalsm. It was such a fun conversation, and I know you’ll get a lot from it!

You can listen to our episode together on The Beautiful Kingdom Builders Podcast on YouTubeSpotifyApple PodcastsAmazon Music, or more! If you find our conversation helpful, please share it with a friend, rate and review, and subscribe so you never miss an episode!

TRANSCRIPT:

Ruth Perry (00:15)
My guest today is Kathy Escobar, a pastor, writer, advocate, speaker, and spiritual director. And on her website, she describes herself as a community cultivator and change catalyzer who believes in the power of human connection and that healthier people make healthier families, communities, and systems. Welcome, Kathy. Thank you for being here today.

Kathy Escobar (00:36)
it’s so fun. I’m so glad we get to hang out.

Ruth Perry (00:39)
You’ve written many beautiful books, but I wanted to bring you on to talk about this book, Faith Shift. I read this 10 years ago, And on the cover it has a blurb from Rachel Held Evans saying, “Faith Shift is a must read for every doubter, misfit or dreamer who has ever felt alone in the church.” And that was definitely me 10 years ago. And so I’m so grateful that I found your book and I’m grateful that here today.

And just thinking about how 10 years ago was 2016 and there’s that trend right now, people sharing pictures of themselves in 2016 and reflecting on how much the world has changed in one decade because we’ve seen the rise of MAGA and Christian nationalism and the Black Lives Matter movement and the Me Too movement. We’ve seen the erosion of our democracy and civil rights and now the scapegoating and oppression of immigrants and covering up the Epstein files. I mean, just so much for 10 years. so, And the church has just hemorrhaged people. I think people have been questioning their faith and walking away from their faith communities.

Kathy Escobar (01:36)
It’s a lot. It’s a lot.

Ruth Perry (01:46)
I think this last 10 years is a really important time for us to reflect on. And so first of all, I want to say kudos to you for writing such an important book.

Kathy Escobar (01:55)
I have to say like just you reading Rachel’s cover quote, it gave me chills. it is so, so special that we were connected all those years ago. And honestly, I attribute a lot of what happened with Faith Shift to Rachel and her support for the process and the book, but just more than anything, the process. I mean, that’s really what the material was about. And it is interesting because it’s 12 years now and then 10 years of kind of really this 2016 and 2026. a lot’s happened. And it’s interesting how it is more timeless than I thought.

Because you know, I knew when I wrote it there were people that were already, way past they had unraveled and were rebuilding and reimagining and then there are people just entering in the story and then that people would be entering into the story a few years later, but now we’re 12 years later and then there’s brand new people because of the way things have ramped up and I am so glad I would change a few things in there, very few on the whole.

The I really still stand behind, but I think what I love is that people can at least find some kindredness because it’s a hard process. And right now with so many people going, I can’t do this anymore. Like that was a few calls this morning of just setting up meetings. Like I’m done. I can’t go anymore. I can’t be part anymore. And just people wanting some support for that so that we’re not struggling so much through the because there’s a long line. You’re one of them who have done that work, you know, and now we’re here to hold the container for other people. And I’m glad that there is way more support now in 2026 than there was in 2014.

Ruth Perry (03:42)
When I came to your book, I was in a really broken place because my home church had gone through a split and my dad had been the senior pastor and my brother had been his associate pastor. And everybody in the church was like family to me. I just never could have imagined that they would treat us the way we were treated and the things that we experienced, it was really traumatic on multiple levels. And so I was reeling from that.

And then also, I had grown up complementarian and then God called me to be a pastor in 2010 when I was pregnant with my third child. And so I was going through all the cognitive dissonance of trying to figure that out. And so my faith was just really, you describe it as spiritual vertigo in your book. And that was exactly how I was feeling. It was a really, really painful season. And so when I came to your blog, and was reading your posts and then I discovered you had a book and I ordered this. It was like finding balm in Gilead. You gave me language and insight that helped me understand the season I was in and that helped me to persevere and make it through. And so just thank you from the bottom of my heart to you personally for that. And I do hope more people read your book.

Kathy Escobar (04:53)
That means so much and that’s exactly why I wrote it right there. always it was just like may it get into the hands of the people that need it the most and and just find ourselves in the story and that was always you know the language in there I kind of do have these movements of a faith shift and evolution of faith But it was like change the words change the way that change how it looks it doesn’t matter Just grab what you need for your story that’s gonna help you

Ruth Perry (05:22)
Before we talk about the book, can you tell us a little bit about your own personal faith background?

Kathy Escobar (05:27)
Yeah, so I was not raised in church and so that’s an interesting part because like I know what it was like before kind of going in on the system and so my family, my dad was a hippie in Northern California. My mom had gone through one marriage and married my dad and left him and so our whole our whole house was kind of I’d say super spiritual but not religious and so I would go to a Catholic church with my grandparents when I was visiting them and that was sweet but I was super lost and didn’t understand anything that was happening but somewhere along the line someone invited me to Vacation Bible School and I went and I was always hungry for spiritual connection always.

So I went and I prayed the prayer, didn’t do anything. You know, I didn’t have any structures. Then somewhere along the line, someone gave me this little white Bible. And I still have it in my memento box. And they just were like, read this and read John. And I don’t remember my exact age, but I was an avid reader really young. And it was probably late elementary, early middle school. And I was just super drawn to Jesus. I was. I thought Jesus was super cool. I loved that it was all the outcasts and the lepers and that part of it really I was drawn in and my family had a lot of chaos and so I felt that connection. I did. There was something about it.

So it was pretty pure, is the bottom line because I didn’t go to church. So I wasn’t systemized at It was real and I have a lot of journals like Dear God and Dear Jesus and I just was kind of kind like that Judy Blume book. You know, I was just reaching out for connection. And so I did end up going to an evangelical church in my high school years with my boyfriend at the time. Something did kind of happen. I just was more hungry for it. And that was kind of the entry into evangelicalism and so just started to go more started to listen to what they said and so.

For me, my background became being part of mainly evangelical churches, Calvary chapels. We went to the Vineyard for a little bit, those sort of attractional churches that were in the evangelical stream where women didn’t teach and lead, but it was like really fun to be part of. There was a lot of whiz bang and there was this thing happening of this is a way you can live your life. And I was really drawn to it because I didn’t have a lot of boundaries or I didn’t really have any certainty in my family. And I did feel a security in that system. So I was in that system for a chunk of years. I always kind of pushed against it because I went to Pepperdine University for my undergrad and I was one of the poorest people there. I drove up in my Datsun B210 1976. You know, there’s Ferraris and Mercedes and BMWs.

And I didn’t really get the Church of Christ thing because I wasn’t church, you know, I didn’t really get it. And then the girls in my Bible class were crying and saying, it’s so terrible, I can’t serve communion, they won’t let me do this, I can’t serve communion. I was looking at them going like, what’s your problem? Why are you there if they’re not letting you serve communion? And the irony is just probably about four or five years later, I was in churches like that with my husband.

Really there and that is strange thing for me. And so I always describe like a funnel, but there’s a funnel on both sides and one is like going up into the tightness of a funnel, like the base. And so I was in that system for a chunk of years, but it’s kind of always like pressing out on it. And then a big piece was bumping up into all kinds of things, primarily related to women, the LGBT community, the inerrancy of the Bible, things that just didn’t make sense to me. the system was saying, but this is what it says. And this is, you just don’t know cause you’re young in your faith. And I questioned myself.

I didn’t have some security, but I kept growing up. And when everything came apart for me, it was really was in 2006. I really describe it as the funnel out in now it’s this many years later. 20 years later and my funnel is way out. And I’m so glad and then I still have good things that are left and that’s the piece of Faith Shift is that there’s a way to reimagine and pursue a faith that has those values of mystery and diversity and freedom but the systems are just so terrible at helping us with that. So that’s kind of my background.

I am an ex-vangelical for sure but I’m not whereI grew up, you know, I kind of have this different foundation now, but it is wide and expansive and I’m so grateful I got out.

Ruth Perry (10:20)
In your first chapter in Faith Shift, you wrote, “Most Christians are taught that faith is defined by an event, salvation. After we get saved, we turn our energies to keeping faith, growing it, spreading it. The truth is growth and change are natural parts of our relationship with God. God invites us to be in motion, but often the faith systems we are a part of don’t. Our changes can feel threatening to those who are used to believing and behaving a particular way. A faith shift, what often feels like a failure or an end can actually be a doorway to something more, something bigger and truer.” That’s from chapter one, you titled, You’re Not Crazy, You’re Not Alone, which was excellent. So you had gone through that process, then of faith shifting that brought you to write this book. And who were you picturing as your readers?

Kathy Escobar (11:00)
Yeah. Well, I think the readers were the people that I was around circles with here in Denver. There was just this little covert group of people. A lot of them were in ministry, not everybody, and that were just asking these really good questions together. And we would sit here in the backyard around campfires and coffee shops and over dinner and just really talk about what we didn’t hold on to anymore. What does that mean?

And kind of this idea, I wrote a post about spiritual Jenga, if you start taking out core things that people said, you have to have, will the whole thing come down? So those kinds of things, and what does it mean if the whole thing comes down? What does it mean for my kids? What does it mean for myself? I put a lot into it. There’s a ton of grief related to these changes because we have lived a certain way. I had a lot built in my identity as a really good Christian and certainty, you know, in faith shift, I think we’ll probably talk a little bit more about those movements, but you know, in that fusing, like that initial thing of certainty and conformity and belonging and affiliate, like those things are so strong.

And so when they start to come apart, like who are we? And so that was really the people that were part of The Refuge community at the very beginning were huge. And also you started with Rachel’s quote is that I started writing in 2007. I started looking up stuff in 2006 when The Refuge started. We’re getting ready to have our 20 year birthday in April. And in 2006 and seven, I started meeting some other people in other places. We’re still friends and everybody has had a huge faith deconstruction and is I mean life in new ways. But we were connecting around the United States. I mean that’s how I met Rachel was writing and I met her in real life and we became friends and there were so many of us in that stream. And so by 2014, It was just a lot of people resonating with the same things.

There were lot of things out of the themes were always the same. And it was always, I used to be here. It’s not resonating anymore. What is available to me? Like is there life on the other side or is that part of my life completely done? And honestly, it feels so disorienting. That was the biggest theme by far was the disorientation of losing the things that we once had. And I think that ⁓ a piece of the conversations were always, I framed it in faith shift this way, but it was always what we were talking about is that’s when we lose our beliefs, then we lose the structures that support those beliefs, then we lose the relationships that are in those structures, and then we lose our identity.

And so that’s what everyone was talking about. Who am I now? And is it okay? Am I going to be okay? Was a huge piece. Am I going to be okay? Especially people, I didn’t have it as strong because I was in evangelicalism, but I wasn’t in fundamentalism. And so there were a lot of things about what’s going to happen to me eternally if I walk away from all those belief systems, am I going to burn in hell for the rest of my life? Like I told people they would. And you know, those kinds of things were really, really deep. And then I had more of the, who am I without it? Because I did get a lot out of that system. And, and some a lot of fear of just, what do I, if you don’t believe this, then what do you believe? And so that was a big piece of my process.

Ruth Perry (14:35)
Yeah. Yeah, your book, you name each of those stages. And if you don’t mind walking through the stages again and give us the name and then what’s going on in each stage of a faith shift.

Kathy Escobar (15:04)
Yeah, I’m glad to do that. And so, infusing, infusing is like our start.

It’s just our start and our start looks different. Mine was, when I was a kid, but it wasn’t born with it. Some people started with it in the womb. Some people were 30, you know, wherever it was, but it is that desire for the core values. There are certainty and conformity and affiliation. So like truth, knowing what this is, this kind of conforming to the norms of the group and then being part of something, what it feels like to be part. Most people all have that. That’s just part of it. But some people stay there.

I would say most people do probably go through a little bit of shifting and I describe that as a like wavy line where you just start to question some things. like hmm. It’s when you’re sitting in church and you’re like why are we singing that song? Could I be doing something better with my time? Is this what Jesus wanted? I don’t know if I agree with that thing the pastor just said that doesn’t make sense in real life or they’re talking about my kid right now when they’re talking about LGBT stuff, whatever it is it’s like rumbly is how I describe shifting and what happens is, I think a lot of people fuse and a lot of people rumble.

And then a stage in there of returning kind of just like an arrow back over, like, I don’t know, but I don’t have anywhere else to go. It’s familiar to me, it’s comfortable enough, whatever. And I think there’s a lot in that cycle of fusing, shifting, returning, and just kind of staying there. Then there’s some of us, where you’re definitely one, I’m definitely one, a lot of people listening, I’m sure are too.

The biggest thing on shifting, it’s in our control. It’s in our control. A lot of us hit a place where it’s no longer in our control. a bridge too far. It is too big of a violation in our core values. something that happens in our life. A lot of people I know, their faith shift started when they got divorced and how the church responded to them. In my situation, I had a traumatic event as a leader where horrible power things were revealed like Oz. It was like the curtain and it was so bad. It was just terrible. And I couldn’t not look at it. I could not close the curtain. That I would say is when we hit the next three, which all faith deconstructors really probably connect with the most. And that is unraveling. And it’s a free fall down, man. is not shifting does not describe it.

And we kind of struggle with the faith shift language a little bit, like that it wasn’t strong enough, you know, for what happened. But it is because it’s all a big shift in our lives and a transition. But unraveling is when it just really gets out of our control. And that’s what happened to me. Like once I saw I saw the inequity, I saw the terrible things that were being said about people on the margins. I saw consolidated power. Saw God card getting played all the time. I couldn’t unsee it. I couldn’t un-feel it. And it’s just like a free fall down. And in unraveling is a desire for uncertainty, authenticity, and autonomy.

Because it’s like, gotta figure out what I need and no one’s gonna tell me anymore. You know, those kinds of things. And in there, in unraveling, big, big ball of grief. And I already said the four things when we lose those beliefs and then structures, relationships and identity. It’s just unraveling. It’s just a bunch of grief. And then the bottom one, which when we were working on the project, my editors and I, and I never forget this conversation. We were trying to come up with different words about severing because the truth is some people really walk away from it all like they really do. I never fully severed. So when I kind of looked at the Faith Shift, Faith Evolution model I say to people, it’s on a napkin. It’s not the whole cross the bridge to Jesus thing. It’s a totally different model, but it is something you could just draw it your own way. I drew it this way to give a visual for it.

And so at the bottom is severing like people really do have to leave emotionally. And that’s where atheism, agnosticism and the one that I always leave room for is a true break from the old toxic system. And you need to detox and especially when you’re in spiritually abusive systems, you can’t just go to something new. It’s a spiritual bypass. You’re not going to make it. So you have to like cut and cleanse. And some people sever forever. And the part with the book was really leaving room for that. It’s very controversial. It’s not to me, because I see people do just fine if they sever. But there are people that want to rebuild or reimagine something else.

And so I will say a chunk of years now, I changed the language that’s in Faith Shift from rebuilding to reimagining. Whenever I’m with a group on this, I would use reimagine now instead of rebuilding because rebuilding was fine for then, but so much has changed and building something is also a lot of resistance to that for good reason. You’re just building something else that has to come down. But reimagining, really resonates and in reimagining it’s just like a bunch of like squiggly lines. And it’s not back here it’s like this way it’s forward and it’s squiggly and it’s messy and it’s up and down and all around but it’s a search the core values that guide reimagining slash rebuilding are a desire for greater mystery freedom and diversity in all the things so it’s a wider everything.

The thing I want to say about my editors is that when we were in the room workshopping this, they kept wanting to have an infinity model. And it didn’t leave room for severing and people don’t go back there. Like it doesn’t flow that way. And it was funny. We went round and round and I just kept saying, no, it doesn’t resonate with me or the people that I journey with. And then they finally throw their pens down. They’re like, okay, we’re really off on this, aren’t we? And I was like, yeah, I think so. I do. Because it’s just not people’s experiences.

And I’ve had multiple people tell me that if severing, wasn’t on there, they would have thrown the book away. They would have thrown the book away. They would have got that far and people need permission in themselves. They don’t need permission from me. They need permission in themselves to let that be and find out who we are separated from the system. I never fully separated my story because of The Refuge and we started it and I had a place to do stuff. So I came close, I thought about it, but I had the luxury kind of of being around a bunch of other people, reimagining together. But there’s so many that need that and I think that that’s the problem when we try and go well you’re just going through a faith and you’ll come back around and that’s just not how this works in most cases when we really unravel.

Ruth Perry (22:06)
I feel like I did sever, even though I’ve always maintained my relationships and my faith. I’ve reimagined it, but I severed from the need to people please. I had to sever from the codependency of the toxic system that I was in, especially in my closest relationships, where I had to learn that I had to have integrity and authenticity in doing what I felt was right, not doing what other people expected of me. And so in that way, I felt like the severing language was really impactful for me.

Kathy Escobar (22:32)
Yeah. I’m so glad. I’m so glad and it’s brave and it’s hard, but it’s so healthy. Like it is so healthy to detach and sever from toxic things. Like that’s not a stretch in the world.

Ruth Perry (22:50)
Yeah, that’s my next question for you actually is How, when people start rebuilding or reimagining their faith and going through this process, what do you see is healthier in their life than before?

Kathy Escobar (23:01)
Well, I always say this, I mean, and this is a bad stat, but in my experience, and I can say this because I can line up every single person I know, 100 % of the time, people are healthier and more free. And it’s one of my deep sadnesses, to be honest, because I’m mainly in the Christian tradition. And so for that many people spending that much time in that system, there should be a lot more freedom.

And so to have to go through this whole process of untangling for so many things to become a healthier, more freer person is very sad. What I’ve seen on the whole is people just really learn how to live more true to their truest true, which one of the worst toxic theology things that’s taught in my opinion is that, our heart is wicked above all things, that we can’t trust you’re nothing apart from Jesus.

You know that God is in control of everything and you’ve got to find your way into God’s will or if you’re out if anything bad in your life, then it’s not in alignment with God somehow. It’s so much power and control. And so it is healthy to leave those kinds of toxic abusive relationships. I think the health that I see is as we learn how to tell the truth more. We learn how to not be split. Like we’re not one thing on the inside that we’re like, and then outside we’re pretending like we’re doing fine because we just don’t have a safe place to be authentic.

So I think health is healing the split and everyone becomes more whole. I think the other piece is actually listening to our bodies. So a huge piece of evangelical fundamentalist Christianity is disembodiment and just being cut off from our bodies and that was a huge thing for me and so I couldn’t even tell you like what am I feeling?

What’s my feeling? I don’t know. I don’t even know because you have to find that feeling in your body. It’s not a head thing. You feel and where do you feel it in your body and just really being disconnected. And so I think what happens in the spaces of mystery and in the spaces of freedom to explore different spiritual practices, what works and doesn’t work instead of having to like buy into all of it. And freedom, like people really settle in to become healthier.

And I just feel it makes me want to cry because I, last night at our house of refuge, I’ve known some of those people since the beginning of The Refuge. And we’re still here meeting in our house. This is one piece of the work of The Refuge still is house of refuge. It’s every other Wednesday night at Collective Spiritual Conversations and I can’t even tell you the healing. It’s crazy what happened when everybody got out of the thing that they were so dedicated to. And it doesn’t mean there’s not still realities of mental health. There’s not still realities of struggles in this world. Nothing’s resolved because it’s the human experience. But it’s like everyone is not carrying that burden on top of those things anymore. And it’s so fun to see. I am amazed at something that has so much money and so much time and so much energy and so much culture and all those things just does not produce health. That’s what it is. It just doesn’t produce that many healthy people. And that’s a shame. That’s a shame.

It really is because it’s a lot of opportunity to put in really good stuff for people. The stuff that we really need and that is how to be more whole and authentic and secure and free and use your gifts freely and follow the deepest desires of your heart for the greater good in the world without control, someone controlling that. So there’s my long answer to that question.

Ruth Perry (26:36)
Yeah. I think between being a codependent people pleaser and just absorbing everybody else’s needs and then on top of that having the same disembodiment issue, I know that my work is embodiment healing that I need to do. So what do you recommend? Where do I start?

Kathy Escobar (27:20)
My gosh, well you know one thing is my friend Janelle Absramsey, she’s edited and written in a few different books. She’s a good friend of mine. We actually met through Faith Shift. She came to a Faith Shift processing party that we had. I did some of those in the early days just creating space to kind of walk through. We met there and she’s now the co-director of Brew Theology in Denver. And she just came to, we have a group at The Refuge called Reimagine on Sunday night, first Sunday night of the month, virtually. It’s one of our only like wide ⁓ on the weekend virtual groups. And it came out of a desire, honestly, our first year was related to church burnouts and freedom seekers and people that were just desiring something different. And then this last year we switched a little bit more to practical and soulful resourcing to navigate these turbulent times because what’s happening in the wider story right now in 2026. It’s been happening for 10 years, but it really has been happening long before that, but it’s illuminated the Christian nationalism thing, the double down, the misogyny.

It’s so deep and it really is rattling. Even people who have been in a pretty good place over the years just feel that wound opened and then new people feeling the wound and finding out. So Reimagine is about that like resourcing. So she came and she had a whole thing on embodiment and it was so good. I can send you at least the PDF because it has a bunch of resources and I think you would really, I think you’d really connect and she’s a pastor, a piece of the story. It’s okay for me to say this. Our multi-faith group that I’m part of, she joined, I’ve been part for 15 years, she joined a chunk of years ago after not being able to be ordained in the denomination that she grew up in. We ordained her.

It was incredible. It was so beautiful. There were like seven faiths. We had a beautiful service. I was part of helping curate it. And it was really one of the holiest things because she’s an incredible pastor. She’s an incredible pastor and we ordained her.

Ruth Perry (29:17)
Beautiful.

Kathy Escobar (29:33)
I knew it was one of the coolest multi-faith things that we did. We do a lot of cool things, but that was like way up in the books of one of the coolest things that we’ve done together in the time that I’ve been there.

Ruth Perry (29:43)
Yeah, patriarchy is pretty insidious in a lot of the church. And so that was one of the things that I really appreciated in your blog, I think more than your book. I don’t remember from the book if you addressed it as much, but in your blog, I really loved your post, Good Christian Woman versus Ex-Good Christian Woman. And I think I shared it with hundreds of people probably at the time. And so I just thought I would read

Kathy Escobar (30:08)
That was a long time ago, yeah.

Ruth Perry (30:11)
You made this bullet list of qualities of a good Christian woman. You said they:
rarely engage in conflict,
are terrible at saying no because it feels selfish,
know how to say the right things, do the right things to keep the peace,
continually strive, and I do mean strive, to be a better wife, better mother, better Christian,
live with a feeling that God is disappointed with us somehow.
feel a lot of shame for who we are and who we aren’t, but rarely say it out loud.
doubt our leadership, feelings, gifts, dreams.
dwell on the things we should be doing differently or better.
view anger as sin and always seek permission.
That’s so heavy.

Kathy Escobar (30:49)
It’s a lot. I love that post though. And you know what? It is one of my top posts ever. And that was from like, what year was that? It was a long time ago.

Ruth Perry (30:59)
Yeah, well, it probably was in 2014 or 2016 or so when I was reading your book, I’m guessing. And then you provided a better list. Ex-good Christian women are:
learning to show up in relationship instead of hiding,
engage in conflict instead of avoid it,
say no with less and less guilt and say yes more freely, more honestly,
tell the truth,
respect anger
are honest about shame,
live in the present,
are beginning to believe we are enough here and now,
open ourselves up to dreams and passions and living out what God is stirring up in us,
lead and love and live in all kinds of new ways with or without permission,
are discovering that God is much bigger than we were ever taught and loves us more than we ever knew.
What a much more beautiful picture of Christian womanhood, huh?

Kathy Escobar (31:52)
And honestly as you read those like so much is in there on embodiment honestly. Embodiment really is just being like that living through us. And so our being connected to the deepest parts of our soul and our bodies and like one thing instead of a bunch of fragmented things. That really is what to me embodiment is. And then moving in the world that way, showing up in rooms that way. Our back straight and our head held high, which is so hard when we were taught to just be up space, saying what we want and what we need. So like that to me is all embodiment. And so I love that list. I do still love it after all these years.

Ruth Perry (32:38)
How does a performance-based faith, like our early faith stage, create codependency in us, do you think?

Kathy Escobar (32:45)
Well, I have a lot of things written about our codependent relationship with God. so, the truth is, mean, honestly, it is kind of a setup because in codependence, you’re always striving to kind of be okay. That’s ultimately what it is. The definition for me for codependence is any pattern or anything that we do that makes us be okay. And when we don’t do it, we’re not okay.

And so, those basically have, you know, shame and self-worth and compliance and avoidance and control, like all these ways that we try and be okay. So, performance-based with God is pretty simple in those systems that you’re, talking about that a lot of people listening probably were part of. It’s just really is performance-based.

You’re evaluated for how you say things. You’re evaluated for what you look like. You’re evaluated for how you serve God. My whole thing is you just say a lot of God things, people think that it’s awesome. I was like, throwing in Bible verses does not mean anything. But to even the Christian world, they’re like, ⁓ that person you can trust, even though their life is not indicative of those Bible verses.

We value those kinds of things. And so I think that performance and then you really put in, economic security. There’s a lot of things that the lie of white supremacy, Christian supremacy, Bible supremacy, male supremacy, like those lies are really deep in us and they’re a huge part. And so in relationship with God, when we’re taught that we are okay if we do these things, if we believe these things or if we behave this way, whatever that looks like, it creates this cycle and I was in one for sure, because I am an adult child of an alcoholic, I know co-dependence. I still go to meetings, the Refuge House, the Refuge Recovery meeting twice a month, and it’s a great meeting because we’re all just trying to be healthier humans. That’s really what we’re trying to do.

But in my God season, it was just never feeling like I was enough, which is what most co-dependents feel. Never feeling like if I said the truth, what does that say about my faith? And then I’m in a less standing with God. And then constant trying to make sure that I’m proving my worth in the world.

First to God and then to other people. And so it is just a vicious cycle. And honestly, it’s an addiction. The way to break out of codependency is similar to other addictions. And it really takes being honest about these things and saying it’s not working. And when I look at it now, I mean, it’s so many years later, but it’s really sad, the setup with God.

To be in this constant cycle. It is an abusive relationship, the way that the theological constructs that people taught us about God and then the setup of what it meant to be part of that system. And so honestly, it’s like untangling from an abusive relationship. And I know that’s not on God. That’s not on God. That is on the people that taught us that. And so I do think it’s confusing because the people get so merged with who, with God.

They’re all tangled up and they were claiming God. And I think that was a big piece of the work for me was really trying to separate out. Like even though I was taught these things doesn’t mean that that’s who God is. And there are now especially being out of the system for 20 years this year. I can say it’s amazing to be in the multi-faith space and the inter spiritual so many different things progressive Christian like it doesn’t matter like across, there’s just a lot more out there than that very narrow system and I’m in awe all the time about that and how sad it is that we just have put God in the most narrow thing and then said this is the only way and you are measured against this standard.

Ruth Perry (36:50)
Yeah. And the certainty piece too of the early stage where we see everything so concretely one way or another. And is it growing to be a problem where if you start to feel a little dissonant about one little thing. Now, if you bring that up, you almost get ejected immediately, like written off. There is so much more control in these groups about who belongs, who’s in and who’s out. And so part of it too is they’re like forcing people into their faith shift, maybe a little prematurely at times, because they’re like, I’ve been ejected.

Kathy Escobar (37:23)
I know, I think you’re right, I do. I think now, when I talk to people, I’m like, do you like being there? Well, yeah, I do like being there. And like, but I’m troubled about this. And so just the best way to test it is just to see what happens when you ask a question and you push against or you disagree. That’s how you test what a system is made of.

And I have people that systems have done just fine, honestly, because healthy systems and they can do it. They might not love it, but those do tend to be more progressive, inclusive communities that can hold a much wider breadth of the mystery of faith and don’t have really strict doctrinal statements. They might say what they believe, but it’s just got a lot of room in it. And then I’ve had others, you know, they just, it was awful.

And so, and sometimes what’s hard is like, some people like get forced out by the system, but way more get forced out by just going, I can’t do this anymore. And then what happens is they stop going and no one cared, no one cared. And that is a very sad thing. I hear that story a lot. They just were like, I stopped going, no one cared. Or I said I couldn’t go anymore because my kid’s gay and I’m not gonna go to this church anymore that believes something different. It’s not right for me. I’m just using that one example. And then just nobody cares. I mean, it’s just that simple. The wheels of the machine just keep going and no one misses them. And you know, it’s just that I think it’s both ways. Like you have the system goes, you know what, if you believe that this is not a place for you. And you’re wrong.

And there’s just so many degrees of how the system sucks. I mean, basically, that’s kind of where I land. The system just sucks at nuance and it sucks at good transitions. Like it doesn’t know how to go, gosh, we honor that. This isn’t the place for that, but we honor that. How can we end something well? How can we celebrate what you’ve done here? It just never does it. Everyone just ends out on the outs of the system for the most part. I don’t have that many good stories of good transitions out.

Ruth Perry (39:47)
Something I’ve noticed, maybe you’ve noticed this too, is because my background was evangelical and we kind of got ejected when the church split. So we started going to evangelical churches further and further and further away. We eventually after a few years of doing this, we landed in a church, and it was great. But looking back, I can’t believe that I never, tried the Methodist Church in town or the Episcopal Church in town. I was just so in this, I gotta go to an evangelical church because they’re the true Christians. And I mean, that was years and years and years. And I’m finally now for two and a half years, I’ve been a clergy person in the United Methodist Church. But they invited me, I never reached out to them. I was still looking at evangelical churches. So what is that about? What do you think that is, Kathy?

Kathy Escobar (40:17)
Yeah. Love it. Yes. My gosh, I think because I totally agree with you. I love the Methodist Church. There’s different ones but ones that really like made it through this split that they had. And the Episcopal Church and I have a lot of UCC friends like the DOC. There’s some great denominations that I would agree with you. I knew they existed. I didn’t think that they were worth connecting to because I was taught that they weren’t the true believers basically.

I mean that was said overtly and in all the culture and this is where the real juice of Jesus is and so I just think that the mainline churches have so much good. I can see in the justice space, because I’m in the justice space here in lots of ways, in activism, like, I’m telling you, the main lines are out there. The multi-faith are out there in the streets across all faiths. And they all have their own, you know, degrees of progressivism and conservatism, but just tend to be so much more action and faith in action than evangelicalism.

And the evangelicals, frankly, are just not there, usually, in most of the circles. It’s not exclusive. I’m not going to say all, but by far, it’s a very very small percentage and it’s really interesting because there’s just something so off on that system’s ability to play with others and it’s just a closed system and it’s because what comes back to the beginning really there’s just a certainty that they’re right and everyone else is wrong.

And that is so sad. So I’m so happy that you have found a place there and I have seen this a lot, is this place where gifts are valued freely. And I know watching so many female leaders lead and be ordained, become deacons and elders and pastor all different roles, just really find their way in the right churches. And they just are never in evangelical churches. They just never are, for the most part. They just aren’t.

Ruth Perry (42:51)
Yeah. When I was in that culture too, another piece was fear of people outside of my group. I just had so much fear and that fear kept me from really loving people. I’m just trying to think too about the piece of grief that you talk about in faith shifting and then the freedom on the other side, it’s so worth it.

Kathy Escobar (43:11)
Yeah, yeah, and you know the thing about grief, it’s so important is that it really does, I’m still sad. I’m 20 years, and honestly the 20 year mark has kind of had me reflecting on a lot of things because it’s a big ritual, you know, it’s a celebration and I look back 20 years is a long time and I just remembered those early years and The Refuge is totally different than it is what started. It started as a like eclectic, kind of emerging faith community that was built on the 12 steps of recovery and the Beatitudes. But it also was more Jesusy and more evangelical-y then than it is now. I look back to old writing and things that I wrote, it was just a different place.

But I think that the grief for me, it doesn’t just go away just because we reimagine and that’s what probably is the best illustration to me of all of these is their cycles and so we touch on it. Like, I’m in a really good place, I don’t ever look back and long. I don’t paint pictures of Egypt. I don’t do any of that I did but I don’t anymore but it’s still sad for me and the saddest part out of everything for me is that in 20 years not that much has changed in the systems. And that is just, that’s a travesty. And because so many other things have evolved, cultures evolved.

We know so much more about brain science people. And we know so much more in 20 years. We have access to so much greater good. And it just has not translated to most evangelical fundamentalist church systems. So that is grief. I do feel it. And part of grief is anger. And you talked on the ex-Good Christian and the Good Christian side, I am mad. I’m not nearly as mad as I was in the early days. I was just like, look out, because I had never really in any of my systems or my family been able to express anger.

But I am really mad and sad that they influenced this many people and it’s this harmful. And that there’s a rise now, like I feel like we made a lot of progress, and now there’s a rise that’s, I don’t think it’s real, real, on the ground it doesn’t feel real, as real as what we see on social media, now in the national media, because of this administration, but, there’s not a groundswell on the ground for that. There are far more amazing Methodist churches and progressive things and activists and, you know, all the people on the ground, like really trying to build a better community. But it does feel really sad that these things are being propped up in such a clear way and that they’re being attached to our our system that said it was supposed to be church and state, honestly. And so I have a lot of grief about that and a lot of anger.

And I think we all do, not everyone, those that are struggling with it, it’s really tapping into that. So even though I’m not as tuned in to the feelings that I had all those years ago, I still have feelings. And I think that that’s of grief because grief has no rules, it’s waves, it’s not stages, it just comes in little waves. The waves right now are not these big waves that overwhelm me, but they do bubble up and it’s sad. It’s sad.

Ruth Perry (46:46)
Yeah. Yeah, it’s hard not to be overwhelmed right now.

Kathy Escobar (46:49)
Yeah, it is. And that’s why resourcing is so important. You know, we were talking about, embodiment and resourcing. We need tools to help us be healthy.

And those look different every person, but whatever are the tools that help us be really centered and grounded and clear. And that’s why healing in this process, that’s why I love the work that you’ve been doing for all these years, because I’ve been following you all these years. I’m not on social media a bunch, but I get things on my feed and there’s good stuff. And it’s resourcing, that’s what it is. And so it’s trying to support people, to be really supported. And I think, you know, so many things now are really related to regulating our nervous systems. And none of that was in church. Nothing was about that. It was kind of detaching and having some spiritual experience but we didn’t have like those ways to do things in the moment and really do it in our whole bodies.

And the other part about resourcing our kindreds. You know, that’s what this project is all about. That’s what you guys are all about. Is that we are with other people that go, my gosh, yes, this is me. And it’s really hard, but I’m not alone. I’m with other people and that’s where I think the juice of faith shift, finding your way into re-imagining and through the unraveling process of having kindreds is so important. And I think right now in 2026 and what we’re up against, which is hard, we have got to be with people who help us. Resourcing is we change states because of it.

And so we might move from dysregulated to, that’s resourcing. So people help us do that. The tools do too. And so we have to get out of our lives, things that just make it worse and get in our lives. Things, people that help us really change states to last. And I think more and more people are finding it, but I do think it’s really hard in the technology world right now.

I saw something from Scott Painter’s work. Do you know anything about it? Yeah, Scott the Painter. And there was just a thing on doom scrolling. And it was like in a shark and it’s like doom scrolling. Don’t do it. And so it was really good because there were all these things you could do.

Ruth Perry (49:01)
Yeah, Scott the painter.

Kathy Escobar (49:14)
and they are all amazing things. Just get outside, call a friend, read a book, eat an apple. I remember thinking those are none of the things that would be suggested in the old system that we were in. And they’re all so simple. That’s the other part of resourcing and of being more embodied and greater freedom, mystery, and diversity is it’s simpler, less complex. We don’t have to have this long list of things to be okay. That’s the breaking the codependency. It’s like we’re secure and free and it’s pretty simple and it’s enough.

And that is part of unraveling, honestly, is just getting rid of all the things that you don’t need so we can travel lighter. And I think more people are going, I cannot travel heavy in this season. My backpack needs to have the least amount of stuff in it, because it’s hard enough to walk to work right now.

Ruth Perry (50:10)
Yeah. That’s a good word. You give me a lot to chew on and you’ve encouraged my faith and my journey and I hope you ⁓ encourage a lot of others and I hope people do read your book, Faith Shift. Where else can they follow you on social media, Kathy? What are you doing?

Kathy Escobar (50:13)
Thank you so much. Well, the best thing definitely because I have a few projects after that one that people might like Practicing and I have A Weary World for Christmas holiday hard and Turning Over Tables is my newest one related to disrupting power and so that might really resonate with some people right now. The best thing to do is go to my website which is Kathy Escobar.com and then it has the links. I’m on Instagram and I’m on Facebook. I’m not the best over there.

Probably my best way to connect right now is through the website, but I do have a Substack. I started writing again last year more regularly and I’m working on a new project called New Ways for a New World, Life and Faith Beyond Binary’s Boxes and Borders. And so I’ve been writing in that stream right now and I’m really happy about it. feels good for me too because I think that’s the new conversation is how do we do this? New ways. We need new ways for a new world because the world has changed so much just since four years. Then you take eight, then you take ten. You know, it’s just changed so much. So yeah, just go over there and you’ll find all the links.

Ruth Perry (51:29)
Yeah. Kathy Escobar.com and thank you so much, Kathy. God bless you.

Kathy Escobar (51:37)
It was so fun hanging out with you


Want to never miss a post here? You can subscribe by email! If you’re on your computer, there is a widget on the righthand side of my page, under my picture and intro. If you are on your phone, scroll to the bottom of the page to find the widget.

You can also Subscribe to The Beautiful Kingdom Builders Podcast on YouTubeSpotifyApple PodcastsAmazon Music, or more! If you find our conversation helpful, please share it with a friend, rate and review, and subscribe so you never miss an episode! God bless!